By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
455,887 Members | 1,249 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 455,887 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Resources for Project Architecture

P: n/a
One of the challenges we have is to develop applications
in a modular fashion so that parts of a system can be
changed without requiring a full release.

To date our experiences of ActiveX has not been good.

Anyway I was wondering if .NET comes with a better way of
developing modular applications where we need to insulate
changes in one module from another ?

Nov 20 '05 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
1 Reply


P: n/a
Hello,

"zakhurst" <st*********@instem-lss.co.uk> schrieb:
One of the challenges we have is to develop applications
in a modular fashion so that parts of a system can be
changed without requiring a full release.

To date our experiences of ActiveX has not been good.

Anyway I was wondering if .NET comes with a better way of
developing modular applications where we need to insulate
changes in one module from another ?


You can use .NET Class Libararies instead of ActiveX-DLLs.

--
Herfried K. Wagner
MVP VB Classic, VB.NET
http://www.mvps.org/dotnet
Nov 20 '05 #2

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.