Hi,
Hi, I was looking for your opinion on VB.NET - its long-term
prospects, etc. Sorry this is vague, but it's not meant to be a troll.
It's a pro-VB.NET post actually.
I haven't used VB or VB.NET really, but I have used Realbasic (a vb
clone), Java, C#, C, and Python.
I work in education, and I'd like something that is easy enough for
teachers and students to use to develop real, usable applications, not
just to learn programming for programming's sake. We used to use
Hypercard/Supercard for this kind of stuff, and Realbasic was ok, too,
but they are commercial, not cheap, and also lock you in to their
environment. Nowadays most in education use Java and flash.
I didn't really consider VB.NET before because it is also proprietary
and I didn't want to force teachers or students to have to buy Visual
Studio even if there is academic pricing. But now we have the free
SharpDevelop IDE as well as Mono's mbas and MonoDevelop IDE for other
platforms.
MY QUESTIONS:
But I'm wondering why there seems to be a lot of negative opinions about
VB.NET when it is very well designed and much easier to learn and use
than even python for example.
And secondly, is there a real waning interest in VB.NET, or is VB.NET's
long-term future in any jeopardy? Will VB.NET ever become an open
standard like C#? Is Microsoft going to do anything with .NET to
compete more with java and flash's features like easier animations,
better scientific/numeric libraries, and running in any browser (not
just IE)? Avalon seems too limiting.
Thanks for any feedback.
I have a lot of appreciation for the design of VB.NET now.
When I've looked at ways to make other open source languages like python
or boo easier for beginners, the ideas turn out to be the same as what
VB.NET uses. Things like using "as" for types: "i as String" (seen in
boo), case-insensitivity, real division (7/4=1.75 instead of 1 like in
python and C#), WYSIWYG form designer, etc.
So I'm listing some other nice features in the design of VB.NET and then
some drawbacks, but I don't see why VB.NET deserves so much heat.
NICE FEATURES OF VB.NET:
-you can use GUI designers and code completion when coding VB in an IDE,
including the free SharpDevelop IDE (you have nothing as good as this
for python or javascript for example)
-uses just = for both assignment and equivalence tests, instead of = and
==, which can cause errors in other languages.
-use of understandable English keywords like "MustInherit" instead of
obtuse keywords like abstract or virtual. Although I'm sure this is a
significant drawback when you already have learned java or C#, and the
upper-casing of all keywords hurts readability a little I think.
-case-insensitive syntax (unlike C# or python), which definitely helps
beginners
-no semi-colons at the end of the line, no curly braces for blocks
-don't have to worry about perfectly indenting everything like in python
-flexible options that let you for example not have to declare every
variable first if you don't want to
-the My.Computer stuff added for .NET 2.0
-default values for parameters
DRAWBACKS:
-missing some advanced features that C# has, but many were added for
VB.NET in .NET 2.0. It even supports generics.
-sometimes difficult for classic VB programmers to switch to VB.NET
since it is quite different with its new OOP java-like features.
-my main reason for not considering VB.NET before was because it wasn't
open or free. But now we can use SharpDevelop or Mono's mbas and
MonoDevelop, although I believe its vb implementation is behind on .NET
2.0 features.
-The array index thing is a bit strange, like this creates a 5 item
array, not 4: Dim names(4) As String
-the popularity of VB and VB.NET seems to be waning. Book sales have
dropped a good bit over the past couple of years. People are switching
to C# instead of VB.NET I guess. It seems like most every .NET code
sample out there is in C# too instead of VB.NET.
-both VB.NET and C# have no type inference. If the compiler were open
and flexible we could add this ourselves (see the boo language for .NET
for example) as well as other useful new features that may take
Microsoft years to add if they add them at all.
-event handling is clunky, "AddHandler MsgArrivedEvent, AddressOf
My_MsgArrivedCallback"
GENERAL DRAWBACKS OF .NET FOR EDUCATION
-can't run apps in any browser like java, only IE on Windows
-not as geared to animations and simulations like java and flash are
-Mono hasn't caught on as much yet as hopefully it will 2 1658
Hi DH,
I won't begin to answer all of your questions, but vb .net is here to stay;
it's robust, cutting edge, capable of anything, provides data access and oop
features as effective as found in any language, and MS will be supporting it
for a long, long time. It's not only in itself feature rich, but the 3rd
party support is remarkable. It is the future, no less than any of the
visual studio languages, namely c#.
HTH,
Bernie Yaeger
"D H" <no@spam> wrote in message news:u5********************@comcast.com... Hi, Hi, I was looking for your opinion on VB.NET - its long-term prospects, etc. Sorry this is vague, but it's not meant to be a troll. It's a pro-VB.NET post actually.
I haven't used VB or VB.NET really, but I have used Realbasic (a vb clone), Java, C#, C, and Python. I work in education, and I'd like something that is easy enough for teachers and students to use to develop real, usable applications, not just to learn programming for programming's sake. We used to use Hypercard/Supercard for this kind of stuff, and Realbasic was ok, too, but they are commercial, not cheap, and also lock you in to their environment. Nowadays most in education use Java and flash.
I didn't really consider VB.NET before because it is also proprietary and I didn't want to force teachers or students to have to buy Visual Studio even if there is academic pricing. But now we have the free SharpDevelop IDE as well as Mono's mbas and MonoDevelop IDE for other platforms.
MY QUESTIONS: But I'm wondering why there seems to be a lot of negative opinions about VB.NET when it is very well designed and much easier to learn and use than even python for example. And secondly, is there a real waning interest in VB.NET, or is VB.NET's long-term future in any jeopardy? Will VB.NET ever become an open standard like C#? Is Microsoft going to do anything with .NET to compete more with java and flash's features like easier animations, better scientific/numeric libraries, and running in any browser (not just IE)? Avalon seems too limiting.
Thanks for any feedback.
I have a lot of appreciation for the design of VB.NET now. When I've looked at ways to make other open source languages like python or boo easier for beginners, the ideas turn out to be the same as what VB.NET uses. Things like using "as" for types: "i as String" (seen in boo), case-insensitivity, real division (7/4=1.75 instead of 1 like in python and C#), WYSIWYG form designer, etc.
So I'm listing some other nice features in the design of VB.NET and then some drawbacks, but I don't see why VB.NET deserves so much heat.
NICE FEATURES OF VB.NET: -you can use GUI designers and code completion when coding VB in an IDE, including the free SharpDevelop IDE (you have nothing as good as this for python or javascript for example) -uses just = for both assignment and equivalence tests, instead of = and ==, which can cause errors in other languages. -use of understandable English keywords like "MustInherit" instead of obtuse keywords like abstract or virtual. Although I'm sure this is a significant drawback when you already have learned java or C#, and the upper-casing of all keywords hurts readability a little I think. -case-insensitive syntax (unlike C# or python), which definitely helps beginners -no semi-colons at the end of the line, no curly braces for blocks -don't have to worry about perfectly indenting everything like in python -flexible options that let you for example not have to declare every variable first if you don't want to -the My.Computer stuff added for .NET 2.0 -default values for parameters
DRAWBACKS: -missing some advanced features that C# has, but many were added for VB.NET in .NET 2.0. It even supports generics. -sometimes difficult for classic VB programmers to switch to VB.NET since it is quite different with its new OOP java-like features. -my main reason for not considering VB.NET before was because it wasn't open or free. But now we can use SharpDevelop or Mono's mbas and MonoDevelop, although I believe its vb implementation is behind on .NET 2.0 features. -The array index thing is a bit strange, like this creates a 5 item array, not 4: Dim names(4) As String -the popularity of VB and VB.NET seems to be waning. Book sales have dropped a good bit over the past couple of years. People are switching to C# instead of VB.NET I guess. It seems like most every .NET code sample out there is in C# too instead of VB.NET. -both VB.NET and C# have no type inference. If the compiler were open and flexible we could add this ourselves (see the boo language for .NET for example) as well as other useful new features that may take Microsoft years to add if they add them at all. -event handling is clunky, "AddHandler MsgArrivedEvent, AddressOf My_MsgArrivedCallback"
GENERAL DRAWBACKS OF .NET FOR EDUCATION -can't run apps in any browser like java, only IE on Windows -not as geared to animations and simulations like java and flash are -Mono hasn't caught on as much yet as hopefully it will
DH,
The last week took something remarkable place in these newsgroups.
There is a crossposted message between VBNet and C# in this link. http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...40dd84ef286452
The remarkable part is that I saw for the first time that C# adapts were
strongly defendable discussing about benefits of VBNet. (Although they keep
it with C#)
This thread above should give you a lot of information. I point you on my
first answer, which is not mine, however again a link to a message from
somebody who gave in my opinion on of the best (complete) answers about this
questions I have seen in this.
However, VBNet is the same as mature natural languages is, a not consistent
language. You can do (say) a lot of things in different ways, and you cannot
tell that one is better than another. For starting teaching simple
programming, I would therefore use a C derived language. It does not
directly confuse a student. Showing him/here this mature situation is in my
opinion however something that should be done in the same time, to give not
a wrong idea.
By the way, VBNet has (as C#) a free compiler in every framework. For VBNet
it is VBC.exe. You have than to create programs with by instance a notebook.
Probably does the IDE's that you mention use that one.
(The big benefit for me from VBNet above C# is its extremely helpful IDE as
it is in Visual.Studio.Net)
I hope this helps something,
Cor This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Brian Patterson |
last post by:
I have noticed in the book of words that hasattr works by calling getattr
and raising an exception if no such attribute exists. If I need the value
in any case, am I better off using getattr...
|
by: Venn Syii |
last post by:
I've searched all the forums but cannot find an answer to this question.
I do the following:
vector<MyClass*> myClassList;
Later in the program I try to add to myClassList with a...
|
by: Philip Nelson |
last post by:
POSTED ON BEHALF OF DAVID OWEN (UK DB2 Users Group Chair)
DB2 UK Education Conference Â
Westmead Hotel, Birmingham
Tuesday 16th Wednesday 17th November 2004 Â
in association with GSE
 ...
|
by: Jatinder |
last post by:
I 'm a professional looking for the job.In interview these questions
were asked with some others which I answered.But some of them left
unanswered.Plz help.
Here are some questions on C/C++, OS...
|
by: earthlinkmail |
last post by:
....you experienced programmers of C; did you start with C? What course
of study did you pursue to get to where you are today? Would you
suggest starting with REALbasic first for a n00b? I am...
|
by: WStoreyII |
last post by:
First Question:
Due to the hours of my job i can not go to school right now and i can't
afford online classes. My questions is that i have learned a lot about .net
and i am pretty sure that if...
|
by: antonyliu2002 |
last post by:
Right now I put my VB code in the aspx pages. I would prefer to use
codebehind, especially many of my VB functions may be shared across
multiple aspx pages.
I've tried a few pages with...
|
by: efrat |
last post by:
Hello,
I'm planning to use Python in order to teach a DSA (data structures
and algorithms) course in an academic institute. If you could help out
with the following questions, I'd sure...
|
by: dreamznatcher |
last post by:
Hello,
I'm considering a career switch to a more database-related job, but
need help on a few questions and issues. I'm a Computer Engineering
graduate and have always felt most comfortable...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| | |