I think my problem is one of perception. Some of the
replies here follow my manager's same agruments - if it
ain't broke.....
but that's not what I'm talking about. I have no
intention of doing a full blown port to .net. I agree
that it works fine, no performance issues, no UI issues,
etc. What I am trying to convince him of is the need for
NEW development to be done in .net.
Specifically, we have a project coming up that I
estimated to be 6-8 months (awaiting final spec). I
think we could do it in about the same time with .net,
including the ramp up time needed to get used to a new
dev system.
The project is essentially a web service that will serve
financial and investment information to our new business
partner, who has a public site for their clients. It is
my contention that the service, and the other
requirements, offer the perfect opportunity to move to
the new platform. THEN, as we have time, and updates are
needed for the existing code, we could slowly port piece
by piece.
-----Original Message-----
"VBCodr" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:<00****************************@phx.gbl>... This has all been very useful.
Thanks!
In my experience we have seen dramatic improvements in
performancewith ASP.NET over ASP.
This give a lot more room to grow with a web project.
HTH
.