473,288 Members | 1,745 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,288 software developers and data experts.

Appending a list's elements to another list using a list comprehension

I have two lists:

a = [1, 2, 3]
b = [4, 5, 6]

What I'd like to do is append all of the elements of b at the end of
a, so that a looks like:

a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

I can do this using

map(a.append, b)

How do I do this using a list comprehension?

(In general, is using a list comprehension preferable (or more
"pythonic") as opposed to using map / filter etc.?)

Oct 17 '07 #1
10 14975
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:27:14 +0000, Debajit Adhikary wrote:
I have two lists:

a = [1, 2, 3]
b = [4, 5, 6]

What I'd like to do is append all of the elements of b at the end of
a, so that a looks like:

a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

I can do this using

map(a.append, b)
This is a bad idea as it creates a useless list of `None`\s, one for each
element in `b`.
How do I do this using a list comprehension?
Not at all. The obvious solution here is ``a.extend(b)``.
(In general, is using a list comprehension preferable (or more
"pythonic") as opposed to using map / filter etc.?)
Some say yes.

Ciao,
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
Oct 17 '07 #2
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 20:27 +0000, Debajit Adhikary wrote:
I have two lists:

a = [1, 2, 3]
b = [4, 5, 6]

What I'd like to do is append all of the elements of b at the end of
a, so that a looks like:

a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

I can do this using

map(a.append, b)

How do I do this using a list comprehension?
You don't.
(In general, is using a list comprehension preferable (or more
"pythonic") as opposed to using map / filter etc.?)
In general, a list comprehension is more Pythonic nowadays, but in your
particular case the answer is neither map nor a list comprehension, it's
this:

a += b

HTH,

--
Carsten Haese
http://informixdb.sourceforge.net
Oct 17 '07 #3
On Oct 17, 9:27 pm, Debajit Adhikary <debaj...@gmail.comwrote:
I have two lists:

a = [1, 2, 3]
b = [4, 5, 6]

What I'd like to do is append all of the elements of b at the end of
a, so that a looks like:

a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

I can do this using

map(a.append, b)

How do I do this using a list comprehension?

(In general, is using a list comprehension preferable (or more
"pythonic") as opposed to using map / filter etc.?)
Yes, using a list comprehension is usually more pythonic than using
map/filter. But here, the right answer is:
a.extend(b). The first thing you should always do is check the python
libraries for a function or method that does what you want. Even if
you think you know the library quite well it's still worth checking:
I've lost count of the number of times I've discovered a library
function that does exactly what I wanted.

Anyway, if extend didn't exist, the pythonic version of map(a.append,
b) would be
for x in b:
a.append(x)

Rather than
[a.append(x) for x in b]
List comprehensions and map produce a new list. That's not what you
want here: you're using the side-effect of the append method - which
modifies a. This makes using regular iteration the right idea, because
by using map or a comprehension, you're also constructing a list of
the return values of append (which is always None). You can see this
in the interpreter:
>>map(a.append, b)
[None, None, None]
>>a
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

HTH

--
Paul Hankin

Oct 17 '07 #4
On Oct 17, 10:03 pm, Debajit Adhikary <debaj...@gmail.comwrote:
How does "a.extend(b)" compare with "a += b" when it comes to
performance? Does a + b create a completely new list that it assigns
back to a? If so, a.extend(b) would seem to be faster. How could I
verify things like these?
Use a += b rather than a.extend(b): I'm not sure what I was thinking.
Anyway, look at 'timeit' to see how to measure things like this, but
my advice would be not to worry and to write the most readable code -
and only optimise if your code's runnign too slowly.

To answer your question though: a += b is *not* the same as a = a + b.
The latter would create a new list and assign it to a, whereas a += b
updates a in-place.

--
Paul Hankin

Oct 17 '07 #5
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:40:40 +0000, Paul Hankin wrote:
On Oct 17, 10:03 pm, Debajit Adhikary <debaj...@gmail.comwrote:
>How does "a.extend(b)" compare with "a += b" when it comes to
performance? Does a + b create a completely new list that it assigns
back to a? If so, a.extend(b) would seem to be faster. How could I
verify things like these?

Use a += b rather than a.extend(b): I'm not sure what I was thinking.
Neither am I. Why do you say that?

Anyway, look at 'timeit' to see how to measure things like this, but my
advice would be not to worry and to write the most readable code - and
only optimise if your code's runnign too slowly.
Always good advice, but of course what a person considers "the most
readable code" changes with their experience.

To answer your question though: a += b is *not* the same as a = a + b.

It might be. It depends on what a and b are.

--
Steven
Oct 18 '07 #6
Paul Hankin <pa*********@gmail.comwrites:
On Oct 17, 10:03 pm, Debajit Adhikary <debaj...@gmail.comwrote:
>How does "a.extend(b)" compare with "a += b" when it comes to
performance? Does a + b create a completely new list that it assigns
back to a? If so, a.extend(b) would seem to be faster. How could I
verify things like these?

Use a += b rather than a.extend(b): I'm not sure what I was
thinking.
Why? a.extend(b) is at least as readable, and is guaranteed to extend
the same list. In general, "a += b" can fall back to the slower "a =
a + b" for sequences that don't support +=.
Oct 18 '07 #7
On Oct 18, 10:21 am, Hrvoje Niksic <hnik...@xemacs.orgwrote:
Paul Hankin <paul.han...@gmail.comwrites:
On Oct 17, 10:03 pm, Debajit Adhikary <debaj...@gmail.comwrote:
How does "a.extend(b)" compare with "a += b" when it comes to
performance? Does a + b create a completely new list that it assigns
back to a? If so, a.extend(b) would seem to be faster. How could I
verify things like these?
Use a += b rather than a.extend(b): I'm not sure what I was
thinking.

Why? a.extend(b) is at least as readable, and is guaranteed to extend
the same list. In general, "a += b" can fall back to the slower "a =
a + b" for sequences that don't support +=.
Not to me: I can never remember which of a.append and a.extend is
which. Falling back to a = a + b is exactly what you want. For
instance:

a = (1, 2, 3)
a += (4, 5, 6)

works, whereas:

a = (1, 2, 3)
a.extend((4, 5, 6))

doesn't. So using += makes your code more general. There's no standard
sequence type that has extend and not +=, so worrying that += is
slower isn't a concern unless you're using a user-defined class. Even
then, it's probably a mistake that should be fixed in the class rather
than requiring .extend() to be used instead of +=.

--
Paul Hankin

Oct 18 '07 #8
Debajit Adhikary a écrit :
I have two lists:

a = [1, 2, 3]
b = [4, 5, 6]

What I'd like to do is append all of the elements of b at the end of
a, so that a looks like:

a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

I can do this using

map(a.append, b)
And what about a.extend(b) ?
How do I do this using a list comprehension?
Why would you want a list comp here ???
(In general, is using a list comprehension preferable (or more
"pythonic") as opposed to using map / filter etc.?)
Depends. Anyway, the pythonic solution here is to use the appropriate
list method !-)

Oct 18 '07 #9
Paul Hankin <pa*********@gmail.comwrites:
Not to me: I can never remember which of a.append and a.extend is
which.
Interesting, with me it's the other way around. Maybe it's because I
used Python before extend was available.
Falling back to a = a + b is exactly what you want.
Not if you want to mutate the original object, possibly referenced
from elsewhere.
Oct 18 '07 #10
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:57:10AM -0000, Paul Hankin wrote regarding Re: Appending a list's elements to another list using a list comprehension:
>
Not to me: I can never remember which of a.append and a.extend is
which. Falling back to a = a + b is exactly what you want. For
instance:

a = (1, 2, 3)
a += (4, 5, 6)

works, whereas:

a = (1, 2, 3)
a.extend((4, 5, 6))

doesn't. So using += makes your code more general. There's no standard
sequence type that has extend and not +=, so worrying that += is
slower isn't a concern unless you're using a user-defined class. Even
then, it's probably a mistake that should be fixed in the class rather
than requiring .extend() to be used instead of +=.
I was going to argue that in fact += is not more general, it just covers a different set of use cases, but then I tested my hypothesis...
>>a = [1,2,3]
b = a
c = [4,5,6]
d = c
e = [7,8,9]
a.extend(e)
b
[1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9]
>>c += e
d # I expected [4, 5, 6]
[4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
>>c = c + e # But += doesn't do the same as this
c
[4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 7, 8, 9]
>>d
[4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

So I learned something new.

Cheers,
Cliff
Oct 18 '07 #11

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

22
by: christof hoeke | last post by:
hello, this must have come up before, so i am already sorry for asking but a quick googling did not give me any answer. i have a list from which i want a simpler list without the duplicates an...
35
by: Moosebumps | last post by:
Does anyone here find the list comprehension syntax awkward? I like it because it is an expression rather than a series of statements, but it is a little harder to maintain it seems. e.g. you...
0
by: William Park | last post by:
1. Here is shell version of Python filter() for array. Essentially, you apply a command on each array element, and extract only those elements which it returns success (0). This is specialized...
24
by: Mahesh Padmanabhan | last post by:
Hi, When list comprehension was added to the language, I had a lot of trouble understanding it but now that I am familiar with it, I am not sure how I programmed in Python without it. Now I...
1
by: Ron Adam | last post by:
In my program I have a lot of statements that append elements, but sometimes I don't want to append the element so it requres an if statement to check it, and that requires assigning the returned...
7
by: greenflame | last post by:
I am trying to reorder elements of a list and I am stuck as to what might be the best way to approach this. I have a (main) list of elements and another (ordering) list (which is may shorter, but...
18
by: a | last post by:
can someone tell me how to use them thanks
4
by: Gregory Guthrie | last post by:
Sorry for a simple question- but I don't understand how to parse this use of a list comprehension. The "or" clauses are odd to me. It also seems like it is being overly clever (?) in using a...
33
by: John Salerno | last post by:
Is it possible to write a list comprehension for this so as to produce a list of two-item tuples? base_scores = range(8, 19) score_costs = print zip(base_scores, score_costs) I can't think...
2
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 7 Feb 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:30 (7.30PM). In this month's session, the creator of the excellent VBE...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
The formulas of 101 quantitative trading alphas used by WorldQuant were presented in the paper 101 Formulaic Alphas. However, some formulas are complex, leading to challenges in calculation. Take...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
0
by: Aftab Ahmad | last post by:
Hello Experts! I have written a code in MS Access for a cmd called "WhatsApp Message" to open WhatsApp using that very code but the problem is that it gives a popup message everytime I clicked on...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
1
by: PapaRatzi | last post by:
Hello, I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.