473,406 Members | 2,763 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,406 software developers and data experts.

Haskell distutils-type system

Hello Python Community. I bring greetings from the Haskell community
(http://www.haskell.org) ;)

There has been a lot of discussion of late about creating a
grand-unified build & distribution system for "3rd party" Haskell
libraries (those not distributed with the compilers). Python's
Distutils has come up a few times. The Haskell Library Infrastructure
Project's web page is just a wiki page which can be found here:
http://www.haskell.org/hawiki/LibraryInfrastructure. I'm running this
project.

I also wear another hat in that I'm interested in maintaining Debian
packages related to Haskell, so I want to make my job easier by 1)
writing software support, and 2) making it easy for other people to
maintain Debian packages so I don't have to :)

I've read much of the documentation at
http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/doc/. I've also made a toy
Python program that uses distutils. It occurs to me that the issues
that were facing the Python community are strikingly similar to those
facing the Haskell community now, except perhaps for the fact that
there are at least 3 very strong Haskell "compilers" that we want to
support.

One idea for this distribution system, which we're calling the Library
Infrastructure Project, is to create a nice gmake-based build system,
document it, and leave it at that. Another idea is to use a
Haskell-based Distutils type system. Now I think that the
Haskell-based system should work out-of-the-box for pure-haskell
modules (no extensions), and maybe wrap a more complex make-based
system where necessary (as when interfacing with C or using
preprocessors). I definitely want to optimize for the common case of
joe-haskell-programmer wanting a nice way to distribute modules to his
friends, but of course I also want to allow Haskell developers to do
more complex things.

The main issues facing us are:

1) there are a variety of Haskell "compiler" implementations, one of
which is an interpreter :)

2) not all Haskell implementations are available on all architectures
(ghc for instance)

3) just about every Haskell "compiler" and release is
binary-incompatible, (except maybe for nhc98). That is, if we were
going to distribute binary libraries, we'd need different binaries for
ghc4, ghc5, and ghc6. Also we'd need different binaries for profiling
versions of the libraries, etc.

For instance, if I were to create a binary package HUnit, which is a
simple case since its pure Haskell code, I would need:
hunit-{hugs,nhc98} hunit-ghc{4,5,6} hunit-ghc{4,5,6}-prof

And whenever a new version of GHC6 is released (for instance), all of
the packages like hunit-ghc6 would need to be updated at the same
time. That doesn't even get into the issues of the wide variety of
preprocessors that are common in this rapidly advancing language[1].
So all of this suggests to me that we want to keep a global list of
installed libraries and recompile them whenever a new Haskell
"compiler" gets installed. This is why I want an abstraction layer
above make.

So I want to ask you if you can think of any obvious things we should
watch out for if we try to do something similar to what Python is
doing.

Also, there was some mention (in the related "summary of the
Developer's Day session") of Python's distutils creating a Makefile
and wrapping calls to make, is this what you're doing?

Do you / did you find yourself duplicating a lot of what make already
does, ie dependencies, etc, or do you utilize make?

What about configuration, do you typically interface with autoconf
somehow, or does distutils have its own way to figure out
configuration details?

Is a typical distutils setup.py program pretty much like what we see
in the example documentation? The developer provides some meta-data
and gets a distribution tool? Is there any support for more complex
stuff like interfacing with external systems?

Does distutils handle dependencies?

I've hacked together something that creates a source tarball and a
basic Debian package from a Haskell version of the distutils-type
metadata. I can make that available in a few days if anyone is
interested.

peace,

isaac

[1] Haskell is designed to have a "stable" version, Haskell98, and the
compilers come with a variety of extensions so that it is very useful
as a research language as well.

Jul 18 '05 #1
3 1936
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 16:34, Gerhard Häring wrote:
Do you / did you find yourself duplicating a lot of what make already
does, ie dependencies, etc, or do you utilize make?


AFAIK Python's distutils doesn't know about dependencies.


It seems clear to me that distutils would have no use for make's
dependencies. distutils is for distribution of modules, not the
iterative development of those modules. When you build a C extension,
you are always going to compile every file, since you are starting from
scratch. Make's dependencies are only for speeding the developer's life
as they change individual files, it's not for the extension user or
installer.

Ian

Jul 18 '05 #2
Quoth Isaac Jones <ij****@syntaxpolice.org>:
....
| One idea for this distribution system, which we're calling the Library
| Infrastructure Project, is to create a nice gmake-based build system,
| document it, and leave it at that.

If it can be plain make, instead of gmake, that would be closer
my idea of "nice". That has been one of Python's strengths since
early on, easy to build on a variety of platforms and doesn't
impose gratuitous requirements like needing GNU make or Perl
(can you imagine?)

| ... Another idea is to use a
| Haskell-based Distutils type system.
....

| What about configuration, do you typically interface with autoconf
| somehow, or does distutils have its own way to figure out
| configuration details?

This is not one of distutils' strengths. I think the answer to both
is "no" - there isn't any useful interface to autoconf, and it doesn't
have a comparable ability to figure out configuration details. The
path of least resistance would probably be something analogous to
config.h.in, a config.hs.in that allows autoconfig to account for all
the options and environmental variables.

Donn Cave, do**@drizzle.com
Jul 18 '05 #3
Quoth Isaac Jones <ij****@syntaxpolice.org>:
....
| One idea for this distribution system, which we're calling the Library
| Infrastructure Project, is to create a nice gmake-based build system,
| document it, and leave it at that.

If it can be plain make, instead of gmake, that would be closer
my idea of "nice". That has been one of Python's strengths since
early on, easy to build on a variety of platforms and doesn't
impose gratuitous requirements like needing GNU make or Perl
(can you imagine?)

| ... Another idea is to use a
| Haskell-based Distutils type system.
....

| What about configuration, do you typically interface with autoconf
| somehow, or does distutils have its own way to figure out
| configuration details?

This is not one of distutils' strengths. I think the answer to both
is "no" - there isn't any useful interface to autoconf, and it doesn't
have a comparable ability to figure out configuration details. The
path of least resistance would probably be something analogous to
config.h.in, a config.hs.in that allows autoconfig to account for all
the options and environmental variables.

Donn Cave, do**@drizzle.com
Jul 18 '05 #4

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

0
by: A.M. Kuchling | last post by:
I want to make a Distutils 1.1 release that wraps up the version of the code that was in Python 2.3. This would be the last 1.5.2-compatible release of Distutils, giving people the chance to use...
1
by: Mathieu Malaterre | last post by:
Hello, I thought this would be easy but I guess I didn't get the distutil feeling. I am trying to write a setup for install my package but I don't understand how to do that. organisation: ...
15
by: Colin J. Williams | last post by:
The distutils download page has: -------------------------------------------------------- Current stable release The current stable release is Distutils 1.0.2; you can download it as: *...
7
by: Frans Englich | last post by:
This is silly. How do I access data files I've installed with distutils? In a portable, generic way, I want to find out what is the following path on most systems: ...
0
by: Maarten Sneep | last post by:
I'm trying to build PyBison on Mac OS X, and I'm running into some problems with the distutils. Just for starters: PyBison requires Pyrex. This is not a problem, and Pyrex seems to work without...
1
by: George van den Driessche | last post by:
Hi folks, I'm looking at packaging a project I'm working on using distutils. The project is for Windows and contains a COM server which needs registration, so the installer needs to be a little...
10
by: Xah Lee | last post by:
A Haskell A Day: Manifesto This is my learning notes on Haskell. I call it a-Haskell-a-day. I've been programing since 1992, and am a top expert at the Mathematica↗ language. I've long wanted...
6
by: ajikoe | last post by:
Hello I tried to combine c++ and python together. So I follow from this website: http://kortis.to/radix/python_ext/ I have this code: # prmodule.c static PyObject *pr_isprime(PyObject *self,...
7
by: vedrandekovic | last post by:
Hello again, Is there any patch for python "distutils", for this ImportError: cannot import name log Regards, Vedran
0
by: newbie73 | last post by:
OS: Vista Python 2.5.2.2 (ActiveState Software Installation) Running latest Cygwin release The error generated is pasted below - please help. - Luis ***************************************
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
0
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.