The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
Thanks.
----------------------------
import wx
class NumbersValidator(wx.PyValidator):
def __init__(self):
wx.PyValidator.__init__(self)
def Clone(self):
return NumbersValidator()
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try:
if not text or int(text) <= 0:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time
entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
else:
return True
except ValueError, error:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
def TransferToWindow(self):
return True
def TransferFromWindow(self):
return True
class Timer(wx.Frame):
def __init__(self):
wx.Frame.__init__(self, None, wx.ID_ANY, 'Timer',
style=wx.DEFAULT_FRAME_STYLE ^ wx.RESIZE_BORDER
^ wx.MAXIMIZE_BOX)
self.panel = wx.Panel(self)
mainSizer = wx.BoxSizer(wx.VERTICAL)
inputSizer = wx.BoxSizer(wx.HORIZONTAL)
self.progress = wx.Gauge(self.panel, wx.ID_ANY, 100, size=(300,
20))
self.status = wx.StaticText(self.panel, wx.ID_ANY, 'Enter a time.')
prompt = wx.StaticText(self.panel, wx.ID_ANY, 'Time to wait:')
self.input = wx.TextCtrl(self.panel, wx.ID_ANY, size=(20, 20),
validator=NumbersValidator())
self.start = wx.Button(self.panel, wx.ID_ANY, 'Start')
self.reset = wx.Button(self.panel, wx.ID_ANY, 'Reset')
self.reset.Disable()
self.sound = wx.Sound(r'C:\Windows\Media\notify.wav')
self.timer = wx.Timer(self)
mainSizer.Add(self.progress, flag=wx.ALIGN_CENTER | wx.ALL ^
wx.BOTTOM,
border=10)
mainSizer.Add(self.status, flag=wx.ALIGN_CENTER | wx.ALL,
border=10)
mainSizer.Add(inputSizer, flag=wx.ALIGN_CENTER | wx.BOTTOM,
border=10)
inputSizer.Add(prompt, flag=wx.ALIGN_CENTER)
inputSizer.Add(self.input, flag=wx.ALIGN_CENTER | wx.LEFT |
wx.RIGHT,
border=5)
inputSizer.Add(self.start, flag=wx.ALIGN_CENTER)
inputSizer.Add(self.reset, flag=wx.ALIGN_CENTER)
self.Bind(wx.EVT_TEXT_ENTER, self.OnStart, self.input)
self.Bind(wx.EVT_BUTTON, self.OnStart, self.start)
self.Bind(wx.EVT_TIMER, self.OnTimer, self.timer)
self.Bind(wx.EVT_BUTTON, self.OnReset, self.reset)
self.panel.SetSizer(mainSizer)
mainSizer.Fit(self)
def OnStart(self, event):
if self.panel.Validate():
self.time = int(self.input.GetValue())
self.minutes_passed = 1
self.minutes_remaining = self.time - 1
self.start.Disable()
self.input.Disable()
self.reset.Enable()
self.status.SetLabel('%s minute(s) remaining.' % self.time)
self.timer.Start(1000)
def OnReset(self, event):
if self.timer.IsRunning():
self.timer.Stop()
self.input.Clear()
self.input.Enable()
self.start.Enable()
self.reset.Disable()
self.status.SetLabel('Enter a new time.')
self.progress.SetValue(0)
self.minutes_passed = 1
def OnTimer(self, event):
if self.minutes_remaining != 0:
self.progress.SetValue(self.minutes_passed * 100 / self.time)
self.status.SetLabel('%s minute(s) remaining.' %
self.minutes_remaining)
self.minutes_passed += 1
self.minutes_remaining -= 1
else:
self.timer.Stop()
self.progress.SetValue(self.minutes_passed * 100 / self.time)
self.status.SetLabel('%s minute(s) have elapsed.' % self.time)
wx.Sound.Play(self.sound)
class MyApp(wx.App):
def OnInit(self):
frame = Timer()
self.SetTopWindow(frame)
frame.Show()
return True
if __name__ == '__main__':
app = MyApp(False)
app.MainLoop() 13 1725
John Salerno wrote:
The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
I cleaned it up a little and did this, but of course this doesn't work.
Is this the wrong way to create a function (not method) within a class?
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try:
if not text or int(text) <= 0:
error_message()
return False
else:
return True
except ValueError:
error_message()
return False
@staticmethod
def error_message():
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
John Salerno wrote:
John Salerno wrote:
The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
I cleaned it up a little and did this, but of course this doesn't work.
Is this the wrong way to create a function (not method) within a class?
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try:
if not text or int(text) <= 0:
error_message()
return False
else:
return True
except ValueError:
error_message()
return False
@staticmethod
def error_message():
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
Your indentation looks off. Your error_message() function should be at
the same indentation as the rest of the body of the Validate() method
(i.e. same as the try statement, "text_ctrl = ..." statements.)
If that's not an artifact of posting it here then you'll need to
correct that.
Also, there's no need to declare the function a staticmethod, since it
isn't.
Other than that it looks ok to me, but I might have missed something.
Peace,
~Simon
Simon Forman wrote:
John Salerno wrote:
John Salerno wrote:
The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
I cleaned it up a little and did this, but of course this doesn't work.
Is this the wrong way to create a function (not method) within a class?
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try:
if not text or int(text) <= 0:
error_message()
return False
else:
return True
except ValueError:
error_message()
return False
@staticmethod
def error_message():
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
Your indentation looks off. Your error_message() function should be at
the same indentation as the rest of the body of the Validate() method
(i.e. same as the try statement, "text_ctrl = ..." statements.)
If that's not an artifact of posting it here then you'll need to
correct that.
Also, there's no need to declare the function a staticmethod, since it
isn't.
Other than that it looks ok to me, but I might have missed something.
Maybe I did miss something: Are you actually trying to make a static
method? Say, to be able to call it elsewhere than just the Validate()
method?
In that case, your indentation is still (apparently) off, but the
error_message() method (a staticmethod is still a method I think, but I
could be wrong) should be at the same indentation level as any other
method, and you have to prepend the instance object ('self.' if you're
calling it from inside another method) to it when you call it.
class A(object):
def meth(self, arg):
self.func(arg)
@staticmethod
def func(arg):
print arg
a = A()
a.func("hi")
a.meth("world.")
# prints
hi
world.
HTH,
~Simon
Here's how I would do it:
def Validate(self, parent):
try:
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
if not text: raise ValueError
if int(text) <= 0: raise ValueError
return True
except ValueError, error:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time
entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
John Salerno wrote:
The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
Thanks.
----------------------------
import wx
class NumbersValidator(wx.PyValidator):
def __init__(self):
wx.PyValidator.__init__(self)
def Clone(self):
return NumbersValidator()
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try:
if not text or int(text) <= 0:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time
entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
else:
return True
except ValueError, error:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
well, assuming you are unsatisfied with the above, you could try to assert the
validation condition and catch together all failures, eg :
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try :
assert int(text)>0
return True
except (ValueError,AssertionError) :
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
hth, BB
John Salerno wrote:
John Salerno wrote:
The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
I cleaned it up a little and did this, but of course this doesn't work.
Is this the wrong way to create a function (not method) within a class?
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try:
if not text or int(text) <= 0:
error_message()
return False
else:
return True
except ValueError:
error_message()
return False
@staticmethod
def error_message():
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
If you're not really interested in methods, static or otherwise, and
actually just want a cleaner Validate() method, I would code it as
follows (note that calling int() on an empty string will raise
ValueError):
def Validate(self, parent):
text = self.GetWindow().GetValue()
try:
T = int(text)
except ValueError:
result = False
else:
result = T 0
if not result:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return result
Peace,
~Simon
Boris Borcic wrote:
John Salerno wrote:
The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
Thanks.
----------------------------
import wx
class NumbersValidator(wx.PyValidator):
def __init__(self):
wx.PyValidator.__init__(self)
def Clone(self):
return NumbersValidator()
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try:
if not text or int(text) <= 0:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time
entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
else:
return True
except ValueError, error:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
well, assuming you are unsatisfied with the above, you could try to assert the
validation condition and catch together all failures, eg :
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try :
assert int(text)>0
return True
except (ValueError,AssertionError) :
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
hth, BB
Assertion statements "go away" when you run python with the '-O' or
'-OO' options. They're only meant for debugging and shouldn't be used
as part of your actual program logic.
You run the risk of introducing hard-to-find bugs if you use them like
this and somebody, somewhere, sometime runs your code in "optimized"
mode.
Peace,
~Simon
John Salerno wrote:
The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
Thanks.
----------------------------
import wx
class NumbersValidator(wx.PyValidator):
def __init__(self):
wx.PyValidator.__init__(self)
def Clone(self):
return NumbersValidator()
def Validate(self, parent):
text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try:
if not text or int(text) <= 0:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time
entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
else:
return True
except ValueError, error:
wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
return False
def TransferToWindow(self):
return True
def TransferFromWindow(self):
return True
Here's how I might do it:
def is_positive_int_str(s):
try:
value = int(s)
except ValueError:
return False
return value 0
class PositiveIntegerValidator(wx.PyValidator):
# ...
def Validate(self, parent):
text = self.GetWindow().GetValue()
if is_positive_int_str(text):
return True
wx.MessageBox(...)
return False
Two usability notes:
- "Invalid time entered" is a confusing message when you actually want a
positive integer.
- Pop-up messages are a major annoyance. An alternative would be to change
the text color of the control and show a hint as to what input you expect
in a status bar.
Peter
Peter Otten wrote:
John Salerno wrote:
>The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class, just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
Thanks.
----------------------------
import wx
class NumbersValidator(wx.PyValidator):
def __init__(self): wx.PyValidator.__init__(self)
def Clone(self): return NumbersValidator()
def Validate(self, parent): text_ctrl = self.GetWindow() text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try: if not text or int(text) <= 0: wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time
entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR) return False else: return True except ValueError, error: wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR) return False
def TransferToWindow(self): return True
def TransferFromWindow(self): return True
Here's how I might do it:
def is_positive_int_str(s):
try:
value = int(s)
except ValueError:
return False
return value 0
class PositiveIntegerValidator(wx.PyValidator):
# ...
def Validate(self, parent):
text = self.GetWindow().GetValue()
if is_positive_int_str(text):
return True
wx.MessageBox(...)
return False
Two usability notes:
- "Invalid time entered" is a confusing message when you actually want a
positive integer.
- Pop-up messages are a major annoyance. An alternative would be to change
the text color of the control and show a hint as to what input you expect
in a status bar.
Peter
Thanks for all the help guys! I'm going to rework it a little and see
what happens. Luckily, I'm also reading the chapter on exceptions in
Python in a Nutshell, so maybe that will help solidify my understanding
of how to construct them in this situation.
Simon Forman wrote:
Maybe I did miss something: Are you actually trying to make a static
method? Say, to be able to call it elsewhere than just the Validate()
method?
I don't know if a static method is the best way to do it, but what I was
trying to do was make a regular function within the validator class, so
that I could call it whenever I needed to show that error message. I
suppose I could just use a regular method to do it, too, but it seems
more like a utility function than a method that requires 'self'.
My identation seems correct to me (and I get no errors about it), but
it's still not working the way I have it. Maybe I shouldn't mess with
decorators right now anyway...
John Salerno wrote:
The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
Ok, I came up with this. It looks much nicer, I think, though I'm still
unsure if it's good to have three separate return statements:
def Validate(self, parent):
text = self.GetWindow().GetValue()
try:
if int(text) != 0:
return True
else:
self.error_message()
return False
except ValueError:
self.error_message()
return False
But instead of a pop-up box for the error, I've decided to take Peter's
advice and change the status text instead (plus color the input box).
But here's an ultra OO newbie question: how do I refer to my frame's
children from within the validator class? :)
John Salerno <jo******@NOSPAMgmail.comwrote:
try:
if int(text) != 0:
return True
else:
self.error_message()
return False
except ValueError:
self.error_message()
return False
One possible refactoring would be:
try:
if int(text) != 0:
return True
except:
pass
self.error_message()
return False
It's two less lines of code, one less return, and eliminates the
duplicate call to error_message(). On the other hand, the "except:
pass" clause is unusual and would make me (as a reader of the code)
stop and think what was going on. Pick your poison.
If you want to be truly cryptic and obfuscatory, there's always:
try:
1 / int(text)
return True
except:
return False
Simon Forman wrote:
Boris Borcic wrote:
>John Salerno wrote:
>>The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class, just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
Thanks.
----------------------------
import wx
class NumbersValidator(wx.PyValidator):
def __init__(self): wx.PyValidator.__init__(self)
def Clone(self): return NumbersValidator()
def Validate(self, parent): text_ctrl = self.GetWindow() text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
try: if not text or int(text) <= 0: wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR) return False else: return True except ValueError, error: wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR) return False
well, assuming you are unsatisfied with the above, you could try to assert the validation condition and catch together all failures, eg :
def Validate(self, parent): text_ctrl = self.GetWindow() text = text_ctrl.GetValue() try : assert int(text)>0 return True except (ValueError,AssertionError) : wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR) return False
hth, BB
Assertion statements "go away" when you run python with the '-O' or
'-OO' options.
Makes me wonder how many use those options. I never do, this explains that.
They're only meant for debugging and shouldn't be used
as part of your actual program logic.
That's too bad, and bound to evolve if the logic object space of Pypy gains users.
You run the risk of introducing hard-to-find bugs if you use them like
this and somebody, somewhere, sometime runs your code in "optimized"
mode.
Well, I wouldn't formulate it quite like that, but, as you say,...
Peace,
~Simon
Well, in that case let's just define
def fail(exc) : raise exc
and replace
assert int(text)>0
by
int(text)>0 or fail(ValueError)
cheers, BB
--
"On naît tous les mètres du même monde" This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Michael Ellis |
last post by:
Hi,
I have some data files with lines in space-delimited <name> <value>
format. There are multiple name-value pairs per line.
Is there a cleaner idiom than the following for reading each line...
|
by: Al Moritz |
last post by:
Hi all,
I was always told that the conversion of Word files to HTML as done by
Word itself sucks - you get a lot of unnecessary code that can
influence the design on web browsers other than...
|
by: Prowler |
last post by:
In the application we are currently building, we need to write positioning
code on-the-fly, based upon the screen offset of the element in the AS/400
application which drives the Web app. The 400,...
|
by: Bennett Haselton |
last post by:
I've noticed that if you enter the following code in the codebehind
page for an .aspx page, it won't compile because the call to
Trace.Write() is not valid except in methods of a class derived from...
|
by: Peter Olcott |
last post by:
Cab you write code directly in the Common Intermediate language? I need to
optimize a critical real-time function.
|
by: John Salerno |
last post by:
Hi guys. I'm looking for a nicer, more compact way of writing this code.
It doesn't have to be anything fancy, just something without the
duplication and preferably only one return statement.
...
|
by: Chris Allen |
last post by:
I am confused on one aspect of exception handling. If you specify the
exception object type to match in an except statement it is possible
to also obtain the exception object itself, but I can't...
|
by: =?Utf-8?B?cm9kY2hhcg==?= |
last post by:
hey all,
please reference: http://pastebin.com/mef78b3d
As shown in the reference I am dynamically building my controls in my class.
I'd like to be able to attach javascript calls as...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| |