Decorator cllass hides docstring from doctest?

[Berthold Höllmann]

Saving the following code to a file and running the code through
python does not give the expected error. disableling the "@decor" line
leads to the expected error message. Is this a bug or an overseen
feature?
--- snip dectest.py ---
class decor(object):
def __init__(self, f):
self.f = f
def __call__(self, *args, **kw):
return self.f(*args, **kw)

@decor
def f(a, b):
"""

>>f(1,2)

False

>>f(2,2)

False
"""
return a == b

def _test():
import doctest
doctest.testmod()

if __name__ == "__main__":
_test()
--- snip dectest.py ---

Our Python is:

Python 2.4.2 (#1, Dec 5 2005, 10:13:23)
[GCC 3.3.5 20050117 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
Thanks
Berthold
--
__ Address:
G / \ L Germanischer Lloyd
phone: [phone] -+----+- Vorsetzen 35 P.O.Box 111606
fax : [phone] \__/ D-20459 Hamburg D-20416 Hamburg

[Duncan Booth]

be******@despammed.com (Berthold =?iso-8859-15?Q?H=F6llmann?=) wrote:

Saving the following code to a file and running the code through
python does not give the expected error. disableling the "@decor" line
leads to the expected error message. Is this a bug or an overseen
feature?

It's a problem with your implementation of the decorator. In fact it is two
problems: the decorated 'f' is a class instance so doctest ignores it, and
it doesn't have a docstring so doctest ignores it.

If you rewrite the decorator so that the decorated 'f' is still a function
and preserve the docstring then it works as you might expect. e.g.

def decor(f):
def wrapper(*args, **kw):
return f(*args, **kw)
wrapper.__doc__ = f.__doc__
wrapper.__name__ = f.__name__
return wrapper

[Michele Simionato]

Berthold Höllmann wrote:

Saving the following code to a file and running the code through
python does not give the expected error. disableling the "@decor" line
leads to the expected error message. Is this a bug or an overseen
feature?

Others have already pointed out the mistake. I wrote a module to avoid
this kind of issues, so you
may want to check it out:

http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~micheles...mentation.html

Michele Simionato

[Peter Otten]

Berthold Höllmann wrote:

Saving the following code to a file and running the code through
python does not give the expected error. disableling the "@decor" line
leads to the expected error message. Is this a bug or an overseen
feature?

Neither, I'd say. Just an unfortunate interaction between doctest and
function decoration. For the most common case where one function is wrapped
by another, Python 2.5 has grown a "meta-decorator"

>>import functools
def deco(f):

.... @functools.wraps(f)
.... def g():
.... f()
.... return g
....

>>@deco

.... def f():
.... "yadda yadda"
....

>>f.__doc__

'yadda yadda'

but with callable objects you're on your own, I think.
I came up with:

def register_doctest(name, doc):
global __test__
if doc:
try:
__test__
except NameError:
__test__ = {name: doc}
else:
if name in __test__:
raise ValueError("name clash")
__test__[name] = doc

class decor(object):
def __init__(self, f):
self.f = f
register_doctest(f.__name__, f.__doc__)
def __call__(self, *args, **kw):
return self.f(*args, **kw)

@decor
def f(a, b):
"""

>>f(1,2)

False

>>f(2,2)

False
"""
return a == b

import doctest
doctest.testmod()

Peter