Is 2006 too old for a book on Python?

[jmDesktop]

Hi, I wanted to buy a book on Python, but am concerned that some of
them are too old. One I had come to after much research was Core
Python by Wesley Chun. I looked at many others, but actually saw this
one in the store and liked it. However, it is from 2006. I know
there is free documentation and Dive Into Python. I just liked the
one in question and was hoping for thoughts on the age of it. I am
using Python 2.5.x and don' t know how different 2.3, 2,4 is from it.

Thank you.

[Steve Holden]

jmDesktop wrote:

Hi, I wanted to buy a book on Python, but am concerned that some of
them are too old. One I had come to after much research was Core
Python by Wesley Chun. I looked at many others, but actually saw this
one in the store and liked it. However, it is from 2006. I know
there is free documentation and Dive Into Python. I just liked the
one in question and was hoping for thoughts on the age of it. I am
using Python 2.5.x and don' t know how different 2.3, 2,4 is from it.

Buy it if you like it (and lots of people do). Less than 1% of the
language changes between releases. You'll pick the rest up here!

regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden [phone] [phone]
Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/

[Matt Nordhoff]

jmDesktop wrote:

Hi, I wanted to buy a book on Python, but am concerned that some of
them are too old. One I had come to after much research was Core
Python by Wesley Chun. I looked at many others, but actually saw this
one in the store and liked it. However, it is from 2006. I know
there is free documentation and Dive Into Python. I just liked the
one in question and was hoping for thoughts on the age of it. I am
using Python 2.5.x and don' t know how different 2.3, 2,4 is from it.

Thank you.

Python 2.x releases maintain backwards compatibility. There are nice
features that have come since 2.3, but it's not like it's a different
language. You could learn from a slightly old book, then do some
research to find out what you missed. ('with' statement, ternary
operator, smaller things in the stdlib. Maybe generators? What else?)

Now, Python 3 will break backwards compatibility and make more
significant changes than usual, but it will still be basically the same
language, so the same thing applies. And anyway, it won't be very
relevant for a few years.
--

[Scott David Daniels]

jmDesktop wrote:

Hi, I wanted to buy a book on Python, but am concerned that some of
them are too old. One I had come to after much research was Core
Python by Wesley Chun. I looked at many others, but actually saw this
one in the store and liked it. However, it is from 2006. I know
there is free documentation and Dive Into Python. I just liked the
one in question and was hoping for thoughts on the age of it. I am
using Python 2.5.x and don' t know how different 2.3, 2,4 is from it.

Look at http://rgruet.free.fr/
If you look at the 2.5 quick reference, several previous versions are
included, with the differences color-coded. You can reassure yourself
that the vast majority of the language remains the same.
--Scott David Daniels
Sc***********@Acm.Org

[Dan Bishop]

On Apr 25, 8:16 am, jmDesktop <[e-mail]:

Hi, I wanted to buy a book on Python, but am concerned that some of
them are too old. One I had come to after much research was Core
Python by Wesley Chun. I looked at many others, but actually saw this
one in the store and liked it. However, it is from 2006. I know
there is free documentation and Dive Into Python. I just liked the
one in question and was hoping for thoughts on the age of it. I am
using Python 2.5.x and don' t know how different 2.3, 2,4 is from it.

The changes are relatively minor. And having learned Python 2.3, you
can simply refer to:

What's New in Python 2.4:
http://www.python.org/doc/2.4.3/what...hatsnew24.html

What's New in Python 2.5:
http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/whatsnew25.html