Most efficient way to evaluate the contents of a variable.

[bdude]

Hey, I'm new to python and am looking for the most efficient way to
see if the contents of a variable is equal to one of many options.

Cheers,
Bryce R

[Stargaming]

bdude schrieb:

Hey, I'm new to python and am looking for the most efficient way to
see if the contents of a variable is equal to one of many options.

Cheers,
Bryce R

if var in ('-h', '--hello', '-w', '--world'):
pass

Most maintenance-efficient, that is.

[Carsten Haese]

On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:37:19 +0200, Stargaming wrote

bdude schrieb:

Hey, I'm new to python and am looking for the most efficient way to
see if the contents of a variable is equal to one of many options.

Cheers,
Bryce R

if var in ('-h', '--hello', '-w', '--world'):
pass

Unless the list of choices is trivially small, a set performs membership tests
faster than a tuple:

$ python -m timeit -s "s=('eggs','spam','parrot')" "'eggs' in s"
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.177 usec per loop

$ python -m timeit -s "s=('eggs','spam','parrot')" "'spam' in s"
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.219 usec per loop

$ python -m timeit -s "s=('eggs','spam','parrot')" "'parrot' in s"
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.262 usec per loop

$ python -m timeit -s "s=('eggs','spam','parrot')" "'python' in s"
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.303 usec per loop

$ python -m timeit -s "s=set(('eggs','spam','parrot'))" "'eggs' in s"
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.192 usec per loop

$ python -m timeit -s "s=set(('eggs','spam','parrot'))" "'spam' in s"
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.192 usec per loop

$ python -m timeit -s "s=set(('eggs','spam','parrot'))" "'parrot' in s"
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.192 usec per loop

$ python -m timeit -s "s=set(('eggs','spam','parrot'))" "'python' in s"
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.189 usec per loop

--
Carsten Haese
http://informixdb.sourceforge.net