By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
439,931 Members | 2,015 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 439,931 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

How do I call anonymous classes from imported modules?

P: n/a
I am importing 3rd party modules via a plugin script. I wish to
iterate thru the modules and call a common method like .do_foobar() or
something with all the imports.
But I can't figure out how to do something like below without knowing
the class name before hand. Is there a builtin that helps call
classes anonymously?
(Calling example.do_foobar() works because I manually enter the classes' name)
>>a=MyApp()
sensorsList = []
for snames in a.pluginsDict["sensorsplugins"]:
sensorsList.append(__import__(snames))
>>sensorsList[0].example.do_foobar()
but I need something like
>>sensorsList[0][0].do_foobar()
because I will not know the plugin class names.

--
Later, Joe
Aug 20 '07 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
2 Replies


P: n/a
On 8/19/07, James Stroud <js*****@mbi.ucla.eduwrote:
Quick and dirty (you could also use a try: except:):

f = __import__(module_name)
for anobj in f.__dict__.values():
if hasattr(anobj, 'do_foobar'):
anobj.do_foobar()

Note that this does not test whether anobj is a class as this would
entail a type-check, which hints to poor design.
Thanks for the help. The __dict__.values() is something I have not
previously looked into but it does not work as desired because python
wants an instance of the class. How can I cast an object if I don't
know what type of object it is (example.ticker, in this debug)?
>>modname = sensorsList[0].__name__
m = __import__(modname)
for anobj in m.__dict__.values():
if hasattr(anobj, 'do_foobar'):
anobj.do_foobar()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#76>", line 3, in ?
anobj.do_foobar()
TypeError: unbound method do_foobar() must be called with ticker
instance as first argument (got nothing instead)
Aug 20 '07 #2

P: n/a
JoeSox wrote:
On 8/19/07, James Stroud <js*****@mbi.ucla.eduwrote:
>Quick and dirty (you could also use a try: except:):

f = __import__(module_name)
for anobj in f.__dict__.values():
if hasattr(anobj, 'do_foobar'):
anobj.do_foobar()

Note that this does not test whether anobj is a class as this would
entail a type-check, which hints to poor design.

Thanks for the help. The __dict__.values() is something I have not
previously looked into but it does not work as desired because python
wants an instance of the class. How can I cast an object if I don't
know what type of object it is (example.ticker, in this debug)?
>>>modname = sensorsList[0].__name__
m = __import__(modname)
for anobj in m.__dict__.values():
if hasattr(anobj, 'do_foobar'):
anobj.do_foobar()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#76>", line 3, in ?
anobj.do_foobar()
TypeError: unbound method do_foobar() must be called with ticker
instance as first argument (got nothing instead)
This was the poor design I was hinting to. do_foobar is type-checking
for ticker. "Casting" as you might think of it does not exist in python.
Creating new objects based on the values of existing objects (lets call
it "conversion" for lack of a better name) does (e.g. int(2.0)). But
this is not casting. Unless you have the power to re-author all of the
do_foobar()s to not type-check, you should create an instance of ticker
and pass that:

t = ticker(param1, param2, parametc)
[...]
anobj.do_foobar(t)

The "got nothing instead" means that you should have passed an
argument--and unfortunately whoever authored do_foobar() type-checked
for a ticker, which is not a desirable way to design an API.

James
Aug 20 '07 #3

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.