473,396 Members | 1,780 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,396 software developers and data experts.

Use Interfaces to Hook up Event Handlers

I have a class, which implements an interface. Let's say, that the interface
looks something like

Public Interface IEventSinks
Sub ValueChanged(sender As Object, e As ValueChangedEventArgs)
Sub StateUpdated(sender As Object, e As StateUpdatedEventArgs)
End Interface

In practice, the interface contains many more event handlers like this, but
you get the picture.

I have another interface like this

Public Interface IEventSinks2
Sub SomethingElseHappened(sender As Object, e As
SomethingElseHappenedEventArgs)
...
End Interface

Then, I have my classes:

Public Class ClassA
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks

...
End Class

Public Class ClassB
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks2

...
End Class

Now, in my main code, I have

Dim obj1 As ClassBase = New ClassA
Dim obj2 As ClassBase = New ClassB

If TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks Then
AddHandler ValueChangedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.ValueChanged
AddHandler StateUpdatedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.StateUpdated

ElseIf TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks2 Then
AddHandler SomethingElseHappenedEventSource, AddressOf
obj1.SomethingElseHappened
Endif
As you can see, even for a couple of event handlers it starts to get a bit
messy, and hard to maintain. In reality, I have seven different object types
and eight different interfaces that may or may not be implemented. Depending
on the interfaces implemented, I need to notify my classes of different
events.

Is there a more convenient way to hook up handlers based on interfaces
implemented? For example, if my event source class and event handler class
both implement a particular interface, it would be great if I could just
write one line that says "ClassX handles all events raised by ClassY based
on a common interface".

As Cor has already observed, I try to simplify my examples initially and
build them up later, so if what I am trying to do looks odd it could be
because I am paraphrasing.

TIA

Charles
Nov 20 '05 #1
6 1771
Charles,
Have you considered simply using the Interfaces as the event handlers?

Which effectively is Java's "Event Listener" pattern?

Instead of using AddHandler to add each method of the interface to the
Event, save the Interface variable itself in a collection, when you go to
raise the Event, iterate this collection and call the respective method.

Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ey**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
I have a class, which implements an interface. Let's say, that the interface looks something like

Public Interface IEventSinks
Sub ValueChanged(sender As Object, e As ValueChangedEventArgs)
Sub StateUpdated(sender As Object, e As StateUpdatedEventArgs)
End Interface

In practice, the interface contains many more event handlers like this, but you get the picture.

I have another interface like this

Public Interface IEventSinks2
Sub SomethingElseHappened(sender As Object, e As
SomethingElseHappenedEventArgs)
...
End Interface

Then, I have my classes:

Public Class ClassA
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks

...
End Class

Public Class ClassB
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks2

...
End Class

Now, in my main code, I have

Dim obj1 As ClassBase = New ClassA
Dim obj2 As ClassBase = New ClassB

If TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks Then
AddHandler ValueChangedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.ValueChanged
AddHandler StateUpdatedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.StateUpdated

ElseIf TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks2 Then
AddHandler SomethingElseHappenedEventSource, AddressOf
obj1.SomethingElseHappened
Endif
As you can see, even for a couple of event handlers it starts to get a bit
messy, and hard to maintain. In reality, I have seven different object types and eight different interfaces that may or may not be implemented. Depending on the interfaces implemented, I need to notify my classes of different
events.

Is there a more convenient way to hook up handlers based on interfaces
implemented? For example, if my event source class and event handler class
both implement a particular interface, it would be great if I could just
write one line that says "ClassX handles all events raised by ClassY based
on a common interface".

As Cor has already observed, I try to simplify my examples initially and
build them up later, so if what I am trying to do looks odd it could be
because I am paraphrasing.

TIA

Charles

Nov 20 '05 #2
Hi Jay

I think I understand what you mean, in principle, but could you maybe give a
simple example, perhaps based on my sample below? One of the things I have
also to take into account, is that a class may implement multiple
interfaces, so I would need to be able to cater for that as well.

Thanks.

Charles
"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" <Ja************@msn.com> wrote in message
news:OK**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Charles,
Have you considered simply using the Interfaces as the event handlers?

Which effectively is Java's "Event Listener" pattern?

Instead of using AddHandler to add each method of the interface to the
Event, save the Interface variable itself in a collection, when you go to
raise the Event, iterate this collection and call the respective method.

Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ey**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
I have a class, which implements an interface. Let's say, that the

interface
looks something like

Public Interface IEventSinks
Sub ValueChanged(sender As Object, e As ValueChangedEventArgs)
Sub StateUpdated(sender As Object, e As StateUpdatedEventArgs)
End Interface

In practice, the interface contains many more event handlers like this,

but
you get the picture.

I have another interface like this

Public Interface IEventSinks2
Sub SomethingElseHappened(sender As Object, e As
SomethingElseHappenedEventArgs)
...
End Interface

Then, I have my classes:

Public Class ClassA
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks

...
End Class

Public Class ClassB
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks2

...
End Class

Now, in my main code, I have

Dim obj1 As ClassBase = New ClassA
Dim obj2 As ClassBase = New ClassB

If TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks Then
AddHandler ValueChangedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.ValueChanged
AddHandler StateUpdatedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.StateUpdated

ElseIf TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks2 Then
AddHandler SomethingElseHappenedEventSource, AddressOf
obj1.SomethingElseHappened
Endif
As you can see, even for a couple of event handlers it starts to get a bit messy, and hard to maintain. In reality, I have seven different object

types
and eight different interfaces that may or may not be implemented.

Depending
on the interfaces implemented, I need to notify my classes of different
events.

Is there a more convenient way to hook up handlers based on interfaces
implemented? For example, if my event source class and event handler class both implement a particular interface, it would be great if I could just
write one line that says "ClassX handles all events raised by ClassY based on a common interface".

As Cor has already observed, I try to simplify my examples initially and
build them up later, so if what I am trying to do looks odd it could be
because I am paraphrasing.

TIA

Charles


Nov 20 '05 #3
Charles,
You can implement the IEventSinks collection something like:

Public Class EventSinkCollection
Inherits CollectionBase

Public Sub Add(ByVal eventSink As IEventSinks)
Me.InnerList.Add(eventSink)
End Sub

Public Sub Remove(ByVal eventSink As IEventSinks)
Me.InnerList.Remove(eventSink)
End Sub

Public Sub RaiseValueChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As
ValueChangedEventArgs)
For Each sink As IEventSinks In Me.InnerList
sink.ValueChanged(sender, e)
Next
End Sub

Public Sub RaiseStateUpdated(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As
StateUpdatedEventArgs)
For Each sink As IEventSinks In Me.InnerList
sink.StateUpdated(sender, e)
Next
End Sub

End Class

Then when ever you wanted to raise the ValueChanged event you would call
EventSinkCollection.RaiseValueChanged.

The IEventSinks2 collection would be implemented in a similar manner.

Every object that raised the IEventSinks' events would need to have an
instance of the EventSinkCollection object & delegate methods to it.

Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ON*************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Hi Jay

I think I understand what you mean, in principle, but could you maybe give a simple example, perhaps based on my sample below? One of the things I have
also to take into account, is that a class may implement multiple
interfaces, so I would need to be able to cater for that as well.

Thanks.

Charles
"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" <Ja************@msn.com> wrote in message
news:OK**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Charles,
Have you considered simply using the Interfaces as the event handlers?

Which effectively is Java's "Event Listener" pattern?

Instead of using AddHandler to add each method of the interface to the
Event, save the Interface variable itself in a collection, when you go to
raise the Event, iterate this collection and call the respective method.

Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ey**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
I have a class, which implements an interface. Let's say, that the

interface
looks something like

Public Interface IEventSinks
Sub ValueChanged(sender As Object, e As ValueChangedEventArgs)
Sub StateUpdated(sender As Object, e As StateUpdatedEventArgs)
End Interface

In practice, the interface contains many more event handlers like this,
but
you get the picture.

I have another interface like this

Public Interface IEventSinks2
Sub SomethingElseHappened(sender As Object, e As
SomethingElseHappenedEventArgs)
...
End Interface

Then, I have my classes:

Public Class ClassA
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks

...
End Class

Public Class ClassB
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks2

...
End Class

Now, in my main code, I have

Dim obj1 As ClassBase = New ClassA
Dim obj2 As ClassBase = New ClassB

If TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks Then
AddHandler ValueChangedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.ValueChanged
AddHandler StateUpdatedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.StateUpdated

ElseIf TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks2 Then
AddHandler SomethingElseHappenedEventSource, AddressOf
obj1.SomethingElseHappened
Endif
As you can see, even for a couple of event handlers it starts to get a

bit messy, and hard to maintain. In reality, I have seven different object

types
and eight different interfaces that may or may not be implemented.

Depending
on the interfaces implemented, I need to notify my classes of
different events.

Is there a more convenient way to hook up handlers based on interfaces
implemented? For example, if my event source class and event handler

class both implement a particular interface, it would be great if I could just write one line that says "ClassX handles all events raised by ClassY based on a common interface".

As Cor has already observed, I try to simplify my examples initially and build them up later, so if what I am trying to do looks odd it could be because I am paraphrasing.

TIA

Charles



Nov 20 '05 #4
Charles,
You can implement the IEventSinks collection something like:

Public Class EventSinkCollection
Inherits CollectionBase

Public Sub Add(ByVal eventSink As IEventSinks)
Me.InnerList.Add(eventSink)
End Sub

Public Sub Remove(ByVal eventSink As IEventSinks)
Me.InnerList.Remove(eventSink)
End Sub

Public Sub RaiseValueChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As
ValueChangedEventArgs)
For Each sink As IEventSinks In Me.InnerList
sink.ValueChanged(sender, e)
Next
End Sub

Public Sub RaiseStateUpdated(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As
StateUpdatedEventArgs)
For Each sink As IEventSinks In Me.InnerList
sink.StateUpdated(sender, e)
Next
End Sub

End Class

Then when ever you wanted to raise the ValueChanged event you would call
EventSinkCollection.RaiseValueChanged.

The IEventSinks2 collection would be implemented in a similar manner.

Every object that raised the IEventSinks' events would need to have an
instance of the EventSinkCollection object & delegate methods to it.

Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ON*************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Hi Jay

I think I understand what you mean, in principle, but could you maybe give a simple example, perhaps based on my sample below? One of the things I have
also to take into account, is that a class may implement multiple
interfaces, so I would need to be able to cater for that as well.

Thanks.

Charles
"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" <Ja************@msn.com> wrote in message
news:OK**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Charles,
Have you considered simply using the Interfaces as the event handlers?

Which effectively is Java's "Event Listener" pattern?

Instead of using AddHandler to add each method of the interface to the
Event, save the Interface variable itself in a collection, when you go to
raise the Event, iterate this collection and call the respective method.

Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ey**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
I have a class, which implements an interface. Let's say, that the

interface
looks something like

Public Interface IEventSinks
Sub ValueChanged(sender As Object, e As ValueChangedEventArgs)
Sub StateUpdated(sender As Object, e As StateUpdatedEventArgs)
End Interface

In practice, the interface contains many more event handlers like this,
but
you get the picture.

I have another interface like this

Public Interface IEventSinks2
Sub SomethingElseHappened(sender As Object, e As
SomethingElseHappenedEventArgs)
...
End Interface

Then, I have my classes:

Public Class ClassA
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks

...
End Class

Public Class ClassB
Inherits ClassBase
Implements IEventSinks2

...
End Class

Now, in my main code, I have

Dim obj1 As ClassBase = New ClassA
Dim obj2 As ClassBase = New ClassB

If TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks Then
AddHandler ValueChangedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.ValueChanged
AddHandler StateUpdatedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.StateUpdated

ElseIf TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks2 Then
AddHandler SomethingElseHappenedEventSource, AddressOf
obj1.SomethingElseHappened
Endif
As you can see, even for a couple of event handlers it starts to get a

bit messy, and hard to maintain. In reality, I have seven different object

types
and eight different interfaces that may or may not be implemented.

Depending
on the interfaces implemented, I need to notify my classes of
different events.

Is there a more convenient way to hook up handlers based on interfaces
implemented? For example, if my event source class and event handler

class both implement a particular interface, it would be great if I could just write one line that says "ClassX handles all events raised by ClassY based on a common interface".

As Cor has already observed, I try to simplify my examples initially and build them up later, so if what I am trying to do looks odd it could be because I am paraphrasing.

TIA

Charles



Nov 20 '05 #5
Thanks Jay, I get it now.

Charles
"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" <Ja************@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%2******************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Charles,
You can implement the IEventSinks collection something like:

Public Class EventSinkCollection
Inherits CollectionBase

Public Sub Add(ByVal eventSink As IEventSinks)
Me.InnerList.Add(eventSink)
End Sub

Public Sub Remove(ByVal eventSink As IEventSinks)
Me.InnerList.Remove(eventSink)
End Sub

Public Sub RaiseValueChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As
ValueChangedEventArgs)
For Each sink As IEventSinks In Me.InnerList
sink.ValueChanged(sender, e)
Next
End Sub

Public Sub RaiseStateUpdated(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As
StateUpdatedEventArgs)
For Each sink As IEventSinks In Me.InnerList
sink.StateUpdated(sender, e)
Next
End Sub

End Class

Then when ever you wanted to raise the ValueChanged event you would call
EventSinkCollection.RaiseValueChanged.

The IEventSinks2 collection would be implemented in a similar manner.

Every object that raised the IEventSinks' events would need to have an
instance of the EventSinkCollection object & delegate methods to it.

Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ON*************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Hi Jay

I think I understand what you mean, in principle, but could you maybe give
a
simple example, perhaps based on my sample below? One of the things I have also to take into account, is that a class may implement multiple
interfaces, so I would need to be able to cater for that as well.

Thanks.

Charles
"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" <Ja************@msn.com> wrote in message news:OK**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Charles,
Have you considered simply using the Interfaces as the event handlers?

Which effectively is Java's "Event Listener" pattern?

Instead of using AddHandler to add each method of the interface to the
Event, save the Interface variable itself in a collection, when you go to raise the Event, iterate this collection and call the respective method.
Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ey**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I have a class, which implements an interface. Let's say, that the
interface
> looks something like
>
> Public Interface IEventSinks
> Sub ValueChanged(sender As Object, e As ValueChangedEventArgs)
> Sub StateUpdated(sender As Object, e As StateUpdatedEventArgs)
> End Interface
>
> In practice, the interface contains many more event handlers like this, but
> you get the picture.
>
> I have another interface like this
>
> Public Interface IEventSinks2
> Sub SomethingElseHappened(sender As Object, e As
> SomethingElseHappenedEventArgs)
> ...
> End Interface
>
> Then, I have my classes:
>
> Public Class ClassA
> Inherits ClassBase
> Implements IEventSinks
>
> ...
> End Class
>
> Public Class ClassB
> Inherits ClassBase
> Implements IEventSinks2
>
> ...
> End Class
>
> Now, in my main code, I have
>
> Dim obj1 As ClassBase = New ClassA
> Dim obj2 As ClassBase = New ClassB
>
> If TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks Then
> AddHandler ValueChangedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.ValueChanged
> AddHandler StateUpdatedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.StateUpdated
>
> ElseIf TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks2 Then
> AddHandler SomethingElseHappenedEventSource, AddressOf
> obj1.SomethingElseHappened
> Endif
>
>
> As you can see, even for a couple of event handlers it starts to get a bit
> messy, and hard to maintain. In reality, I have seven different
object types
> and eight different interfaces that may or may not be implemented.
Depending
> on the interfaces implemented, I need to notify my classes of

different > events.
>
> Is there a more convenient way to hook up handlers based on interfaces > implemented? For example, if my event source class and event handler

class
> both implement a particular interface, it would be great if I could just > write one line that says "ClassX handles all events raised by ClassY

based
> on a common interface".
>
> As Cor has already observed, I try to simplify my examples initially and > build them up later, so if what I am trying to do looks odd it could be > because I am paraphrasing.
>
> TIA
>
> Charles
>
>



Nov 20 '05 #6
Thanks Jay, I get it now.

Charles
"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" <Ja************@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%2******************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Charles,
You can implement the IEventSinks collection something like:

Public Class EventSinkCollection
Inherits CollectionBase

Public Sub Add(ByVal eventSink As IEventSinks)
Me.InnerList.Add(eventSink)
End Sub

Public Sub Remove(ByVal eventSink As IEventSinks)
Me.InnerList.Remove(eventSink)
End Sub

Public Sub RaiseValueChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As
ValueChangedEventArgs)
For Each sink As IEventSinks In Me.InnerList
sink.ValueChanged(sender, e)
Next
End Sub

Public Sub RaiseStateUpdated(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As
StateUpdatedEventArgs)
For Each sink As IEventSinks In Me.InnerList
sink.StateUpdated(sender, e)
Next
End Sub

End Class

Then when ever you wanted to raise the ValueChanged event you would call
EventSinkCollection.RaiseValueChanged.

The IEventSinks2 collection would be implemented in a similar manner.

Every object that raised the IEventSinks' events would need to have an
instance of the EventSinkCollection object & delegate methods to it.

Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ON*************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Hi Jay

I think I understand what you mean, in principle, but could you maybe give
a
simple example, perhaps based on my sample below? One of the things I have also to take into account, is that a class may implement multiple
interfaces, so I would need to be able to cater for that as well.

Thanks.

Charles
"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" <Ja************@msn.com> wrote in message news:OK**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Charles,
Have you considered simply using the Interfaces as the event handlers?

Which effectively is Java's "Event Listener" pattern?

Instead of using AddHandler to add each method of the interface to the
Event, save the Interface variable itself in a collection, when you go to raise the Event, iterate this collection and call the respective method.
Hope this helps
Jay

"Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ey**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I have a class, which implements an interface. Let's say, that the
interface
> looks something like
>
> Public Interface IEventSinks
> Sub ValueChanged(sender As Object, e As ValueChangedEventArgs)
> Sub StateUpdated(sender As Object, e As StateUpdatedEventArgs)
> End Interface
>
> In practice, the interface contains many more event handlers like this, but
> you get the picture.
>
> I have another interface like this
>
> Public Interface IEventSinks2
> Sub SomethingElseHappened(sender As Object, e As
> SomethingElseHappenedEventArgs)
> ...
> End Interface
>
> Then, I have my classes:
>
> Public Class ClassA
> Inherits ClassBase
> Implements IEventSinks
>
> ...
> End Class
>
> Public Class ClassB
> Inherits ClassBase
> Implements IEventSinks2
>
> ...
> End Class
>
> Now, in my main code, I have
>
> Dim obj1 As ClassBase = New ClassA
> Dim obj2 As ClassBase = New ClassB
>
> If TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks Then
> AddHandler ValueChangedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.ValueChanged
> AddHandler StateUpdatedEventSource, AddressOf obj1.StateUpdated
>
> ElseIf TypeOf obj1 Is IEventSinks2 Then
> AddHandler SomethingElseHappenedEventSource, AddressOf
> obj1.SomethingElseHappened
> Endif
>
>
> As you can see, even for a couple of event handlers it starts to get a bit
> messy, and hard to maintain. In reality, I have seven different
object types
> and eight different interfaces that may or may not be implemented.
Depending
> on the interfaces implemented, I need to notify my classes of

different > events.
>
> Is there a more convenient way to hook up handlers based on interfaces > implemented? For example, if my event source class and event handler

class
> both implement a particular interface, it would be great if I could just > write one line that says "ClassX handles all events raised by ClassY

based
> on a common interface".
>
> As Cor has already observed, I try to simplify my examples initially and > build them up later, so if what I am trying to do looks odd it could be > because I am paraphrasing.
>
> TIA
>
> Charles
>
>



Nov 20 '05 #7

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

21
by: Franco Gustavo | last post by:
Hi, Please help me to understand this, because I don't see what I'm missing. I was reading a lot of examples on Internet that explain that C# doesn't implement multiple inheritance it...
3
by: Dan | last post by:
Good Day All, I have an application that processes several tasks. Depending upon the task it instantiates the appropriate object to do the actual work. Since I wanted the application to be...
0
by: zeng.hui.stephen | last post by:
I download the demo http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/10/cuttingedge/. I inherite the demo, and write my code. I want to use Hook to monitor C++ Edit change. I use a C# form...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
0
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.