Looping over a list question

[stephen]

I found myself writing:

for f in [i for i in datafiles if '.txt' in i]:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

but I was wishing that I could have instead written:

for f in in datafiles if '.txt' in f:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

Has there ever been a proposal for this? Just wondering ...

Stephen Boulet

[Christoph Haas]

On Tuesday 03 October 2006 19:50, st*****@theboulets.net wrote:

I found myself writing:

for f in [i for i in datafiles if '.txt' in i]:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

but I was wishing that I could have instead written:

for f in in datafiles if '.txt' in f:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

What about:
import glob
for filename in glob.glob('*.txt'):
print "Processing file", filename
...
Christoph

[Fredrik Lundh]

st*****@theboulets.net wrote:

I found myself writing:

for f in [i for i in datafiles if '.txt' in i]:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

but I was wishing that I could have instead written:

for f in in datafiles if '.txt' in f:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

Has there ever been a proposal for this?

probably. but unless your editor or keyboard is horribly broken, you
can of course press return at the right place instead:

for i in datafiles:
if '.txt' in i:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

(for this specific case, "endswith" is more reliable than "in", btw)

</F>

[mdsteele]

st*****@theboulets.net wrote:

I found myself writing:

for f in [i for i in datafiles if '.txt' in i]:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

but I was wishing that I could have instead written:

for f in in datafiles if '.txt' in f:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

Has there ever been a proposal for this? Just wondering ...

Stephen Boulet

Yes, there has:
http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.l...af21b68309415f

[stephen]

Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[snip]

probably. but unless your editor or keyboard is horribly broken, you
can of course press return at the right place instead:

for i in datafiles:
if '.txt' in i:
print 'Processing datafile %s' % f

(for this specific case, "endswith" is more reliable than "in", btw)

</F>

My "print" line is actually a long 40 line block. I guess I could just
do
datafiles = [f for f in datafiles if f.endswith('.txt')]
and then loop over it.

md******@gmail.com wrote:

Yes, there has:
http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.l...hread/thread/9...

Thanks for the link. I didn't know about str.startswith and
str.endswith, which I can see is very useful.

So, not a universally popular proposal. Interesting how different
programming 'phrasings' resonate with different people. For me, for
example, lambda causes my eyes to glaze over.

I do love list comprehensions though. I'd also love to see string
constants implemented some day too (like str.whitespace and
str.ascii_letters).

Stephen

[Fredrik Lundh]

st*****@theboulets.net wrote:

My "print" line is actually a long 40 line block.

and? if your editor isn't horribly broken, that shouldn't be much
of a problem.

(but you may want to refactor the code; if you have a processing
block that large, it's probably better to move all or parts of it
into a support function).

</F>

[Tim Chase]

I'd also love to see string constants implemented some day too

(like str.whitespace and str.ascii_letters).

You mean like the "string" module provides? :)

>>import string
print '\n'.join(["%s -%s" % (s, repr(eval('string.%s' %

s))) for s in dir(string) if isinstance(eval('string.%s' % s),
basestring) and not s.startswith('_')])

ascii_letters ->
'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVW XYZ'
ascii_lowercase -'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'
ascii_uppercase -'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ'
digits -'0123456789'
hexdigits -'0123456789abcdefABCDEF'
letters -'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVW XYZ'
lowercase -'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'
octdigits -'01234567'
printable ->
'0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLM NOPQRSTUVWXYZ!"#$
%&\'()*+,-./:;<=>?@[\\]^_`{|}~ \t\n\r\x0b\x0c'
punctuation -'!"#$%&\'()*+,-./:;<=>?@[\\]^_`{|}~'
uppercase -'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ'
whitespace -'\t\n\x0b\x0c\r '

>>string.lowercase

'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'

(you mentioned liking list comprehensions, so that ugly hack of a
one-liner extracts all the string properties of the "string"
module that don't begin with an underscore)

-tkc