Absolutely Agree. I've written many a network admin tool for non-technical
users to easily manage accounts and etc.
--
HTH,
-- Tom Spink, Über Geek
Please respond to the newsgroup,
so all can benefit
"Maybe it's a game called 'Punish the User'"
"Paul Clement" <Us***********************@swspectrum.com> wrote in message
news:js********************************@4ax.com...
: On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:39:12 +0100, "Nak" <a@a.com> wrote:
:
: ¤ > No need to act ignorant.
: ¤
: ¤ Well thanks for the advice Mr Clement, I shall take your thoughts into
mind.
: ¤
: ¤ > Requirements for these types of tools is not uncommon.
: ¤
: ¤ Personally I am not bothered whether people ask for code to mess other
: ¤ peoples systems up or not. But just recently someone was asking for
"ideas"
: ¤ on what they could do to play a joke on a work associate, I gave
suggestions
: ¤ and everyone else thought it was "bad", though he *only* wanted ideas.
: ¤
: ¤ Now when someone asks how you disable accounts via code I wouldn't have
: ¤ thought that there would have been an influx of answers, as this is
allot
: ¤ more serious than playing a simple joke on a work associate. Personally
I
: ¤ couldn't, nor can I still see the point in making software to do this,
so
: ¤ no, I was not "acting ignorant", but thanks for your concern anyway.
:
: Sometimes you need to provide access to your system to enable customers to
manage their users that
: work with your (typically web based) system. For obvious reasons you
wouldn't necessarily want to
: provide them with the standard set of tools. ;-)
:
: Having an interface API (such as ADSI or System.DirectoryServices which
will address the original
: question) enables you to provide only those features required, thereby
limiting the administrative
: functionality that is actually available.
:
:
: Paul ~~~
pc******@ameritech.net
: Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)