Phil,
VS 2003, .NET 1.1, and SQL Server 200, and I believe SQL Server 7.0 also
have access to SQL Notification Services ;-)
SQL Server 2005 just adds some new & expanded features to the mix!
--
Hope this helps
Jay [MVP - Outlook]
..NET Application Architect, Enthusiast, & Evangelist
T.S. Bradley -
http://www.tsbradley.net
"Phil G." <Ph**@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:dn**********@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
| Hi Jay,
|
| ....NO! :-)...
|
| Actually, I have limited experience with SQL in as much as I can create
SQL
| db's, write/read etc however I am but a poor vb.net hobbyist :-) I don't
| have 2005 and only use 2003 with the 1.1 Framework.....perhaps a little
over
| my head at this point!
|
| Thanks for your comments.
|
| Regards, Phil
|
| "Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" <Ja************@tsbradley.net> wrote in
| message news:e0**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
| > Phil,
| > In addition to the other comments.
| >
| > Have you considered using SQL Notification Services to have your app
| > notified when changes are made to the database?
| >
| >
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/technol...n/default.mspx
| >
| >
| > When you app starts it could determine when the next event occurs & wait
| > for
| > the event. If a table change occurs before the event, the service could
| > wake
| > up (due to the notification services) and recalculate when the next
event
| > occurs.
| >
| > I know .NET 2.0 has some support for SQL Notification Services, however
| > I'm
| > not sure how much is exposed for your Windows Service to leverage
them...
| > --
| > Hope this helps
| > Jay [MVP - Outlook]
| > .NET Application Architect, Enthusiast, & Evangelist
| > T.S. Bradley -
http://www.tsbradley.net
| >
| >
| > "Phil G." <Ph**@nospam.com> wrote in message
| > news:dn**********@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
| > | Hi all,
| > |
| > | I would like to create a very simple 'lite' version of Outlook
| > Calendar's
| > | reminder function. I will use a windows service that will read
timedate
| > | stamps from a db and compare them to Now. This seems that it will
create
| > a
| > | lot of processor overhead in terms of 'how often shall I check the
db?'.
| > I
| > | wonder if I check it hourly and save additional info. as a
timespan...I
| > just
| > | don't know......has anyone got any ideas of best practice for this
sort
| > of
| > | thing?
| > |
| > | Thanks in advance.
| > |
| > | Phil
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|