IIS

[Hello]

My operating system is Windows is windows XP Home.
IIs(Internet Information System) not installed because this window does not support the IIS.
Can I install IIS to work with web applications?
Where I go ?
Thank you
==========================

[Patrice]

AFAIK you could but this is basically unsupported :
http://www.15seconds.com/issue/020118.htm

What kind of work ? VS 2005 and later comes with a built in test server that should be enough to develop...

--
Patrice
"Hello" <fa***@alphalink.com.aua écrit dans le message de news: 46********@news.chariot.net.au...
My operating system is Windows is windows XP Home.
IIs(Internet Information System) not installed because this window does not support the IIS.
Can I install IIS to work with web applications?
Where I go ?
Thank you
==========================

[Hello]

Each time I create Web site, and test it the program ask me to go to internet.
I work with Visual studio 2005
"Patrice" <http://www.chez.com/scribe/wrote in message news:us**************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
AFAIK you could but this is basically unsupported :
http://www.15seconds.com/issue/020118.htm

What kind of work ? VS 2005 and later comes with a built in test server that should be enough to develop...

--
Patrice
"Hello" <fa***@alphalink.com.aua écrit dans le message de news: 46********@news.chariot.net.au...
My operating system is Windows is windows XP Home.
IIs(Internet Information System) not installed because this window does not support the IIS.
Can I install IIS to work with web applications?
Where I go ?
Thank you
==========================

[rowe_newsgroups]

Each time I create Web site, and test it the program ask me to go to internet.

What do you mean it asks you to go to the internet? As soon as you
press F5 of Ctrl+F5 to run the site it should start the ASP.Net test
server and open up the site in your default browser. Is yours doing
something different?

Thanks,

Seth Rowe

[Mr. Arnold]

"Hello" <fa***@alphalink.com.auwrote in message
news:46********@news.chariot.net.au...
My operating system is Windows is windows XP Home.
IIs(Internet Information System) not installed because this window does not
support the IIS.
Can I install IIS to work with web applications?
Where I go ?
Thank you
==========================

I think that most would tell you to go purchase XP Pro that comes with IIS.

[Patrice]

IMO this is because "work offline" is checked in your IE menu, so IE is not supposed to connect to a site but to only retrieve pages from its cache.

Just uncheck this or tell IE he can go "on the internet". Actually it won't go to the internet (you may have to check your connection tab or swithc off your modem if you are really afraid to pay for your connection). It will then go to http://localhost/ which is the test web site on your local computer.

As a side note, it's generally best to ask about the original problem rather than on a solution you came up with so that one could suggest another better solution to the real problem you have rather than to help with a less easy workaround..

--
Patrice

"Hello" <fa***@alphalink.com.aua écrit dans le message de news: 46********@news.chariot.net.au...
Each time I create Web site, and test it the program ask me to go to internet.
I work with Visual studio 2005
"Patrice" <http://www.chez.com/scribe/wrote in message news:us**************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
AFAIK you could but this is basically unsupported :
http://www.15seconds.com/issue/020118.htm

What kind of work ? VS 2005 and later comes with a built in test server that should be enough to develop...

--
Patrice
"Hello" <fa***@alphalink.com.aua écrit dans le message de news: 46********@news.chariot.net.au...
My operating system is Windows is windows XP Home.
IIs(Internet Information System) not installed because this window does not support the IIS.
Can I install IIS to work with web applications?
Where I go ?
Thank you
==========================

[Michel Posseth [MCP]]

AFAIK , you cannot install IIS without performing ilegal hacks on the operating system

However Cassini will run on Windows XP home as the Internall VS2005 preview and the previous VS2003 webdeveloper tools are cassini based you should not have a problem .
I strongly recomend you to use at least Windows XP pro for development purposes
regads

Michel

"Hello" <fa***@alphalink.com.auschreef in bericht news:46********@news.chariot.net.au...
My operating system is Windows is windows XP Home.
IIs(Internet Information System) not installed because this window does not support the IIS.
Can I install IIS to work with web applications?
Where I go ?
Thank you
==========================

[Hello]

The Program ask me by bringing connection to internet
=======================================
"rowe_newsgroups" <ro********@yahoo.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@r34g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com...
|Each time I create Web site, and test it the program ask me to go to
internet.
|
| What do you mean it asks you to go to the internet? As soon as you
| press F5 of Ctrl+F5 to run the site it should start the ASP.Net test
| server and open up the site in your default browser. Is yours doing
| something different?
|
| Thanks,
|
| Seth Rowe
|

[Mr. Arnold]

"rowe_newsgroups" <ro********@yahoo.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@k79g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...

<snipped>

>
Please read my posts a little better next time before attacking my
suggestions.

I didn't ask for the suggestion, and you should post to the OP about your
suggestion and not to me about it, because the reality about the whole
situation is I don't care.

[rowe_newsgroups]

On Sep 2, 2:19 pm, "Mr. Arnold" <MR. [e-mail]:

"rowe_newsgroups" <[e-mail] in message

news:11*********************@k79g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...

<snipped>

Please read my posts a little better next time before attacking my
suggestions.

I didn't ask for the suggestion, and you should post to the OP about your
suggestion and not to me about it, because the reality about the whole
situation is I don't care.

You posted saying "I think that most would tell you to go purchase XP
Pro that comes with IIS. " and I responded saying "I wouldn't" and
gave my reasons. This was the reason I responded to your post and not
the OP.

All I'm asking is that you actually take the time to read my posts and
quit inferring things incorrectly.

Thanks,

Seth Rowe

[Mr. Arnold]

"rowe_newsgroups" <ro********@yahoo.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@r29g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...

On Sep 2, 2:19 pm, "Mr. Arnold" <MR. [e-mail]:

>"rowe_newsgroups" <[e-mail] in message

news:11*********************@k79g2000hse.googlegr oups.com...

<snipped>

Please read my posts a little better next time before attacking my
suggestions.

I didn't ask for the suggestion, and you should post to the OP about your
suggestion and not to me about it, because the reality about the whole
situation is I don't care.

You posted saying "I think that most would tell you to go purchase XP
Pro that comes with IIS. " and I responded saying "I wouldn't" and
gave my reasons. This was the reason I responded to your post and not
the OP.

Who cares?

>
All I'm asking is that you actually take the time to read my posts and
quit inferring things incorrectly.

What do you want me to do? Should I hand you a tissue, since you seem to be
in whine mode?

I mind my own business and post to the OP that's it. And I am going to be
blunt about it. You don't mean anything to me, and this is much to do about
*nothing*.

[Andrew Morton]

Michel Posseth [MCP] wrote:

I strongly recomend you to use at least Windows XP pro for
development purposes

On that note, doesn't VS2005 come with a development-and-test licence
version of Windows Server 2003?

My VS2003 Professional did, but that may have been because it was the last
edition before VS2005 was released.

Andrew

[rowe_newsgroups]

All I'm asking is that you actually take the time to read my posts and

quit inferring things incorrectly.

What do you want me to do?

I think my statement you quoted explains what I want - I do not like
being libeled and simply asked you to be more careful next time. If I
accussed you incorrectly of advocating illegal hacks and you corrected
me, I would offer my apologizies to you. One would think you would do
the same...

Thanks,

Seth Rowe

[Mr. Arnold]

"rowe_newsgroups" <ro********@yahoo.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@19g2000hsx.googlegro ups.com...

All I'm asking is that you actually take the time to read my posts and
quit inferring things incorrectly.

What do you want me to do?

I think my statement you quoted explains what I want - I do not like
being libeled and simply asked you to be more careful next time. If I
accussed you incorrectly of advocating illegal hacks and you corrected
me, I would offer my apologizies to you. One would think you would do
the same...

Yes sir master rowe_newsgroups -- yes sir, and I'll get it done for you
straight way, count on it master rowe_newsgroups -- yes sir. :)

Now, is it possible for you to stop harassing me?

[rowe_newsgroups]

Yes sir master rowe_newsgroups -- yes sir, and I'll get it done for you

straight way, count on it master rowe_newsgroups -- yes sir. :)

:-)

About time someone spoke to me properly!

Now, is it possible for you to stop harassing me?

You just had to add that didn't you? For the record, I tried to handle
this in a profession way, just wanting an apology for your allegations
- so I don't see how I was "harassing" you.

Thanks,

Seth Rowe

[Mr. Arnold]

"rowe_newsgroups" <ro********@yahoo.comwrote in message <>

<snipped>

I'll book you on Jerry Springer, because that's where you belong. You can
display your mental issues to the world, because don't kid yourself, you do
have some mental issues you need taken care of so that you can function.
Personally, I think you need to be locked-up. If you think I am going to
kiss your behind, you got another thing coming.

[rowe_newsgroups]

Someone what to tell me how that one statement above that I made about using

IIS on XP Pro is doing the right thing (IMO) has somehow lead to me
misquoting this person?

Perhaps I misunderstood you earlier - so here is your chance to
clarify:

Did you not mean that by me stating that is was needless and foolish
to upgrade to XP Pro to test web applications it was morally/legally
wrong? And also didn't this imply that I was one of the advocates of
hacking XP Home to run IIS? This is what I took from your statements,
and this is why I asked for an apology.

I don't know what's wrong with this person, and personally (IMHO) this
person needs to be locked up.

FYI - posted "(IMHO)" before a libelous statement does not make it any
more libelous. Would you now like to drop the childlike antics and
talk about this like an adult?

I am doing what I can to handle this in a professional manner - please
drop the name calling and simply answer my above question about what
you meant by your previous statements. If I misunderstood your intents
I will apologize, and if you misunderstood my intents the professional
thing for you to do would be to apologize.

Thanks,

Seth Rowe

[Mr. Arnold]

"rowe_newsgroups" <ro********@yahoo.comwrote in message

<snipped>

>
I am doing what I can to handle this in a professional manner - please
drop the name calling and simply answer my above question about what
you meant by your previous statements. If I misunderstood your intents
I will apologize, and if you misunderstood my intents the professional
thing for you to do would be to apologize.

You had no business coming into my face to begin with, period. You needed to
post to the OP, and mind your own business like I was mining my own
business. But you couldn't do that could you? You had to lip service me on
something that I absolutely could care less about it.

I don't have to explain *anything* to you, master. I am not here to hold
your hand , satisfy you or cater to your needs. That's the job of your
family, and I doubt that they even do that.

I thought I made it kind of clear in my posts that I didn't want to be
bothered with you, but you choose to ignore it.

The only thing you can do at this point and in the future is just stay out
of my face, because I'll put it to you bluntly again, *you* *don't* *mean*
*anything* *to* *me*. I could care less about what you're talking about.

I am here for the OP that needs help, if I can help the OP. I am not here
for you.

I can't make it any plainer to you than that.

[rowe_newsgroups]

On Sep 4, 7:32 am, "Mr. Arnold" <MR. [e-mail]:

"rowe_newsgroups" <[e-mail] in message

<snipped>

I am doing what I can to handle this in a professional manner - please
drop the name calling and simply answer my above question about what
you meant by your previous statements. If I misunderstood your intents
I will apologize, and if you misunderstood my intents the professional
thing for you to do would be to apologize.

You had no business coming into my face to begin with, period. You needed to
post to the OP, and mind your own business like I was mining my own
business. But you couldn't do that could you? You had to lip service me on
something that I absolutely could care less about it.

I don't have to explain *anything* to you, master. I am not here to hold
your hand , satisfy you or cater to your needs. That's the job of your
family, and I doubt that they even do that.

I thought I made it kind of clear in my posts that I didn't want to be
bothered with you, but you choose to ignore it.

The only thing you can do at this point and in the future is just stay out
of my face, because I'll put it to you bluntly again, *you* *don't* *mean*
*anything* *to* *me*. I could care less about what you're talking about.

I am here for the OP that needs help, if I can help the OP. I am not here
for you.

I can't make it any plainer to you than that.

Sigh, I can see you are not a professional and continuing this
conversation will be as futile as continuing one with Aaron Kempf. I
hope the readers of this post at least see my attempts to resolve a
situation and your complete disregard for all professional conduct.

Now to let this thread die...

Thanks,

Seth Rowe

[Mr. Arnold]

"rowe_newsgroups" <ro********@yahoo.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@o80g2000hse.googlegr oups.com...

On Sep 4, 7:32 am, "Mr. Arnold" <MR. [e-mail]:

>"rowe_newsgroups" <[e-mail] in message

<snipped>

I am doing what I can to handle this in a professional manner - please
drop the name calling and simply answer my above question about what
you meant by your previous statements. If I misunderstood your intents
I will apologize, and if you misunderstood my intents the professional
thing for you to do would be to apologize.

You had no business coming into my face to begin with, period. You needed
to
post to the OP, and mind your own business like I was mining my own
business. But you couldn't do that could you? You had to lip service me
on
something that I absolutely could care less about it.

I don't have to explain *anything* to you, master. I am not here to hold
your hand , satisfy you or cater to your needs. That's the job of your
family, and I doubt that they even do that.

I thought I made it kind of clear in my posts that I didn't want to be
bothered with you, but you choose to ignore it.

The only thing you can do at this point and in the future is just stay
out
of my face, because I'll put it to you bluntly again, *you* *don't*
*mean*
*anything* *to* *me*. I could care less about what you're talking about.

I am here for the OP that needs help, if I can help the OP. I am not here
for you.

I can't make it any plainer to you than that.

Sigh, I can see you are not a professional and continuing this
conversation will be as futile as continuing one with Aaron Kempf. I
hope the readers of this post at least see my attempts to resolve a
situation and your complete disregard for all professional conduct.

Now to let this thread die...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional

You and this NG are not putting one penny in my pockets. If there was some
money on the line and I was getting *paid*, then things I would be
different.

You act like I know who Aaron Kempf is. I don't know who he is, and I don't
want to know who you are either. And I haven't read your posts in the past
nor will I be reading them in future.

I am not here to debate or discuss anything with the *regulars*. I am here
only for the OP that needs help, otherwise, someone like you shows with the
need to start running your mouth.

Hasta la vista -- baby!

[Mr. Arnold]

"jeff" <jhersey at allnorth dottt comwrote in message

<snipped>

I don't think I did attack the poster. I just didn't want hear what he had
to say. which he didn't seem to understand nor do you it seems.

You have your opinions on things, and I have my opinions on things. Opinions
are a dime a dozen, and everyone has got one. There is no debate about this,
and I don't want to hear what you have to say about it. He, you and the OP
can do whatever you want with your machines, because after all, they are
your machines. I could care less about it.

I'll tell anyone who is doing Web development with no exceptions. One uses a
workstation O/S that supports a Web Server such as Win 2k Pro, XP Pro and
Vista, and I don't care what VS 2005 has in it.

There is no maybe(s), black or white and in betweens with me concerning
this - none. That's my opinion and my take on things that I have applied to
IT since 1971. There would be no way some thing like XP Home Edition would
even be considered, and XP Pro should have been the O/S the OP should have
gotten right out of the gate.

[Rory Becker]

"jeff" <jhersey at allnorth dottt comwrote in message

>
<snipped>

I don't think I did attack the poster. I just didn't want hear what he
had to say. Which he didn't seem to understand nor do you it seems.

"Mr Arnold" you say you don't think you attacked Seth. This is of course
good because, even if your posts came across badly, it means that you did
not intend them to. We are all guilty from time to time of rash decisions
and of jumping to conclusions.

However we now have a total of 3 people (Seth, jeff and myself) who think
Seth's position is a valid one. Save for myself (I'm sure there is time yet),
I would say you have been, at the very least, unpleasent to all of them.
These people are simply giving their opinion.

Seth's point was a direct counterpoint to your own and in the natural flow
of a conversation it made most sense that he reply to you rather than directly
to the OP. This is usually to help the flow of understanding from one post
to the next.

I'll tell anyone who is doing Web development with no exceptions. One
uses a workstation O/S that supports a Web Server such as Win 2k Pro,
XP Pro and Vista, and I don't care what VS 2005 has in it.
There is no maybe(s), black or white and in betweens with me
concerning this - none.

About whether this is your opinion or not, I agree - There can of course
be no debate.

About whether this is reasonable or not. Well... you have as I say, had 3
people suggest the opposite.

I hate to break it to you, but in the real world...

.... there are shades of grey
.... there are business concerns
.... there is opinion
.... there are exceptions

all with good reason.

Are you really saying that when confronted with an apparent choice between
option a and option b, you never look for an option c because "There is no
maybe(s), black or white and in betweens with me"

"I'll *tell* anyone", "One uses", "I don't care" - *If* this is truely the
case (but I suspect not) then don't be surprised if *most* ignore you.

The balance of probability suggests that the OP would care about "what VS
2005 has in it".

That's my opinion and my take on things that I
have applied to IT since 1971.

Again opinion should be flexible to new idea's. If your opinion had not changed
at all in all those years then it would be a miracle if you were still employed/in
business. Again I suspect that you are in fact more flexible than you let on.

There would be no way some thing like
XP Home Edition would even be considered, and XP Pro should have been
the O/S the OP should have gotten right out of the gate.

As indicated, the world is not Black and White.

Depends if the user had any say in the matter or even knew about the limitation
in the first place.
he might have been hopeing to turn a hobby into something more. Typically
people not based in the industry have very little need of XPPro and would
have to use the family PC (Very likely to have XPHome on it) for any experimental
programming that they might be doing.

--
Rory

[Mr. Arnold]

"Rory Becker" <Ro********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
<snipped>

I am not here to debate with anyone, nor do I want to hear about anyone's
opinions on something. My only concern is to the OP. I would prefer that
you and others just ignore me and not post to me, because. Life will go on,
the Sun will come up and it will be a new day.

None of this of which you talk about means anything to me. It's moot. I
don't care. I don't dance to anyone's tune out here on the Internet.

[Mr. Arnold]

One other thing, when you and others come to the realization that I don't
want to be bothered with anything one may want to say to me trying to give
his or her take on things, and that I am NOT going to receptive of it, then
the better things are going to be a a whole.

[Rory Becker]

One other thing, when you and others come to the realization that I

don't want to be bothered with anything one may want to say to me
trying to give his or her take on things, and that I am NOT going to
receptive of it, then the better things are going to be a a whole.

Good luck with that.

I submit that the only way not to have people talk to you is to not be where
people are.

If you don't like the way the world works, don't go out into it.

--
Rory

[Mr. Arnold]

"Rory Becker" <Ro********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:b0**************************@msnews.microsoft .com...

>One other thing, when you and others come to the realization that I
don't want to be bothered with anything one may want to say to me
trying to give his or her take on things, and that I am NOT going to
receptive of it, then the better things are going to be a a whole.

Good luck with that.

I submit that the only way not to have people talk to you is to not be
where people are.

If you don't like the way the world works, don't go out into it.

The other thing is just to killfile you, so that I won't see you again. And
that's what is going to happen now -- good bye. :)