This is very strange: I have a Windows Form with a Panel on it. In that
panel I dynamically (at run time) create some labels, as so:
for i=1 to x
dim ctlNew as New Label()
with ctlNew
.Name="Whatever" & trim(cstr(i))
.Text=.Name
.Visible=True
... etc etc etc ...
end with
MyPanel.Controls.Add(ctlNew)
This shows up fine when the form is displayed. However, I also have a reset
button on the form, which goes thru and destroys the labels, as such:
dim ctl as Control
for each ctl in MyPanel.Controls
if typeof ctl is Label then
ctl.text=""
ctl.visible=False
ctl.Dispose()
end if
next
OK, here is the WIERD thing: The For...Each loop only seems to pick up the
EVEN or ODD numbered controls! It skips some of the controls (i.e. the odd
ones).... if I rerun the loop about three times, one right after the other,
it will finally pick up all the controls and get rid of them.
I -think- the code is correct - I even added a ctl=Nothing before and/or
after the ctl.Dispose(), but it didn't help. The For...Each loop just seems
the skip some of the label controls during its run. I am baffled ... even
though it is probably something dumb that I am doing.
Anyone got any ideas on this?
Tom
112  3904 
Tom, dim ctl as Control
for each ctl in MyPanel.Controls
if typeof ctl is Label then
ctl.text=""
ctl.visible=False
ctl.Dispose()
end if
next
I think that the collections in the for each loop is changed in the the for
each loop
I think that nicer is
For i = Me.Controls.Count To 0 Step -1
Dim ctl As Control
it typeof ctl is Label then
Me.Controls.Remove(ctl)
Next
I hope this helps
Cor
Why don't you just set the labels to nothing? Dispose is called by the GC.
All you really have to do it kill your reference to the object. Let the GC
take care of the rest.
"Tom" <To*@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ed**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... This is very strange: I have a Windows Form with a Panel on it. In that
panel I dynamically (at run time) create some labels, as so:
for i=1 to x
dim ctlNew as New Label()
with ctlNew
.Name="Whatever" & trim(cstr(i))
.Text=.Name
.Visible=True
... etc etc etc ...
end with
MyPanel.Controls.Add(ctlNew)
This shows up fine when the form is displayed. However, I also have a
reset button on the form, which goes thru and destroys the labels, as such:
dim ctl as Control
for each ctl in MyPanel.Controls
if typeof ctl is Label then
ctl.text=""
ctl.visible=False
ctl.Dispose()
end if
next
OK, here is the WIERD thing: The For...Each loop only seems to pick up the
EVEN or ODD numbered controls! It skips some of the controls (i.e. the odd
ones).... if I rerun the loop about three times, one right after the
other, it will finally pick up all the controls and get rid of them.
I -think- the code is correct - I even added a ctl=Nothing before and/or
after the ctl.Dispose(), but it didn't help. The For...Each loop just
seems the skip some of the label controls during its run. I am baffled ... even
though it is probably something dumb that I am doing.
Anyone got any ideas on this?
Tom
Isn't Controls.Count a one-based index? I think it should be:
For i = Me.Controls.Count -1 To 0 Step -1
....
"Cor" <no*@non.com> wrote in message
news:3f***********************@reader21.wxs.nl... Tom, dim ctl as Control
for each ctl in MyPanel.Controls
if typeof ctl is Label then
ctl.text=""
ctl.visible=False
ctl.Dispose()
end if
next I think that the collections in the for each loop is changed in the the
for each loop
I think that nicer is
For i = Me.Controls.Count To 0 Step -1
Dim ctl As Control
it typeof ctl is Label then
Me.Controls.Remove(ctl)
Next
I hope this helps
Cor
Yea, stupid me, I just figured this out when everyone replied. Sheesh, I
should have seen that. Anyway, I'll go in reverse and remove the items that
way. Thanks.
Tom
"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:um**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... OK, here is the WIERD thing: The For...Each loop only seems to pick up
the EVEN or ODD numbered controls! It skips some of the controls (i.e. the
odd ones).... if I rerun the loop about three times, one right after the other, it will finally pick up all the controls and get rid of them.
I have "an" idea, maybe it's because you are removing a control from the
collection in the loop, for example if you used a For loop and removed
controls without taking away 1 from the final index you would over run and
skip controls in a similar way. Maybe try using an integer controlled for
loop and every time you remove a control take away 1 from the counter and
1 from the final index. I've attached an example, excuse the type checking
code, I know it's bad, also I have added a button to simulate the problem
you are getting at current.
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
"Cor" <no*@non.com> wrote in message
news:3f***********************@reader21.wxs.nl... Tom, dim ctl as Control
for each ctl in MyPanel.Controls
if typeof ctl is Label then
ctl.text=""
ctl.visible=False
ctl.Dispose()
end if
next I think that the collections in the for each loop is changed in the the
for each loop
I think that nicer is
For i = Me.Controls.Count To 0 Step -1
Dim ctl As Control
it typeof ctl is Label then
Me.Controls.Remove(ctl)
Next
I hope this helps
Cor
It doesn't help when you post bad code that doesn't work, despite your good
intentions.
You also might want to learn when to use While or Do loops instead of
misusing a For loop.
Robert
You are right, just forgot to type.
Thanks for your attention.
Cor
"Scott Meddows" <sc******************@tsged.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Why don't you just set the labels to nothing? Dispose is called by the
GC. All you really have to do it kill your reference to the object. Let the
GC take care of the rest.
Because that won't work for controls. Controls are referenced by their
container, so it doesn't matter whether you set all code references to
nothing: the container will still hold a reference until you remove the
control or the container itself.
Jack.
Yes I mistyped the -1 but that can every programmer with a little expirience
see.
Robert was so kind to tell that.
But show that you can do it better, send a good working code in this
situation with the do while loop.
Cor
Then you'd have to loop through a loop and do the
container.controls.remove(YourForEachLoopControl) ?
"Jack Spry" <js***@nospammers.com> wrote in message
news:OG**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
"Scott Meddows" <sc******************@tsged.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Why don't you just set the labels to nothing? Dispose is called by the
GC. All you really have to do it kill your reference to the object. Let the
GC take care of the rest.
Because that won't work for controls. Controls are referenced by their
container, so it doesn't matter whether you set all code references to
nothing: the container will still hold a reference until you remove the
control or the container itself.
"Cor" <no*@non.com> wrote in message
news:3f**********************@reader21.wxs.nl... Jack.
Yes I mistyped the -1 but that can every programmer with a little
expirience see.
Robert was so kind to tell that.
Apparently, you fail to see why your code won't work. Here's a hint: the
if statement always evalutes to false.
But show that you can do it better, send a good working code in this
situation with the do while loop.
Maybe you should post code that works before you command others to do so,
padawan.
"Jack Spry" <js***@nospammers.com> schrieb: You also might want to learn when to use While or
Do loops instead of misusing a For loop.
If you have a working solution, feel free to post it. Do not shout at other
people there if you do not contribute to the ng.
--
Herfried K. Wagner
MVP · VB Classic, VB.NET http://www.mvps.org/dotnet
Hi,
The example code was full of typing errors, it was ment as an example.
But because there are maybe real beginners looking to it, who can not
evaluate that, under the typed example from what I think that will work on a
form. For i = Me.Controls.Count To 0 Step -1
Dim ctl As Control
it typeof ctl is Label then
Me.Controls.Remove(ctl)
There is not even an if in this example but an it..
\\\\\\
Dim i As Integer
For i = Me.Controls.Count - 1 To 0 Step -1 'As something with what I
always must think to Armin
Dim ctrl As Control = Me.Controls.Item(i)
If TypeOf ctrl Is Label Then
Me.Controls.Remove(ctrl)
End If
Next
/////
Cor
Hi Jack Padawan,
There is no If in it, that is also a typing error, but don't give critique
Come with that nice example with a "do while loop".
We are waiting
Cor
"Scott Meddows" <sc******************@tsged.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Then you'd have to loop through a loop and do the
container.controls.remove(YourForEachLoopControl) ?
Yes, you need to remove the controls from the container, as well as any
event handlers that were attached, if necessary. There are several ways to
do that, depending on the circumstances. Since removing controls
dynamically changes the container, it would be best not to use a looping
structure such as ForEach to iterate over the contents, since this is
pulling the rug out from under yourself.
Come with your Example, but we will see, tomorrow there is nothing and the
day after tomorrow again
Hi Jack,
Shame you're having a bad week. Still, you're always welcome to come here
and inappropriately vent your spleen. We like to be helpful. If we can't do
that then we're happy to be punchbags for people with a bit a of anger and
frustration.
Hope this helps.
NOT
Fergus
> Yea, stupid me, I just figured this out when everyone replied. Sheesh, I should have seen that. Anyway, I'll go in reverse and remove the items
that way. Thanks.
Hi,
Yeah, that would make sence :-) Never mind.
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Still here Jack ?
|| Yes, you need to remove ..... blah, blah, .....
|| ..... best not to use a looping structure .....
|| since this is pulling the rug out from under yourself.
And we've <yet> to see your code contribution. Don't just criticise and talk
about it. Post the code. It's no challenge for a man of your calibre is it?
Fergus
> Come with your Example, but we will see, tomorrow there is nothing and the day after tomorrow again
Hi there,
Technically speaking what Jack says is correct. But that doesn't
account for the manner in which he is conducting himself at the moment.
Jack, please notice that this is a newsgroup for people wanting to learn
VB.NET as well as for people wanting to pool their knowledge of it. Fair
enough we all have a pop at each other now and then, but there is usually a
good reason for it, remember that when people post code it hasn't always
been tested, it's just been posted to show an example, this is called pseudo
code. So calm down a little please, you will only make yourself unpopular
here.
The problem is solved now anyway, so why the need to argue?
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
> And we've <yet> to see your code contribution. Don't just criticise and
talk about it. Post the code. It's no challenge for a man of your calibre is
it?
Hi Fergus,
LOL! My that's a mighty spoon of much spoon'ness that you have in your
very hands!
Smite him so!! ;-)
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
"Fergus Cooney" <fi******@tesco.net> wrote in message
news:uJ**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Hi Jack,
Shame you're having a bad week. Still, you're always welcome to come
here and inappropriately vent your spleen. We like to be helpful. If we can't
do that then we're happy to be punchbags for people with a bit a of anger and
frustration.
Hope this helps.
NOT
My week is going quite nicely. Perhaps you fail to distinguish between
legitimate code criticism and flaming. I'm less inclined to post code when
someone _demands_ that I do so, particularly when they obviously haven't
even bothered to see if their own code compiles, or even works, before I
have the opportunity to volunteer my own suggestion. Only the people who
pay me get the right to dictate how and when I write code for them.
Nick,
Armin, Jay B and someone else where arguing about this subject a while ago
in this newsgroup.
(Armin not realy he was keeping his mouth, I think he knew that he was
right)
I did contribute not much, just evaluating and testing what Jay and the
otherone (It is a regular one but I forgot who it was) where saying.
At the end we could see, that the reverse indexed for loop that Armin had
supplied was the best.
In my mind I was started with do while, but when you evaluate and test that
will give unpredictable errors.
Therefore I gladly like to see a good working do while for deleting controls
with less code than Armins one.
The one that Armin had added was only
For i = 1 to col-1 step -1
But there was in my eyes an other error with the dispose, I did want to show
that too.
Therefore I added some lines, without testing it was the remove I did want
to show.
So I am waiting on the nice do while routine.
So technical it is not wrong and I think that was just to prickle me.
:-)
Cor
> someone _demands_ that I do so, particularly when they obviously haven't even bothered to see if their own code compiles, or even works, before I
Hi Jack,
It's called "Psuedo code" okay?
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
"Cor" <no*@non.com> wrote in message
news:3f***********************@reader20.wxs.nl... Hi Jack Padawan,
There is no If in it, that is also a typing error, but don't give critique
I am not attempting to point out any typographical errors (of which there
are many, but that's besides the point.)
You have declared a reference variable 'ctl' but have failed to assign it to
anything, and then you evaluate to see what type it contains - which will
always be Nothing.
Come with that nice example with a "do while loop".
We are waiting
Cor
Perhaps your time is best spent attempting to write code that works while
you're waiting for my solution. I was in the process of posting such code
myself, until I read your childish flurry of posts demanding that I do so.
Unlike yourself, I prefer to post code that works, and sometimes that takes
more than a few minutes to do. You have no right to demand anything from
me, particularly with the quality of the code you've posted to this point.
I fully expect that you'll continue to incessantly post your childish
demands for me to do so, however I'll go ahead and post it for the benefit
of the group, despite your taunts.
I'm also in the habit of actually testing any code that I post to be sure
that it works, which might be a foreign concept to you. However, I'm not
posting from my development system, so I was waiting to do so in a few
hours. Since nobody here is willing to cut me a f...in' break, I'll go
ahead and post without doing so, but only under duress. I fully expect that
you'll choose to jump on any error in my post, however trivial it may be,
instead of providing working code of your own making, but I guess that's
something I'll have to risk to keep you from posting several dozen messages
in the next hour or two.
Dim idx As Integer
idx = 0
While idx < MyPanel.Controls.Count ' while in bounds
if typeof MyPanel.Controls.Item(idx) is Label then
MyPanel.Controls.RemoveAt(idx)
else
idx = idx + 1 ' otherwise advance to next control
end if
End While
> It's called "Psuedo code" okay?
Spelling mistakes 'no all, "Pseudo" rather.
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Hi Cor,
You won't get any code out of Jack!, maybe allot of bullshit but not
code!
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... It's called "Psuedo code" okay?
Spelling mistakes 'no all, "Pseudo" rather.
Nick.
Pseudocode has nothing to do with bad VB.NET code that doesn't work. Now
that you've looked up the spelling, you might as well also look up the
meaning.
"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:eQ**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Hi Cor,
You won't get any code out of Jack!, maybe allot of bullshit but not
code!
So why don't you post your code?
Hi Jack,
|| My week is going quite nicely.
Like I care.
|| Perhaps you fail to distinguish between
|| legitimate code criticism and flaming.
I distinguish very subtle differences in tone. I detected in yours hints
of smirk and holier-than-thou. Legitimate code criticism is done with
sensitivity. Yours was not apparent.
|| I'm less inclined to post code when someone _demands_ that I do so
But you're quite happy to make demands on others.
|| particularly when they obviously haven't even
|| bothered to see if their own code compiles
As everyone has pointed out - this is a pseudo point.
|| Only the people who pay me get the right to dictate
|| how and when I write code for them.
I pity you. The people who pay me dictate <what> I write for them. They
pay me to know the how. And they trust me enough to give me great self
determination over the when.
Yours, with more than a hint of smirk and superiority, and self-righteous this
and that,
Fergus
ps. Thank you for the opportunity to vent my spleen, anger and frustration.
Mr. Padawan,
Maybe you cannot type that fast, but for you start to try that, take a look
at the answering post from Tom.
Cor
"Fergus Cooney" <fi******@tesco.net> wrote in message
news:u0**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Hi Jack,
ps. Thank you for the opportunity to vent my spleen, anger and
frustration.
Yes, you would rather do that than post your own solution, hypocrite.
"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:eQ**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Hi Cor,
You won't get any code out of Jack!, maybe allot of bullshit but not
code!
I'm still waiting for your code.
"Cor" <no*@non.com> wrote in message
news:3f***********************@reader20.wxs.nl... Come with your Example, but we will see, tomorrow there is nothing and the
day after tomorrow again
Let's see who was the first one to post a _working_ example. Put up, or
shut up yourself. I know that you'd rather challenge me than write code
that works,so my code's posted. Where's yours? I'm still waiting. What's
the hold up on your end? Too busy posting flames to write code that works?
> I am not attempting to point out any typographical errors (of which there are many, but that's besides the point.)
Nice contradiction Jack!
You have declared a reference variable 'ctl' but have failed to assign it
to anything, and then you evaluate to see what type it contains - which will
always be Nothing.
That's because it was untested pseudo code, is that such a big deal? It
wasn't even your question in the first place so why are you getting so
emotional Jack?
Perhaps your time is best spent attempting to write code that works while
you're waiting for my solution. I was in the process of posting such code
myself, until I read your childish flurry of posts demanding that I do so.
Unlike yourself, I prefer to post code that works, and sometimes that
takes more than a few minutes to do. You have no right to demand anything from
me, particularly with the quality of the code you've posted to this point.
I fully expect that you'll continue to incessantly post your childish
demands for me to do so, however I'll go ahead and post it for the benefit
of the group, despite your taunts.
You are totally right, no one has the right to demand anything from you, but
on the other hand they have every right to treat you like a c*nt if you act
like one! And don't worry, he won't be the only one to flame you in this
newsgroup, I should imagine plenty of other people would gladly oblige Jack!
I'm also in the habit of actually testing any code that I post to be sure
that it works, which might be a foreign concept to you. However, I'm not
posting from my development system, so I was waiting to do so in a few
hours. Since nobody here is willing to cut me a f...in' break, I'll go
ahead and post without doing so, but only under duress. I fully expect
that you'll choose to jump on any error in my post, however trivial it may be,
instead of providing working code of your own making, but I guess that's
something I'll have to risk to keep you from posting several dozen
messages in the next hour or two.
Development system huh? You're getting flash, so what are you using now
then? You're gaming system maybe, and you have been disturbed half way
through a game, that's why you're upset? Oh no wait, no one is willing to
cut you a "f...in' break", has that got anything to do with you being an
uptight self-righteous bastard that has obviously got out of bed on the
wrong side? I don't think that this has got anything to do with code
anymore? Do you Jack?
Maybe you might want to take a look at the amount of people that Cor
actually helps. I must admit that I have had arguments with Cor in the
past, but this was simply due to his misunderstanding of my posts. But this
on the other hand is simply down to you trying to flex some programming
muscle in the newsgroup, and just looking like a small girl in lilac who has
just dropped her dummy out of the pram. There is no law saying that you
cannot write pseudo code in a newsgroup, most people are smart enough to
work their way around it, and if not it gives them an incentive to. What
would you think is the best way to learn? like a parrot of with guidance,
what way Jack?
You also seem very defensive about writing any mistakes, I wonder why that
is, anything to do with you making a big mistake by starting all of this in
the first place? Are you all right Jack? Well are you Jack?
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
"Jack Spry" <js***@nospammers.com> wrote in message
news:O9**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
"Cor" <no*@non.com> wrote in message
news:3f***********************@reader20.wxs.nl... Hi Jack Padawan,
There is no If in it, that is also a typing error, but don't give
critique
Come with that nice example with a "do while loop".
We are waiting
Cor
Dim idx As Integer
idx = 0
While idx < MyPanel.Controls.Count ' while in bounds
if typeof MyPanel.Controls.Item(idx) is Label then
MyPanel.Controls.RemoveAt(idx)
else
idx = idx + 1 ' otherwise advance to next control
end if
End While
Nick's code was posted several hours ago!!
"Pseudo" - synonym of spurious, as in "Jack spouted spurious arguments".
"Cor" <no*@non.com> wrote in message
news:3f**********************@reader22.wxs.nl... Mr. Padawan,
Maybe you cannot type that fast, but for you start to try that, take a
look at the answering post from Tom.
Cor
If you spent more time reading than posting, you might actually learn
something.
> Pseudocode has nothing to do with bad VB.NET code that doesn't work. Now that you've looked up the spelling, you might as well also look up the
meaning.
For who's benefit, yours? Everyone else here is smart enough to know what
it means, it's the outline of code, it doesn't have to function correctly
but simply give a logical outline that should provide the final solution.
Pseudo code can also have errors in it strangely enough, for example,
1. Flame Cor's code aggressively in newsgroup
2. While receiving flack from doing the above
2.1 Act like a complete tosser
2.2 Become very unpopular in the newsgroup
2.3 End While
3. Leave, with tail between legs.
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
> Let's see who was the first one to post a _working_ example. Put up, or shut up yourself. I know that you'd rather challenge me than write code
that works,so my code's posted. Where's yours? I'm still waiting.
What's the hold up on your end? Too busy posting flames to write code that
works?
Bingo, it was myself JACK, in the form of a Zip file.
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
> I'm still waiting for your code.
Try pulling your head out of your arse then Jack, I submitted code in the
form of a zip file. If you can't be bothered to read the other posts first
then is this really going to go anywhere? Happy Jack?
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
> "Pseudo" - synonym of spurious, as in "Jack spouted spurious
arguments".
Couldn't be closer to the truth Fergus, apparently I haven't submitted any
code! Strange that, I could have sworn I wrote some an put it into a zip
file. It may not have been the best of code, but that's usually what
happens when you are eager to help someone out. Do you think Jack is
alright? I feel that he might have burst a blood vessel whilst inserting
his head up his arse.
Nick,
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:Ox**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... I am not attempting to point out any typographical errors (of which
there are many, but that's besides the point.)
Nice contradiction Jack!
You have declared a reference variable 'ctl' but have failed to assign
it to anything, and then you evaluate to see what type it contains - which
will always be Nothing.
That's because it was untested pseudo code, is that such a big deal? It
wasn't even your question in the first place so why are you getting so
emotional Jack?
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudocode
Code that doesn't work isn't pseudocode. It's merely bad code. The whole
point of pseudocode is to focus on the meaning rather than the
implementation, not to explain away implementation code that doesn't work.
Here's some pseudocode:
For every Nak
drop dead
I wish there was a listing for Pseudoprogrammer, which up till now, is all
that you've shown yourself to be in this thread.
It seems pointless to discuss anything here with you. You're more
interested in flaming than code, pseudo or real.
"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Pseudocode has nothing to do with bad VB.NET code that doesn't work.
Now that you've looked up the spelling, you might as well also look up the
meaning.
For who's benefit, yours? Everyone else here is smart enough to know what
it means, it's the outline of code, it doesn't have to function correctly
but simply give a logical outline that should provide the final solution.
Pseudo code can also have errors in it strangely enough, for example,
1. Flame Cor's code aggressively in newsgroup
2. While receiving flack from doing the above
2.1 Act like a complete tosser
2.2 Become very unpopular in the newsgroup
2.3 End While
3. Leave, with tail between legs.
I'm still waiting for your code.
> It seems pointless to discuss anything here with you. You're more interested in flaming than code, pseudo or real.
And you know the meaning of the word discuss do you Jack?
I think we may have just found the god of programmers,
All bow to Jack,
He is the ultimate coder,
The master blaster of basic,
The perfectionist of polymorphism,
The Jack of all,
and the master of none.
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
> I'm still waiting for your code.
LOL! Your utter stupidity makes me crawl inside of my very skin, are you
feeling a tad on the sexually frustrated side? Again Jack, just for your
benefit, pull your head out of your arse and look, I submitted it in the
form of a zip, to which I received a warm reply, one of which you will
probably never receive with an attitude like that!
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... "Pseudo" - synonym of spurious, as in "Jack spouted spurious
arguments".
Couldn't be closer to the truth Fergus, apparently I haven't submitted any
code! Strange that, I could have sworn I wrote some an put it into a zip
file. It may not have been the best of code, but that's usually what
happens when you are eager to help someone out. Do you think Jack is
alright? I feel that he might have burst a blood vessel whilst inserting
his head up his arse.
Yes, I see that you did. It's pathetic code, but there it is. I missed it
amidst the flurry of flames that you've posted. What's the point of using
a FOR NEXT structure when you manage the iterator index yourself. That's a
nice way to obfuscate a perfectly simple algorithm. But I guess that you're
satisfied to get something working at all, regardless of the technique.
Still wishing for a GOTO to simplify your code?
"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:%2******************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... I'm still waiting for your code.
LOL! Your utter stupidity makes me crawl inside of my very skin, are you
feeling a tad on the sexually frustrated side? Again Jack, just for your
benefit, pull your head out of your arse and look, I submitted it in the
form of a zip, to which I received a warm reply, one of which you will
probably never receive with an attitude like that!
Tell your shrink that you're projecting your emotions again.
My former boss, an old-timer from a small town in Montana, had many words of
wisdom. One that I'll always remember is, "don't get into a pissing contest
with a skunk."
What's the point in a flamewar over who's the biggest jerk? (I think the
answer's obvious to everyone except Jack.)
Cor and Nak pointed Tom in the right direction. Several hours ago, Tom
replied "problem solved." What's the point in continuing this thread?
"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:O3*************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... It seems pointless to discuss anything here with you. You're more
interested in flaming than code, pseudo or real.
And you know the meaning of the word discuss do you Jack?
I think we may have just found the god of programmers,
All bow to Jack,
He is the ultimate coder,
The master blaster of basic,
The perfectionist of polymorphism,
The Jack of all,
and the master of none.
Nick.
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Slow internet connection?
Having problems with you job?
You're marriage is on the rocks?
You can't sleep at night?
You have a drink and drugs addiction?
You are sexually impotent?
Then enable Option Strict!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Nick,
Your code is not on every newsserver, but when you see the answer from Tom,
you can see you did send it via a newsgroup.
The code from mr Padawan works.
But he is using a selfmade index in a while loop.
I thought it would be something as
In psuedo code
Do While panel.count > 0
remove(0)
loop
What we see is a program from just behind the goto's time.
Cor
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Qun Cao |
last post by:
Hello,
I am just starting to play threading in python, here is a really
interesting problem I am very curious about:
"
import thread
def main():
thread.start_new(test.())
def test():
|
by: Niranjan |
last post by:
Access XP
Windows XP
This code has been working for over 5 years with no problems and all
of a sudden I am running into these wierd problems.
I have this code to delete a record....
|
by: paul reed |
last post by:
Hello,
I am having some weird behavior between two machines...one
which is running the 1.1 framework and one which is
running 1.0. After opening a child form from a parent...I
update the...
|
by: Michael Loughry |
last post by:
I'm working for a company in Houston developing a web application. At one
point in the code, we have to refresh the page, but save what checkboxes have
been selected. Since these checkboxes are...
|
by: SStory |
last post by:
I am trying to make a splash screen for my vb.net app.
It is an mdi app.
including the splash code produces wierd results.
not inluding makes things fine.
Also have tried loading the splash...
|
by: Tom |
last post by:
OK, here's a wierd one... I have a listbox, which I fill with strings (in my
case, file names). I normally load this via a loop, adding each item to the
list box in the loop. I put lb.BeginUpdate...
|
by: Tom |
last post by:
We are experiencing some wierd debugging behavior. What happens is
that, during debugging with VS 2003, the debugger seems to 'skip'
statements that are associated with database operations. For...
|
by: Tom |
last post by:
I have some very strange issues with combo boxes on a tab control.
Here's the scenario: I have a Windows Forms form that has a tab control
on it, with two (2) tabs. Tab 2 happens to have a number...
|
by: Muthu Arumugam |
last post by:
Tried the following c# code
static void Main(string args)
{
ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
int i = 10;
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| |
