472,119 Members | 1,588 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post +

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 472,119 software developers and data experts.

Re: The recent SPAM messages, and a suggested solution

RonI think most of us are annoyed by the recent SPAM messages that
Roncrept onto our list. I'd like to suggest a possible solution, and
Ronmaybe start a thread that eventually will rid us of this

RonMy idea:

RonOnce every few messages from the list owners, they would send a new
Ronnumerical string that will have to be included in members' list
Ronsubmission. A message being submitted without this numeric string
Ronwill be re-routed to /dev/null. The current string will be
Ronannounced on the messages being send to new members upon

RonSince SPAM is sent in bulk, this may be a rather complete solution.

Those of us who manage the the python.org mailing lists are overloaded
enough as it is. We don't have time to add extra tasks to our daily
checklists. In addition, ad hoc solutions frequently don't scale well.
Check http://mail.python.org/ for the full scope of the management problem.
We run a single SpamBayes instance on mail.python.org which scans for spam
in almost all those mailing lists. A couple are unfiltered for various

If you read python-list via Usenet (comp.lang.python in its various guises)
there's not much we can do to help you. If someone posts crap via Usenet
you will see it before it reaches the spam filter on mail.python.org. Some
Usenet servers may provide decent spam filtering. Google Groups appears not
to, and their spam reporting process requires several steps on your part.
If you are reading py*********@python.org please feel free to mail me
(sk**@pobox.com) any spam which sneaks through SpamBayes. I will train them
as I can, generally about once a day. It would really help if you could
attach a zip'd or gzip'd copy of the message. Don't just paste a spam
message into any mail you send me.

If you read email you get spam. That is an unfortunate fact of life today.
You should run some sort of spam filter on your system and not rely on
sysadmins or mailing list admins to filter your mail. My email goes through
Gmail and I run SpamBayes on my laptop as well. That presents its own set
of issues (I have to poke around in both filters' traps to find spams which
sneak through the mail.python.org filters for example), but I generally see
very little spam. You can get SpamBayes (it's free and written in Python)
from <http://www.spambayes.org/>. There are a number of ways to use it,
including an Outlook plugin and several more Unix-oriented apps. All use
the same core classifier. There is a Thunderbird plugin available (google
for ThunderBayes) which is currently unsupported but which we would like to
incorporate into the SpamBayes code base. Unfortunately, we are short of
round tuits. If you'd like to help we can always use more brainpower.

Skip Montanaro - sk**@pobox.com - http://www.webfast.com/~skip/
Oct 6 '08 #1
0 1058

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

17 posts views Thread by Steve Jorgensen | last post: by
2 posts views Thread by Brian Vanderburg II | last post: by
13 posts views Thread by lyle fairfield | last post: by
1 post views Thread by Barak, Ron | last post: by
2 posts views Thread by Shawn Milochik | last post: by
reply views Thread by leo001 | last post: by

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.