implementation of "in" that returns the object.

[Jorge Vargas]

Hi

I need to check if an object is in a list AND keep a reference to the
object I have done it this way but is there a better one?

>>def inplusplus(value,listObj):

.... for i in listObj:
.... if i is value:
.... return value
.... return False
....

>>l = [1,2,3,4]
print inplusplus(2,l)

2

>>print inplusplus(9,l)

False

>>print inplusplus(1,l)

1

>>l.append(0)
print inplusplus(0,l)

0

[Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch]

In <ma**************************************@python.o rg>, Jorge Vargas
wrote:

I need to check if an object is in a list AND keep a reference to the
object I have done it this way but is there a better one?

But you already *have* a reference to that object!?

>>>def inplusplus(value,listObj):

... for i in listObj:
... if i is value:
... return value
... return False
...

def my_in(value, sequence):
if value in sequence:
return value
else:
return False

Ciao,
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch

[Fredrik Lundh]

Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:

>>>>def inplusplus(value,listObj):

... for i in listObj:
... if i is value:
... return value
... return False
...

def my_in(value, sequence):
if value in sequence:
return value
else:
return False

however,

>>a = [1.0, 2, 3]

>>my_in(1, a)

1

>>my_in(2.0, a)

2.0

>>my_in(3L, a)

3L

so it all depends on what the OP means by "is in".

</F>

[Paul McGuire]

"Jorge Vargas" <jo**********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:ma**************************************@pyth on.org...

Hi

I need to check if an object is in a list AND keep a reference to the
object I have done it this way but is there a better one?

>>>def inplusplus(value,listObj):

... for i in listObj:
... if i is value:
... return value
... return False
...

>>>l = [1,2,3,4]
print inplusplus(2,l)

2

>>>print inplusplus(9,l)

False

>>>print inplusplus(1,l)

1

>>>l.append(0)
print inplusplus(0,l)

0

Just a couple of quick comments:
1. "if i is value" will check for identity, not equality. Your example with
small integers relies on a nonportable CPython implementation of using
cached objects. Check out this behavior:

>>def inplusplus(value,listObj):

.... for i in listObj:
.... if i is value:
.... return value
.... return False
....

>>a = 5
lst = [ 1,3,5,7 ]
inplusplus(5,lst)

5

>>inplusplus(a,lst)

5

>>lst.append( 123456789 )
inplusplus( 123456789,lst)

False

Instead of this loopy "is" test, just use "in":

>>def inplusplus(value,listObj):

.... if value in listObj: return value
.... return False
....

>>inplusplus( 123456789,lst)

123456789
2. What happens if "False" is in the list? How would you know?

-- Paul

[Paddy]

Jorge Vargas wrote:

Hi

I need to check if an object is in a list AND keep a reference to the
object I have done it this way but is there a better one?

>def inplusplus(value,listObj):

... for i in listObj:
... if i is value:
... return value
... return False
...

>l = [1,2,3,4]
print inplusplus(2,l)

2

>print inplusplus(9,l)

False

>print inplusplus(1,l)

1

>l.append(0)
print inplusplus(0,l)

0

You mentioned a ist of objects.
The following example will return the actual object matched in the ist
allowing you to later change any mutable object returned and see the
change reflected in the list:

>>x = [[0], [1], [2]]
y = [1]
def inref(val, lst):

.... try:
.... return lst[ lst.index(val) ]
.... except ValueError:
.... return False
....

>>z = inref(y, x)
z

[1]

>>z[0] = 33
z

[33]

>>x

[[0], [33], [2]]
Hope this helps - Paddy.

[Sion Arrowsmith]

Jorge Vargas <jo**********@gmail.comwrote:

>I need to check if an object is in a list AND keep a reference to the
object I have done it this way but is there a better one?

>>>def inplusplus(value,listObj):

... for i in listObj:
... if i is value:
... return value
... return False
...

try:
obj = listObj[listObj.index(value)]
# do something with obj
except ValueError:
# do whatever you're going to do if inplusplus returns False

Assuming you meant "if i == value" (as others have pointed out).

--
\S -- si***@chiark.greenend.org.uk -- http://www.chaos.org.uk/~sion/
___ | "Frankly I have no feelings towards penguins one way or the other"
\X/ | -- Arthur C. Clarke
her nu becomeþ se bera eadward ofdun hlæddre heafdes bæce bump bump bump

[Paul Rubin]

"Jorge Vargas" <jo**********@gmail.comwrites:

I need to check if an object is in a list AND keep a reference to the
object I have done it this way but is there a better one?

>def inplusplus(value,listObj):

... for i in listObj:
... if i is value:
... return value
... return False

That's bug-prone. Suppose the object's value is false (i.e. it's the
empty string, or None, or the boolean False, or whatever)? You're
best off raising an exception if the value is not found. You could
also do something like that using the list.index method.