469,266 Members | 2,023 Online
Bytes | Developer Community
New Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Post your question to a community of 469,266 developers. It's quick & easy.

questions about a C++ COM object accessed in Python via win32com

Hi

I am coding a C++ COM object which I want to access in Python. For that
I do have some detail questions and need help since I am not that familiar
with the documentation itself of Python and win32com yet.
1.
How do I know that...

import win32com.client

....was successful or not?
2.
In my COM object I do have the following C++ function:

STDMETHODIMP CMyTestObjekt::Connect()
{
if (m_boolReadyToConnect == false) {
return E_FAIL;
}
return S_OK;
}

How do I know in Python whether I got back a S_OK or an E_FAIL? Or is this
whole concept wrong and I should better make an additional return value like:

MyFunktion(......., [out, retval] BOOL *pVal); (declaration in the IDL)
3.
If I execute the following command...

MyObject = win32com.client.Dispatch("MyCOM.MySuperCOMObject")

....what is the return value from which I know whether it was successful?
Or what can be the ""content"" of "MyObject" afterwards?
4.
If I have a function in Python in which I call the (global) COM Object,
what "if" do I have to use to know whether the COM object already had
been allocated? I tried the following but that didn't work:

def foo():
if MyObject == None:
print "COM not there yet"
else:
print MyObject.Message
I'd really appreciate any help. Or even a hint where to look in the "original"
documentation. FYI: I do use Win2000 and ActiveState ActivePython 2.2 which
already includes win32com.

Bye,
Matthias "T.T.H." Grobe
Jul 18 '05 #1
3 1876
T.T.H. wrote:
Hi

I am coding a C++ COM object which I want to access in Python. For that
I do have some detail questions and need help since I am not that familiar
with the documentation itself of Python and win32com yet.
1.
How do I know that...

import win32com.client

...was successful or not?
If it fails, it raises an exception -- so, if you want to handle the
failure, you try this statement in the try clause of a try/except
statement. That is reasonably similar to C++'s exception (syntax
apart), so the concept shouldn't be too alien.

2.
In my COM object I do have the following C++ function:

STDMETHODIMP CMyTestObjekt::Connect()
{
if (m_boolReadyToConnect == false) {
return E_FAIL;
}
return S_OK;
}

How do I know in Python whether I got back a S_OK or an E_FAIL? Or is this
E_FAIL translates into an exception.
whole concept wrong and I should better make an additional return value
like:

MyFunktion(......., [out, retval] BOOL *pVal); (declaration in the IDL)
This would be much more COM-idiomatic, unless the failure IS an exceptional
event, something that SHOULD not happen in a well-functioning system and
probably the result of mis-configuration or hardware malfunctioning.

3.
If I execute the following command...

MyObject = win32com.client.Dispatch("MyCOM.MySuperCOMObject")

...what is the return value from which I know whether it was successful?
Guess...?-) Yep: if it's not successful it raises an exception!
Or what can be the ""content"" of "MyObject" afterwards?
If an exception wasn't raised, MyObject is an instance of some class
(you need not care about which one...) on which you can call methods
(which will be "proxied" to the actual C++-implemented COM object).

4.
If I have a function in Python in which I call the (global) COM Object,
what "if" do I have to use to know whether the COM object already had
been allocated? I tried the following but that didn't work:

def foo():
if MyObject == None:
print "COM not there yet"
else:
print MyObject.Message


If name "MyObject" has never been bound, trying to access it will...
I give you three guesses... *raise an exception*!

However, I _would_ suggest that in this case you set MyObject=None
at a global level and test as above (except, use "Myobject is None"
rather than ==) -- that is more idiomatic in Python.
Alex

Jul 18 '05 #2
> Alex Martelli <al***@aleax.it>

Praise you, Alex, that was the most precise answer I could have imagined!

Bye,
T.T.H.
Jul 18 '05 #3
> Alex Martelli <al***@aleax.it>

Praise you, Alex, that was the most precise answer I could have imagined!

Bye,
T.T.H.
Jul 18 '05 #4

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

3 posts views Thread by Mikko Ohtamaa | last post: by
3 posts views Thread by Fernando Gabrieli | last post: by
1 post views Thread by Gijs Korremans | last post: by
1 post views Thread by Gijs Korremans | last post: by
5 posts views Thread by bg_ie | last post: by
1 post views Thread by CARIGAR | last post: by
reply views Thread by zhoujie | last post: by
reply views Thread by suresh191 | last post: by
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.