Cor,
FWIW: A couple more interesting "real life" links on the performance of
64bit Windows XP.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u...loringx64.mspx
Specifically:
http://www.cakewalk.com/x64/whitepaper.asp
Unfortunately my app uses Interop so testing it under 64bit is not an option
right now. However I am looking at moving the Interop piece to be a
replacable plug in, allowing the 64bit to use something other then Interop.
My app is primarily text (XML) processing so 32-bit vs 64-Bit Integer size
is imaterial. I would expect a slight increase in performance under 64bit
due to the greater number of registers (the JIT is able to enregister more
variables) and the increased amount of memory (less disk swapping). However
my app may be IO bound...
Jay
"Cor Ligthert" <no************@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
|R Paulson,
|
| I would not take to much expectations from the idea of performance
benefits
| by upgrading to a 64Bits environment. (In VBNet the Integer stays even
| 32Bits and would therefore need probably slightly more processing than
now,
| although the new 64Bits processors have a higher cycle times so that will
| probably not be recognized)
|
| As mostly with Microsoft software will the current software run on the
next
| OS version.
|
| However going from Access to SQL server will probably give you benefit as
| well as better maintenance in future with creating programs OOP and more
| posibilities to get the bottle necks from your programs and optimize it
for
| your need.
|
| However as I have seen in this newsgroups is there not an easier tool for
| it, than hiring some developpers. Set your current programs in whatever
| structured description format and start programming again.
|
| You can as well think about using Access on your SQL server by the way.
|
| However as mostly with Access have you as well a maintenance problem and
are
| you now not able to optimize it.
|
| I hope this gives some idea's,
|
| Cor
|
|