Code block function syntax, anonymous functions decorator

[castironpi]

def run3( block ):
for _ in range( 3 ):
block()

run3():
normal_suite()

Introduces new syntax; arbitrary functions can follow 'colon'.

Maintains readability, meaning is consistent.

Equivalent to:

def run3( block ):
for _ in range( 3 ):
block()

@run3
def anonfunc():
normal_suite()

Simplification in cases in which decorators are use often.

[Diez B. Roggisch]

ca********@gmail.com schrieb:

def run3( block ):
for _ in range( 3 ):
block()

run3():
normal_suite()

Introduces new syntax; arbitrary functions can follow 'colon'.

Maintains readability, meaning is consistent.

Equivalent to:

def run3( block ):
for _ in range( 3 ):
block()

@run3
def anonfunc():
normal_suite()

Simplification in cases in which decorators are use often.

This is non-sensical - how do you invoke anonfunc? They would all bind
to the same name, run3. Or to no name as all, as your "spec" lacks that.

Besides, it's butt-ugly IMHO. But taste comes after proper definition...

Diez

[castironpi]

On Feb 6, 4:59*pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[e-mail]:

[e-mail] schrieb:

def run3( block ):
* *for _ in range( 3 ):
* * * block()

run3():
* *normal_suite()

Introduces new syntax; arbitrary functions can follow 'colon'.

Maintains readability, meaning is consistent.

Equivalent to:

def run3( block ):
* *for _ in range( 3 ):
* * * block()

@run3
def anonfunc():
* *normal_suite()

Simplification in cases in which decorators are use often.

This is non-sensical - how do you invoke anonfunc? They would all bind
to the same name, run3. Or to no name as all, as your "spec" lacks that.

Besides, it's butt-ugly IMHO. But taste comes after proper definition...

Diez- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fallacy here is that @run3 as described is not a typical
decorator, such one that returns a function. It is called at
"definition"-time, that is, when the function definition is executed,
and executes the code.