Any difference about "me" or without "me"

[Agnes]

For my own practices.
I like to put "Me".
e.g IF Me.txtInvoice.textlength = 0 ....... etc
Me.txt.....etc

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??
Thanks

[Mike Smith]

....coding me or the lack of it is the same..the only "difference" is the
length of the line of code

however with the "ME" its easy to access the controls on the form , if ur
unsure or just lazy to type the name of the textbox u can always
autocomplete it with the intellisense...
--
Regards,
Mike
http://bikesh.europe.webmatrixhosting.net
http://www.planetsourcecode.com (search keyword: phoetus)

"Agnes" <ag***@dynamictech.com.hk> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

For my own practices.
I like to put "Me".
e.g IF Me.txtInvoice.textlength = 0 ....... etc
Me.txt.....etc

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??
Thanks

....coding me or the lack of it is the same..the only "difference" is the
length of the line of code

however with the "ME" its easy to access the controls on the form , if ur
unsure or just lazy to type the name of the textbox u can always
autocomplete it with the intellisense...
--
Regards,
Mike
http://bikesh.europe.webmatrixhosting.net
http://www.planetsourcecode.com (search keyword: phoetus)

"Agnes" <ag***@dynamictech.com.hk> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... For my own practices.
I like to put "Me".
e.g IF Me.txtInvoice.textlength = 0 ....... etc
Me.txt.....etc

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??
Thanks

[Mattias Sjögren]

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??

No, not as long as you don't have any conflicting variables. If you
have both a local and a class level variable with the same name, you
can disambiguate it with Me.

Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[Agnes]

;O ic thanks .
for my vfp experience.
If I use " thisform.txt.....etc" , the program will run slowly . so I wonder
whehter got the same effect.
"Mattias Sjögren" <ma********************@mvps.org> ???
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl ???...

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??

No, not as long as you don't have any conflicting variables. If you
have both a local and a class level variable with the same name, you
can disambiguate it with Me.

Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[Cor Ligthert]

Hi Agnes,

An often made misunderstanding, in an interpretted language the lenght of a
dataname can make sense because it has always to be loaded and evaluated.

For a program language which makes executables (in whatever form and without
debugging information) the lenght or form of your variable names should not
matter at all. In that a dataname is nothing more than a mnemonic for the
programmer.

I hope this helps?

Cor

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

* "Mike Smith" <te**@test.com> scripsit:

however with the "ME" its easy to access the controls on the form , if ur
unsure or just lazy to type the name of the textbox u can always
autocomplete it with the intellisense...

That's why I always use 'Me', except for private variables ('m_*').

--
Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
<URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
<URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>