Subclassing array

[TG]

Hi.

i've already something about inheriting from array a few weeks ago and
had my answer. But again, there is something that I don't understand.
Here is my vector class, which works quite well :

class Vector(array):
def __new__(cls,length,data=None):
return super(Vector,cls).__new__(cls,'f')

def __init__(self,length,data=None):
if data == None:
for _ in xrange(length):
self.append(0.0)
else:
for i in xrange(length):
self.append(data[i])

Now, i want to inherit from this vector class :

class Stimulus(Vector):
def __init__(self,width,height,label,data=None):
Vector.__init__(self,width*height,data)
self.width = width
self.height = height
self.label = label

This doesn't seem to work :

s = Stimulus(10,10,"data")

TypeError: __new__() takes at most 3 arguments (4 given)

In order to make it work, it seems that I have to redefine __new__
again, like this.

def __new__(cls,width,height,label,data=None):
return super(Stimulus,cls).__new__(cls,width*height)

Why is that ?
When I call Vector.__init__() in Stimulus, doesn't it also call __new__
? I don't understand the detail of callings to __new__ and __init__ in
python inheritance ...

[Alex Martelli]

TG <gi****@gmail.com> wrote:
...

When I call Vector.__init__() in Stimulus, doesn't it also call __new__
? I don't understand the detail of callings to __new__ and __init__ in
python inheritance ...

Calling a (new-style) class does __new__ first, THEN calls the class's
__init__ on the resulting instance -- and the arguments you're passing
when calling the class go to both __new__ and __init__.
Alex

[Sion Arrowsmith]

Alex Martelli <al*****@yahoo.com> wrote:

TG <gi****@gmail.com> wrote:

When I call Vector.__init__() in Stimulus, doesn't it also call __new__
? I don't understand the detail of callings to __new__ and __init__ in
python inheritance ...

Calling a (new-style) class does __new__ first, THEN calls the class's
__init__ on the resulting instance -- and the arguments you're passing
when calling the class go to both __new__ and __init__.

.... so you might want something like:

class Vector(array):
def __new__(cls,*args):
return super(Vector,cls).__new__(cls,'f')

--
\S -- si***@chiark.greenend.org.uk -- http://www.chaos.org.uk/~sion/
___ | "Frankly I have no feelings towards penguins one way or the other"
\X/ | -- Arthur C. Clarke
her nu becomeþ se bera eadward ofdun hlæddre heafdes bæce bump bump bump

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Sion Arrowsmith a écrit :

Alex Martelli <al*****@yahoo.com> wrote:

TG <gi****@gmail.com> wrote:

When I call Vector.__init__() in Stimulus, doesn't it also call __new__
? I don't understand the detail of callings to __new__ and __init__ in
python inheritance ...

Calling a (new-style) class does __new__ first, THEN calls the class's
__init__ on the resulting instance -- and the arguments you're passing
when calling the class go to both __new__ and __init__.

... so you might want something like:

class Vector(array):
def __new__(cls,*args):
return super(Vector,cls).__new__(cls,'f')

And if you want to support named arguments:

class Vector(array):
def __new__(cls,*args, **kw):
return super(Vector,cls).__new__(cls,'f')

[TG]

That's great, thanks !

To put it short, when I create a Stimulus object, it first seek
__new__() method. But if I don't define it, it looks for the one
defined in Vector. This raises a problem because the parameters passed
to Stimulus(params) aren't fitting with Vector parameters, raising an
exception.

That's why I have to use this *arg **kw syntax in order to allow my
subclasses having any arguments without causing troubles. Am I right ?

[bruno at modulix]

TG wrote:

That's great, thanks !

To put it short, when I create a Stimulus object, it first seek
__new__() method. But if I don't define it, it looks for the one
defined in Vector. This raises a problem because the parameters passed
to Stimulus(params) aren't fitting with Vector parameters, raising an
exception.

That's why I have to use this *arg **kw syntax in order to allow my
subclasses having any arguments without causing troubles. Am I right ?

To put it short : yes !-)

--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in 'o****@xiludom.gro'.split('@')])"