sk**@pobox.com wrote:
In fact my system successfully filtered out the original spam so that>I'm pretty sure all of the spam is automated, so your message won't
>get through to anyone.
D'ArcyWell, it got through to us adding to our spam problem.
Right. I apologize that so much spam seems to be leaking through still. I
was not my problem.
am working on the problem. I'm pretty sure at this point that I am seeingI am sure that we all appreciate your efforts. That doesn't mean that
all the spam (even those messages which gmail thoughtfully traps for me) and
have modified things slightly so that I can dig into the reasons why some
spams are missed and some pretty obvious hams are held.
we should depend on you to block 100% of the spam. We need to take
some responsibility on our own systems too.
So, best approach now when you see a spam message is: try to rein in yourWell, yes, that was my point. I had managed to filter out the spam but
sarcastic wit and just hit the 'd' key.
then had to deal with someone responding here to a spam that I never
saw. The sarcasm was directed at the person who replied to the spam
rather than hitting the 'd' key.
This conversation sounds like we are in "violent agreement." :-)
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <da***@druid.net | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.