I am designing a WEB BASED Accounting Software with ASP and SQL
Server. For this I need some help for the Database design. My design
is as follows.
I)User table: User_id, UserName.....
Users (e.g. John Smith) Each User would contain a following Group of
tables
a)Customers
b)Suppliers
c)Bank Accounts
d)Transactions
Tables under :
User_FinYear_Customers (e.g JohnSmith_02_03_Customers)
User_FinYear_Suppliers (e.g JohnSmith_02_03_Suppliers)
User_FinYear_BankAccounts (e.g JohnSmith_02_03_BankAccounts)
User_FinYear_Transactions (e.g JohnSmith_02_03_Transactions)
As new user is created all the above tables are created at run time.
These tables are created for each and every user. There can be more
than 4 tables (as mentioned above) for one user. These tables will
increase as more users are added. Only thing in support of this design
is that, the record fetching time for a particular user would be
minimum and the table for a particular user will only load in Memory.
IS IT FEASIBLE TO CREATE ABOUT 20 TABLES FOR EACH NEW USER ADDED TO
THE DATABASE? WHICH MEANS IF THERE ARE 1000 USERS THERE WOULD BE 20000
TABLES IN THE DATABASE. THIS CASE CAN GO WORSE IF THERE ARE MORE THAN
1000 USERS. WHAT IS BETTER DATABASE DESIGN, MORE TABLES WITH LESS
RECORDS OR LESS TABLES WITH MORE NO.OF RECORDS?
An alternative design can be as follows
Tables:
Users, Customers, Suppliers, BankAccounts, Transactions .....and so
on.
User: User_Id, UserName, ......
Customers: User_Id, Customer_Id,......
Suppliers: User_Id, Supplier_Id,.....
BankAccounts: User_Id, BankAc_Id,.....
Transactions: User_Id, Trans_Id......
..
..
..
..
All these tables would be created at the design time only and as a new
user is created a record is added to the users table. When the user
adds Customer the record is added to the Customers table... and so
on.... The problem with this design is that Customers,Suppliers,
BankAccounts.... etc tables would contain records for all the users
and thus the record fetching time for a particular user increases as
many times as there are users in the Database. Another problems with
this design is that more than one user would be connected at run time
will access the same tables, and for even a single user the complete
table will be loaded in memory.
WHICH DESIGN SHOULD BE USED AS FAR AS SPEED OF SERVER IS CONCERNED?
PLEASE HELP WITH CONVINCING REASONS. 3 4469
Clearly #2, less maint and if you ever need over all queries or a customer
gets combined it should be a lot easier. Also use Oracle not the other one
since this is an Oracle newsgroup.
Jim
"Rushikesh" <rb*****@sify.com> wrote in message
news:2b**************************@posting.google.c om... I am designing a WEB BASED Accounting Software with ASP and SQL Server. For this I need some help for the Database design. My design is as follows.
I)User table: User_id, UserName..... Users (e.g. John Smith) Each User would contain a following Group of tables
a)Customers b)Suppliers c)Bank Accounts d)Transactions
Tables under : User_FinYear_Customers (e.g JohnSmith_02_03_Customers) User_FinYear_Suppliers (e.g JohnSmith_02_03_Suppliers) User_FinYear_BankAccounts (e.g JohnSmith_02_03_BankAccounts) User_FinYear_Transactions (e.g JohnSmith_02_03_Transactions)
As new user is created all the above tables are created at run time. These tables are created for each and every user. There can be more than 4 tables (as mentioned above) for one user. These tables will increase as more users are added. Only thing in support of this design is that, the record fetching time for a particular user would be minimum and the table for a particular user will only load in Memory.
IS IT FEASIBLE TO CREATE ABOUT 20 TABLES FOR EACH NEW USER ADDED TO THE DATABASE? WHICH MEANS IF THERE ARE 1000 USERS THERE WOULD BE 20000 TABLES IN THE DATABASE. THIS CASE CAN GO WORSE IF THERE ARE MORE THAN 1000 USERS. WHAT IS BETTER DATABASE DESIGN, MORE TABLES WITH LESS RECORDS OR LESS TABLES WITH MORE NO.OF RECORDS?
An alternative design can be as follows
Tables: Users, Customers, Suppliers, BankAccounts, Transactions .....and so on.
User: User_Id, UserName, ...... Customers: User_Id, Customer_Id,...... Suppliers: User_Id, Supplier_Id,..... BankAccounts: User_Id, BankAc_Id,..... Transactions: User_Id, Trans_Id...... . . . .
All these tables would be created at the design time only and as a new user is created a record is added to the users table. When the user adds Customer the record is added to the Customers table... and so on.... The problem with this design is that Customers,Suppliers, BankAccounts.... etc tables would contain records for all the users and thus the record fetching time for a particular user increases as many times as there are users in the Database. Another problems with this design is that more than one user would be connected at run time will access the same tables, and for even a single user the complete table will be loaded in memory.
WHICH DESIGN SHOULD BE USED AS FAR AS SPEED OF SERVER IS CONCERNED? PLEASE HELP WITH CONVINCING REASONS.
"Rushikesh" <rb*****@sify.com> wrote in message
news:2b**************************@posting.google.c om... I am designing a WEB BASED Accounting Software with ASP and SQL Server. For this I need some help for the Database design. My design is as follows.
You may need a lot more than just these tables.
and thus the record fetching time for a particular user increases as many times as there are users in the Database.
Oh no, it doesn't!
will access the same tables, and for even a single user the complete table will be loaded in memory.
It is ridiculous if you write your code to do that. WHICH DESIGN SHOULD BE USED AS FAR AS SPEED OF SERVER IS CONCERNED? PLEASE HELP WITH CONVINCING REASONS.
Second.
Read a few texts about database design and normalization.
--
Cheers
Nuno Souto wi*******@yahoo.com.au.nospam
Rushikesh (rb*****@sify.com) writes: I am designing a WEB BASED Accounting Software with ASP and SQL Server. For this I need some help for the Database design. My design is as follows.
As whether you should use SQL Server or Oracle, I don't have an opinion.
I come from the SQL Server side, but these questions have the same answer
for any enterprise DBMS.
I)User table: User_id, UserName..... Users (e.g. John Smith) Each User would contain a following Group of tables
a)Customers b)Suppliers c)Bank Accounts d)Transactions
This is a completely unacceptable solution, and in completely violation
of the relational model. Just forget about it.
All these tables would be created at the design time only and as a new user is created a record is added to the users table. When the user adds Customer the record is added to the Customers table... and so on.... The problem with this design is that Customers,Suppliers, BankAccounts.... etc tables would contain records for all the users and thus the record fetching time for a particular user increases as many times as there are users in the Database. Another problems with this design is that more than one user would be connected at run time will access the same tables, and for even a single user the complete table will be loaded in memory.
Your assumptions here are entirely correct. Or to be less polite: they
are flat wrong in places.
An enterprise DBMS are built for implementing this kind of solution.
With proper indexes, the difference in access time to a certain row
if you have 100 rows or million rows in the table is neglible. Or if
you for that matter have 100 million rows.
Neither does an enterprise DBMS load an entire table into memory, because
there is an access to a single row. I cannot speak for Oracle, but SQL
Server will read the pages you access into memory, and if one user is
very active, all his pages may be in cache, whereas the pages for a user
who is on vacation are only on disk. Pages per users? Ah, didn't I mention
indexes? It does seem reasonable from you mentioned to have clustered
indexes on user ids.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, so****@algonet.se
Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinf...2000/books.asp This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Don Vaillancourt |
last post by:
Hello all,
Over the years as I design more database schemas the more I come up with
patterns in database design. The more patterns I recognize the more I
want to try to design some kind of...
|
by: Lane Beneke |
last post by:
All,
New to the list and a relative newbie to PostgreSQL. Please forgive stupid
questions.
Designing an application server for a work order processing (et al)
database. I have a good handle...
|
by: trynittee |
last post by:
Hello,
It's been a while since I've posted. I am an intermediate user of
Access. I can read simple VB code, have done complex queries,
comfortable with event procedures, designing forms and...
|
by: nyathancha |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a question regarding best practices in database design. In a
relational database, is it wise/necessary to sometimes create tables
that are not related to other tables through a...
|
by: vicky |
last post by:
Hi All,
Can u please suggest me some books for relational database design or
database modelling(Knowledgeable yet simple) i.e. from which we could
learn database relationships(one to many,many to...
|
by: Laurynn |
last post by:
# (ebook - pdf) - programming - mysql - php database applicati
# (Ebook - Pdf)Learnkey How To Design A Database - Sql And Crystal
Report
# (ebook-pdf) E F Codd - Extending the Database Relational...
|
by: abhijitbkulkarni |
last post by:
Hello,
I am designing a .NET database application that uses 3 tier architecture. Starting initially, this application will be desktop application but I will convert it into a website later but...
|
by: sam |
last post by:
Hi,
Hope you are doing well !!!!
One of our clients is looking to augment their team with “Database
Architect – DB2" please find below the details and respond with
|
by: programmerx101 |
last post by:
Ok, I'm looking for expert advice on this one.
I have a database which keeps going into read_only mode. Sometimes it goes into read_only / single user mode. Once it was taken offline completely....
|
by: taylorcarr |
last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: aa123db |
last post by:
Variable and constants
Use var or let for variables and const fror constants.
Var foo ='bar';
Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar';
Functions
function $name$ ($parameters$) {
}
...
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
| |