Making code more efficient and effective

[cokofreedom]

I've written up a little piece of code that isn't that foolproof to
scan through a file (java presently) to find functions and then look
for them throughout the document and output the name of the function,
followed by how many times it appears and the lines it appears on.

What I was looking for was ways to improve, simplfy and beautify the
code. More to aid my learning of Python than produce a perfect way to
scan for this (netbeans was annoying me...which is why I did this)

Anyway, the source code:

from __future__ import with_statement

functions = dict()
func_words = ("private", "public", "protected")
ignore_class = " class "

def get_func_name(line):
for word in func_words:
if word in line: break
else: return None
# set it to ignore the func_word and the space after
line = line[len(word) + 1:]
index = line.find("(")
if index != -1:
func_name = ""
for letter in reversed(line[:index]):
if letter == " ": break
func_name += letter
return ''.join(reversed(func_name))
else: return None

with open(r"C:\example.java", "r") as test_file:
for number, line in enumerate(test_file):
line = line.strip()
if line.startswith(func_words) and line.find(ignore_class ) ==
-1:
func_name = get_func_name(line);
if func_name is not None:
functions.setdefault(func_name, []).append(number)

test_file.seek(0)
for number, line in enumerate(test_file):
for key in functions.iterkeys():
if line.find(key) != -1:
functions[key].append(number)

print "\n".join("Function: %s, found on %d line(s); these being
%s"
% (k, len(v), v) for k, v in
functions.iteritems())

[=?iso-8859-1?q?C=E9dric_Lucantis?=]

Le Thursday 26 June 2008 14:11:35 co*********@gmail.com, vous avez écrit*:

I've written up a little piece of code that isn't that foolproof to
scan through a file (java presently) to find functions and then look
for them throughout the document and output the name of the function,
followed by how many times it appears and the lines it appears on.

What I was looking for was ways to improve, simplfy and beautify the
code. More to aid my learning of Python than produce a perfect way to
scan for this (netbeans was annoying me...which is why I did this)

Anyway, the source code:

I would use some regexp instead (assuming that the function prototype is ona
single line and that the return type of the function is a single identifier,
I don't remember if it's always the case in Java)

PAT = re.compile('^[ ]*(public|protected|private)[ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)
[ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)[ ]+\((.*)\).*$')

for line in source_file :
if PAT.match(line) :
func_vis = PAT.sub(r'\1', line)
func_type = PAT.sub(r'\2', line)
func_name = PAT.sub(r'\3', line)
func_args = PAT.sub(r'\4', line)
print "'%s' -'%s' '%s' '%s' '%s'" % (line, func_vis, func_type,
func_name, func_args)

It might be hard to read but will avoid a lot of obscure parsing code. I can't
tell if it makes the code more efficient but you don't care about that unless
you're parsing several million lines of code.

--
Cédric Lucantis

[bearophileHUGS]

Cédric Lucantis:

PAT = re.compile('^[ ]*(public|protected|private)[ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)
[ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)[ ]+\((.*)\).*$')
...
It might be hard to read but will avoid a lot of obscure parsing code.

You can use the VERBOSE mode, to add comments and split that RE into
some lines.

I think the RE module of Python 3.0 can be modified in some way to
encourage people to write more readable REs, but I don't know how.
Maybe the VERBOSE can be on by default...

Bye,
bearophile

[cokofreedom]

On Jun 26, 5:42 pm, [e-mail] wrote:

Cédric Lucantis:

PAT = re.compile('^[ ]*(public|protected|private)[ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)
[ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)[ ]+\((.*)\).*$')
...
It might be hard to read but will avoid a lot of obscure parsing code.

You can use the VERBOSE mode, to add comments and split that RE into
some lines.

I think the RE module of Python 3.0 can be modified in some way to
encourage people to write more readable REs, but I don't know how.
Maybe the VERBOSE can be on by default...

Bye,
bearophile

Thank you to everyone that replied in the thread and privately, been
looking into the different techniques. Presently found the RE to be
readable once I put it into VERBOSE format. I had looked it at earlier
but struck a dead wall, till Cédric gave such clear code!

I've been doing Java code the last few weeks and it is hard to jump
between them sometimes, Java has to be so organised and checked over
and over, I forget Python doesn't need such defensive programming.

I currently have it finding functions, constructors and classes, and
looking for them within the code, which is exactly what I was hoping
for! It also reads a lot clearer, which was what I was aiming for. So
thanks to everyone that helped!