473,320 Members | 1,945 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,320 software developers and data experts.

Rekall Binary

So, Rekall is now GPLed. However, after a quick look at theKompany's
website I see that they charge $69.95 for the download version. And
looking at the rekallrevealed.org site I only see the source available
for download. I am not complaining about it, but I see this as a good
opportunity for someone to offer a $40.00 binary version available for
download. And, then someone else might want to offer one for $20.00.
And then ...

Ok. This is silly. Why doesn't theKompany simply offer the binary
version available for free and offer support contracts, as other
apparently successful companies are doing? That would at least spead
up Rekall's penetration in the market, and prevent the scenario I
describe above.

Sincerely wondering,
-Ruben
Jul 18 '05 #1
6 1765
It looks like

TotalRekall sells the GPL version for 15 pounds:

http://www.totalrekall.co.uk/modules...me=CCart&id=16

Which seems in keeping with:

"...small charge for Rekall binary distributions to cover our costs"

By the way, it's still not clear how strong a busness model it is to
give away GPL software and expect to make money off services. Have you
seen what RedHat is now doing?

In any case, I don't think there is anything wrong with charging more
than distribution costs for a binary version of GPL'd program. Creating
binaries that work on various versions of various platforms and
providing a nice installer for them is quite a bit of work. Also, the
GPL is about freedom: not cheap software. The idea is that it a good
thing for all involved for users to have access to source code. That is
very different than providing inexpensive software for folks that can't
figure out how to compile something (or can't be bothered). Those folks
will not be contirbuting to the p[roject, and will not be using the code
in their own projects.

That being said, I'm very happy that I can get so much open source
software in nicely packaged binary (or easy to compile) form. I only
contribute to a VERY SMALL fraction of all the free software I use.

-Chris

Jul 18 '05 #2
root <Ch**********@noaa.gov> wrote in message news:<bs**********@news.nems.noaa.gov>...
It looks like

TotalRekall sells the GPL version for 15 pounds:
That's my point. (Any takers for $10?)

http://www.totalrekall.co.uk/modules...me=CCart&id=16

Which seems in keeping with:

"...small charge for Rekall binary distributions to cover our costs"

By the way, it's still not clear how strong a busness model it is to
give away GPL software and expect to make money off services. Have you
seen what RedHat is now doing?
How strong a buisness model is GPL software is a relative issue. If
you mean making the kind of money that software developer houses used
to make in the BOS (Before Open Source) days then it isn't. But you
just may be able to support your family on it and pay the rent (and
maybe even buy a modest house if you are really successful). I see
nothing wrong with that. This are hard times you know.

In any case, I don't think there is anything wrong with charging more
than distribution costs for a binary version of GPL'd program. Creating
binaries that work on various versions of various platforms and
providing a nice installer for them is quite a bit of work.
True. And that may be so in this particular project. Still, if any
one offers a $10 version they'll sweep that part of the "business
model". Not a very strong model in my opinion. By going GPL, the
developers made a decision to leave the old BOS way of competing and
taking on the new one.
GPL is about freedom: not cheap software. The idea is that it a good
thing for all involved for users to have access to source code. That is
very different than providing inexpensive software for folks that can't
figure out how to compile something (or can't be bothered). Those folks
will not be contirbuting to the p[roject, and will not be using the code
in their own projects.
However, those folks sometimes get the software into their companies
and demostrate to their peers how productive it is. This in turn
sometimes results in the application proliferating on the enterprise
to the point where support is needed or desired by the CIO or the CEO.

That being said, I'm very happy that I can get so much open source
software in nicely packaged binary (or easy to compile) form. I only
contribute to a VERY SMALL fraction of all the free software I use.


But have you talked to others about it, or directly passed it on?
That is, even in a very little way, contributing to the health of the
projects in question.
Jul 18 '05 #3
ny**********@yahoo.com (R.Marquez) writes:
How strong a buisness model is GPL software is a relative issue. If
you mean making the kind of money that software developer houses used
to make in the BOS (Before Open Source) days then it isn't. But you
just may be able to support your family on it and pay the rent (and
maybe even buy a modest house if you are really successful). I see
nothing wrong with that. This are hard times you know.


An acquaintance of mine started a GPL-centric company, Cygnus
Solutions, that at first mainly supported GCC. One of the first
things he did as sufficient profits appeared was bought himself a
Maserati with the license plate "GNU CC". He did that specifically to
show off how one could make money doing free software. The company
was later sold to Red Hat, another GPL-centric company, for an amount
in excess of $100 million.
Jul 18 '05 #4
>
How strong a buisness model is GPL software is a relative issue. If
you mean making the kind of money that software developer houses used
to make in the BOS (Before Open Source) days then it isn't. But you
just may be able to support your family on it and pay the rent (and
maybe even buy a modest house if you are really successful). I see
nothing wrong with that. This are hard times you know.


"The Kompany" wasn't able to pay the developer for month with non GPL
software, why do you think they can do it with GPL now (if you say
yourself that it will be less then in the BOS days) ?

In fact i believe that a main stream desktop tool like "Rekall" has no
future when it must live on support contracts only. If you need
support then the product has an error, but i don't want to use
errounous software. This is the reason why GPL does not work for a lot
of software products.
Jul 18 '05 #5
ll*****@web.de (Lothar Scholz) wrote in message news:<6e**************************@posting.google. com>...

[snip]
In fact i believe that a main stream desktop tool like "Rekall" has no
future when it must live on support contracts only. If you need
support then the product has an error, but i don't want to use
errounous software. This is the reason why GPL does not work for a lot
of software products.


Every non trival product has errors. ( And most trival product ;) )

Support charges "seem to me" to be one of the most popular ways for
Open Source devlopers to make an income. Coupled with the fact that
most sane IT managers won't rely on unsupport software it seems to
make alot of sense.

Note: IT managers will rely on "officially unsupported" software if it
has an excellent track record, i.e. Debian, in the same breath why do
so many companies buy Linux supported distributions (i.e. Red Hat)?

Regards,

Ray Smith
Jul 18 '05 #6
ll*****@web.de (Lothar Scholz) wrote in message news:<6e**************************@posting.google. com>...
"The Kompany" wasn't able to pay the developer for month with non GPL
software, why do you think they can do it with GPL now (if you say
yourself that it will be less then in the BOS days) ?
Yes, I think the Kompany is in a difficult spot. I think they waited
too long to release Rekall as GPL. The reality today is that we live
in the shadows of a huge monoply. Basically, the only way that I (and
many others) see to compete with an application that is part of that
monopoly is through Open Source/Free software.

I am not against closed source or proprietary software in principle
(except on the Operating System layer where I think that closed source
has no place since it prevents a level playing field). I am happy
that developers have the choice. But, until the grip of the monopoly
is relaxed, or Linux takes off, I see no point in trying to compete
with them that way.

There are already products appearing on the same space that are going
to give Rekall even more competition in the cross platform space (e.g.
Omins Studio, Kylix, etc). I want to see Rekall succeed, mainly
because it uses Python. So, at this point I think it would be better
for the developers to provide it for free and build up a loyal base of
users and bug/patch submitters.
In fact i believe that a main stream desktop tool like "Rekall" has no
future when it must live on support contracts only. If you need
support then the product has an error, but i don't want to use
errounous software. This is the reason why GPL does not work for a lot
of software products.


I think Rekall has great potential. With a little imagination and
creativity it could offer things such as a plug in mechanism that
would allow it to perform many things beyond the basics. The
developers could offer some of these pluggins in a closed source
fashion if they chose, without alienating the rest of the Rekall
community, and without sacrificing quality.

Any way, this are my two cents worth.

-Ruben
Jul 18 '05 #7

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
by: BadJake | last post by:
Hi The Rekall documentation of available from http://www.totalrekall.co.uk and http://www.rygannon.com. You find them in PDF, HTML and Windows HTML Help format -- Best Regards John
11
by: John Dean | last post by:
Hi It gives me great pleasure to inform you that Rekall, the cross-platform alternative to MS Access, is now totally GPL. So please visit http://www.totalrekall.co.uk and download download a...
2
by: Tony of Judicious | last post by:
Not sure if this is right ng but i'm trying to install Rekall on Suse 9 prof During ./configure i get the msg: checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X includes. Please check your...
13
by: yaipa | last post by:
What would be the common sense way of finding a binary pattern in a ..bin file, say some 200 bytes, and replacing it with an updated pattern of the same length at the same offset? Also, the...
20
by: Christian Stigen Larsen | last post by:
A signed int reserves one bit to signify whether a number is positive or negative. In light of this, a colleague asked me whether there existed an int in C++ that was -0, a zero with the negative...
3
by: Tron Thomas | last post by:
What does binary mode for an ofstream object do anyway? Despite which mode the stream uses, operator << writes numeric value as their ASCII representation. I read on the Internet that it is...
9
by: Ching-Lung | last post by:
Hi all, I try to create a tool to check the delta (diff) of 2 binaries and create the delta binary. I use binary formatter (serialization) to create the delta binary. It works fine but the...
10
by: rory | last post by:
I can't seem to append a string to the end of a binary file. I'm using the following code: fstream outFile("test.exe", ios::in | ios::out | ios::binary | ios::ate | ios::app)...
16
by: Erwin Moller | last post by:
Why is a binary file executable? Is any binary file executable? Is only binary file executable? Are all executable files binary? What is the connection between the attribute of binary and that of...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: jfyes | last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
1
by: PapaRatzi | last post by:
Hello, I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
0
by: CloudSolutions | last post by:
Introduction: For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
0
by: Shællîpôpï 09 | last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
0
by: af34tf | last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.