IDE on the level of Eclipse or DEVc++?

[cirfu]

is there an IDE for python of the same quality as Eclipse or DEVC++?

I am currently using the editor that coems iwth python and it is all
fine but for bigger projects it would be nice to have some way to
easier browse the projectfiles for example.

[Andrii V. Mishkovskyi]

2008/6/23 cirfu <ci**********@yahoo.se>:

is there an IDE for python of the same quality as Eclipse or DEVC++?

I am currently using the editor that coems iwth python and it is all
fine but for bigger projects it would be nice to have some way to
easier browse the projectfiles for example.

Actually, there is a great plugin for Eclipse, called PyDev. You
should check it out. :)

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

--
Wbr, Andrii Mishkovskyi.

He's got a heart of a little child, and he keeps it in a jar on his desk.

[Tim Arnold]

"cirfu" <ci**********@yahoo.sewrote in message
news:56**********************************@t54g2000 hsg.googlegroups.com...

is there an IDE for python of the same quality as Eclipse or DEVC++?

I am currently using the editor that coems iwth python and it is all
fine but for bigger projects it would be nice to have some way to
easier browse the projectfiles for example.

why not eclipse itself, using the pydev plugin?
--Tim

[cirfu]

i downloaded the extension for eclipse, nice.

any opinions of netbeans vs eclipse for python?

[Colin J. Williams]

cirfu wrote:

is there an IDE for python of the same quality as Eclipse or DEVC++?

I am currently using the editor that coems iwth python and it is all
fine but for bigger projects it would be nice to have some way to
easier browse the projectfiles for example.

I don't know these but you might look at
PyScripter.

Colin W.

[Tim Cook]

I highly recommend Wing http://www.wingware.com . There are various
licensing levels and even one for open source only developers. The
support is AWESOME!.

--Tim
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 09:15 -0700, cirfu wrote:

is there an IDE for python of the same quality as Eclipse or DEVC++?

I am currently using the editor that coems iwth python and it is all
fine but for bigger projects it would be nice to have some way to
easier browse the projectfiles for example.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

--
Timothy Cook, MSc
Health Informatics Research & Development Services
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
Skype ID == timothy.cook
************************************************** ************
*You may get my Public GPG key from popular keyservers or *
*from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home*
************************************************** ************

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIYDJr2TFRV0OoZwMRAo+uAKCrLUuFWVSB+mwAsu8L7I rcNhXiXQCgwQG5
4MyfvM6f7EJ51WSjYGDFyeg=
=DwLc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[lotrpy]

On 6ÔÂ24ÈÕ, ÉÏÎç7ʱ31·Ö, Tim Cook <[e-mail]:

signature.asc
1KÏÂÔØ

I highly recommend Winghttp://www.wingware.com. There are various
licensing levels and even one for open source only developers. The
support is AWESOME!.

--Tim

+1 for WingIDE, My favorite Python IDE. Code Intelligence, Multi-
threaded debugging ......

[Rich Healey]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

cirfu wrote:

is there an IDE for python of the same quality as Eclipse or DEVC++?

I am currently using the editor that coems iwth python and it is all
fine but for bigger projects it would be nice to have some way to
easier browse the projectfiles for example.

I don't want to start a flamewar.

But I like vim.

- --
Rich Healey - he*********@gmail.com
Developer / Systems Admin - OpenPGP: 0x8C8147807
MSN: bi**********@hotmail.com AIM: richohealey33
irc.psych0tik.net -#hbh #admins richohealey
irc.freenode.org -#hbh #debian PythonNinja
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIYElBLeTfO4yBSAcRAvjqAJ9DIbb5qxLTh+s2k0AsUk mxoC0TtACdFj3x
hxVamWJkbDsslu8F+QhG2xA=
=G4vQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[David]

Rich Healey wrote:

>
I don't want to start a flamewar.

But I like vim.

Hi Rich, could I take a look at your .vimrc , the python stuff.
thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

--
Powered by Gentoo GNU/LINUX
http://www.linuxcrazy.com

[Rich Healey]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David wrote:

Rich Healey wrote:

>>
I don't want to start a flamewar.

But I like vim.

Hi Rich, could I take a look at your .vimrc , the python stuff.
thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

hi

my .vimrc is quite simple
syntax on
set ai
"set nu
autocmd BufRead *.py set smartindent
cinwords=if,elif,else,for,while,try,except,finally ,def,class
set ts=4
set et
set sw=4
- --
Rich Healey - he*********@gmail.com
Developer / Systems Admin - OpenPGP: 0x8C8147807
MSN: bi**********@hotmail.com AIM: richohealey33
irc.psych0tik.net -#hbh #admins richohealey
irc.freenode.org -#hbh #debian PythonNinja
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIYGGYLeTfO4yBSAcRAl4UAJ9osVZgMfQiClj0Jfs1fV BxNsx1MwCgkhW6
F4Kl5t1LVxJxGg+4ULiVMYE=
=VqgT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Aspersieman]

David wrote:

Rich Healey wrote:

>>
I don't want to start a flamewar.

But I like vim.

Hi Rich, could I take a look at your .vimrc , the python stuff.
thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Try this :
http://blog.sontek.net/2008/05/11/py...dular-ide-vim/

Nicol

--

The three things to remember about Llamas:
1) They are harmless
2) They are deadly
3) They are made of lava, and thus nice to cuddle.

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

cirfu a écrit :

is there an IDE for python of the same quality as Eclipse or DEVC++?

I am currently using the editor that coems iwth python and it is all
fine but for bigger projects it would be nice to have some way to
easier browse the projectfiles for example.

If you're into clickodroms, you may want to have a look at Eric too. As
far as i'm concerned, I still wait for something that would be worth
dropping emacs + python-mode + ecb.

[Ben Finney]

Bruno Desthuilliers <br********************@websiteburo.invalidwrite s:

If you're into clickodroms, you may want to have a look at Eric too.
As far as i'm concerned, I still wait for something that would be
worth dropping emacs + python-mode + ecb.

I'm having the most success with this combination, yes. Though ecb is
rather non-Emacs-like in its configuration, and seems to strongly
expect to be run in graphical mode, it is still very powerful.

If it weren't for that, I'd be looking seriously at PIDA
<URL:http://pida.co.uk/which assembles many standard tools into a
consistent graphical Python IDE.

--
\ "Laugh and the world laughs with you; snore and you sleep |
`\ alone." —anonymous |
_o__) |
Ben Finney

[Jorge Godoy]

Ben Finney wrote:

Bruno Desthuilliers <br********************@websiteburo.invalidwrite s:

>If you're into clickodroms, you may want to have a look at Eric too.
As far as i'm concerned, I still wait for something that would be
worth dropping emacs + python-mode + ecb.

I'm having the most success with this combination, yes. Though ecb is
rather non-Emacs-like in its configuration, and seems to strongly
expect to be run in graphical mode, it is still very powerful.

Heh... I'm another one that keeps trying new things but comes back to Emacs all the time.

Eclipse is too heavy, NetBeans has a poor support, Eric is too "mousy"...

--
Jorge Godoy <jg****@gmail.com>

[cokofreedom]

On Jun 25, 12:38 pm, Jorge Godoy <[e-mail]:

Ben Finney wrote:

Bruno Desthuilliers <[e-mail] s:

If you're into clickodroms, you may want to have a look at Eric too.
As far as i'm concerned, I still wait for something that would be
worth dropping emacs + python-mode + ecb.

I'm having the most success with this combination, yes. Though ecb is
rather non-Emacs-like in its configuration, and seems to strongly
expect to be run in graphical mode, it is still very powerful.

Heh... I'm another one that keeps trying new things but comes back to Emacs all the time.

Eclipse is too heavy, NetBeans has a poor support, Eric is too "mousy"...

--
Jorge Godoy <[e-mail]>

How is emacs on a windows platform?

[Jorge Godoy]

co*********@gmail.com wrote:

How is emacs on a windows platform?

Except for Windows using _emacs instead of .emacs, it was the same I had on Linux, last time I tried it... :-)

There are packages for Windows that have a lot of things pre-packaged to make it feel more like a Windows application, including keyboard shortcuts.

--
Jorge Godoy <jg****@gmail.com>

[Richard G Riley]

Jorge Godoy <jg****@gmail.comwrites:

co*********@gmail.com wrote:

>How is emacs on a windows platform?

Except for Windows using _emacs instead of .emacs, it was the same I had on Linux, last time I tried it... :-)

There are packages for Windows that have a lot of things pre-packaged
to make it feel more like a Windows application, including keyboard
shortcuts.

More specifically : cua-mode

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

co*********@gmail.com a écrit :

On Jun 25, 12:38 pm, Jorge Godoy <[e-mail]:

>Ben Finney wrote:

>>Bruno Desthuilliers <[e-mail] s:
If you're into clickodroms, you may want to have a look at Eric too.
As far as i'm concerned, I still wait for something that would be
worth dropping emacs + python-mode + ecb.
I'm having the most success with this combination, yes. Though ecb is
rather non-Emacs-like in its configuration, and seems to strongly
expect to be run in graphical mode, it is still very powerful.

Heh... I'm another one that keeps trying new things but comes back to Emacs all the time.

Eclipse is too heavy, NetBeans has a poor support, Eric is too "mousy"...

--
Jorge Godoy <[e-mail]>

How is emacs on a windows platform?

err... alien ?-)