In article <u1*****************************@40tude.net>,
jo*****@hotmail.com says...
I am planning to build a server to be used as a SQL Server and web server.
Right now I can only use a single box for both.
I have read some threads were dual processors are having problems with some
parallel queries and the suggestions of having sql server use a single CPU.
My budget is limited so I am debating whether to get 2.6G dual xeon 533FSB
or dual P4 800FSB (DRR@ ram) or stick with a speedy single cpu.
If I get a dual cpu motherboard, is it a good idea to have 1 cpu used for
sql server and the other for everything else?
John, you can't use Dual P4's any more, Intel fixed that after the P3.
If you want to build a cheap but fast SQL Server, assuming SQL 2000 or
higher, tape a look at the ASUS PC-DL Deluxe motherboard. I have about
30 of these running the following:
ASUS PC-DL Deluxe
Dua Xeon 2.4G (or faster) (make sure they are same lot/part)
2GB or 4GB of RAM (does not require ECC RAM)
It has onboard SATA and IDE, you can use a total of 6 drives between the
connectors without a problem.
The 2GB systems with Dual 250GB SATA drives, video, case, CD-ROM, etc...
are under $1900 each.
If you want a big box, like this:
PC-DL Deluxe
Dual Xeon 2.8ghz
2 x 80GB IDE (OS = 12GB, LOGS = 60GB)
6 x 250GB IDE (for DATA files)
Promise SX6000 Hardware IDE RAID Controller (hot swap IDE drives)
cheap video
Chenbro Server case with Dual 550W PSU's
and Windows 2003 Standard Server 5cal
This box runs about $4000
I run SQL 2000 on Dual P3 and Dual/Quad Xeon without any problems.
If you get a P4, get one that does Hyper-Threading, and use Server 2003
so that you get the most benefit from it.
As for Athlon, faster is a matter of what task is being performed and
how stable you want the system to be. When it comes to business systems
I use Intel CPU's only, but that's a personal preference and has never
cost me a job or stability.
--
--
sp*********@rrohio.com
(Remove 999 to reply to me)