On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:35:10 +0000 (UTC), "David Penney"
<an**@noone.com> wrote:
Sudhesh,
my company has a product, MetaMatrix, that will link the two in exactly the
manner you require. It will also combine the Oracle & MS SQLServer schemas &
as a unified virtual database make them both together look like an instance
of your MSSQLServer database - then you can get all data together.
Regards
David Penney
http://www.metamatrix.com
"Sudhesh Nayak" <Su*****@mail.com> wrote in message
news:8d**************************@posting.google. com... Hi,
I have an Oracle (8.1) & a SQL Server 2000 database with
Production data. There are situations when I need data from both the
databases. My first choice was to link Oracle to SQL and run DTS
overnight. But this would have a 1 day latency not to mention the time
it would take.
1. Has any one tried real time access via Linked server to Oracle?
How good is the performance?
2. The Oracle db is fairly big, so I'm kinda not in favor of
copying the whole thing over into SQL overnight. Is there an easier
way to just get only the changed records from Oracle?
3. Is there a better solution to this?
4. Lastly, if I use OPENROWSET or OPENQUERY, can I dynamically
change the SQL that you pass it? e.g. can the query accept a
parameter?
Thanks in advance
Sudhesh
I'm doings this. The main problem I had was wanting to relate data in
Oracle to that in SQL Server. It was horribly slow and we established
that what was happening was that MSSQL was going to pull the whole
table over from Oracle and then execute the query.
I solved using openquery. I created tables in SQLServer to hold what I
wanted from Oracle, populate using openquery and then deleted it.
Openquery performance is fine. You can use parameters, but you do it
by building up a string, containing the openquery statement and the
actual query and then you exec the string. This involves a nice game
of getting the right number of quotes!
A couple of other gotchas;
The oracle table names and columns have to be in capitals.
The oledb driver doesn't like columns defined as number, it wants them
to be NUMBER(12,0) or whatever. (The error is that the schema has
changed between parse and execution, or words to that effect).
Depending on your exact setup you may not find these problems, but we
did.
If you want a sample post a reply, as I'm not at work right now.