I have created a web app that stores and displays all the messages from
my database maintenance jobs that run each night. The web app uses Java
servlets and has PostgreSQL 7.0 as the back end.
When the user requests the first page, he gets a list of all the servers
with maintenance records in the database, and a drop down list of all
the dates of maintenance records. If the user chooses a date first, then
the app uses a prepared statement with the date contained in a
parameter, and this executes very quickly - no problems.
However, if the web page user does not choose a date, then the app uses
a correlated sub-query to grab only the current (latest) day's
maintenance records. The query that is executed is:
select servername, databasename, message from messages o where
o.date_of_msg =
(select max(date_of_msg) from messages i where i.servername
= o.servername);
And this is a dog. It takes 15 - 20 minutes to execute the query (there
are about 200,000 rows in the table). I have an index on (servername,
date_of_msg), but it doesn't seem to be used in this query.
Is there a way to improve the performance on this query?
Thanks,
Steve Howard
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. 8 2039
Howard, Steven (US - Tulsa) wrote: select servername, databasename, message from messages o where o.date_of_msg = (select max(date_of_msg) from messages i where i.servername = o.servername);
And this is a dog. It takes 15 – 20 minutes to execute the query (there are about 200,000 rows in the table). I have an index on (servername, date_of_msg), but it doesn’t seem to be used in this query.
Just off the top of my head:
SELECT servername, databasename, message
FROM messages o
WHERE o.date_of_msg = (
SELECT date_of_msg
FROM messages i
WHERE i.servername = o.servername
ORDER BY date_of_msg
LIMIT 1
);
HTH,
Mike Mascari
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Howard, Steven (US - Tulsa) wrote: select servername, databasename, message from messages o where o.date_of_msg = (select max(date_of_msg) from messages i where i.servername = o.servername);
And this is a dog. It takes 15 – 20 minutes to execute the query (there are about 200,000 rows in the table). I have an index on (servername, date_of_msg), but it doesn’t seem to be used in this query.
Just off the top of my head:
SELECT servername, databasename, message
FROM messages o
WHERE o.date_of_msg = (
SELECT date_of_msg
FROM messages i
WHERE i.servername = o.servername
ORDER BY date_of_msg
LIMIT 1
);
HTH,
Mike Mascari
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Howard, Steven (US - Tulsa) wrote: I have created a web app that stores and displays all the messages from my database maintenance jobs that run each night. The web app uses Java servlets and has PostgreSQL 7.0 as the back end.
Step 1 is upgrade. ;)
However, if the web page user does not choose a date, then the app uses a correlated sub-query to grab only the current (latest) day's maintenance records. The query that is executed is:
select servername, databasename, message from messages o where o.date_of_msg =
(select max(date_of_msg) from messages i where i.servername = o.servername);
This is likely to be running the subquery once for each row in messages,
and probably not going to use an index in the inner either. The former
might be optimized by recent versions.
Changing the inner query to something like:
(select date_of_msg from messages i where i.servername=o.servername
order by date_of_msg desc limit 1)
or changing it to use a subselect in from (something like):
from messages o, (select servername, max(date_of_msg) from messages) i
where o.servername=i.servername
might both help, but I'm not sure either will work on 7.0.
And this is a dog. It takes 15 - 20 minutes to execute the query (there are about 200,000 rows in the table). I have an index on (servername, date_of_msg), but it doesn't seem to be used in this query.
You might wish to play around with changing the indexes and the order of
the columns in the multicolumn index as well.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Howard, Steven (US - Tulsa) wrote: I have created a web app that stores and displays all the messages from my database maintenance jobs that run each night. The web app uses Java servlets and has PostgreSQL 7.0 as the back end.
Step 1 is upgrade. ;)
However, if the web page user does not choose a date, then the app uses a correlated sub-query to grab only the current (latest) day's maintenance records. The query that is executed is:
select servername, databasename, message from messages o where o.date_of_msg =
(select max(date_of_msg) from messages i where i.servername = o.servername);
This is likely to be running the subquery once for each row in messages,
and probably not going to use an index in the inner either. The former
might be optimized by recent versions.
Changing the inner query to something like:
(select date_of_msg from messages i where i.servername=o.servername
order by date_of_msg desc limit 1)
or changing it to use a subselect in from (something like):
from messages o, (select servername, max(date_of_msg) from messages) i
where o.servername=i.servername
might both help, but I'm not sure either will work on 7.0.
And this is a dog. It takes 15 - 20 minutes to execute the query (there are about 200,000 rows in the table). I have an index on (servername, date_of_msg), but it doesn't seem to be used in this query.
You might wish to play around with changing the indexes and the order of
the columns in the multicolumn index as well.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On 29/04/2004 14:34 "Howard, Steven (US - Tulsa)" wrote: I have created a web app that stores and displays all the messages from my database maintenance jobs that run each night. The web app uses Java servlets and has PostgreSQL 7.0 as the back end.
7.0? That's positively ancient! When the user requests the first page, he gets a list of all the servers with maintenance records in the database, and a drop down list of all the dates of maintenance records. If the user chooses a date first, then the app uses a prepared statement with the date contained in a parameter, and this executes very quickly - no problems. However, if the web page user does not choose a date, then the app uses a correlated sub-query to grab only the current (latest) day's maintenance records. The query that is executed is:
select servername, databasename, message from messages o where o.date_of_msg =
(select max(date_of_msg) from messages i where i.servername = o.servername); And this is a dog. It takes 15 - 20 minutes to execute the query (there are about 200,000 rows in the table). I have an index on (servername, date_of_msg), but it doesn't seem to be used in this query.
PG doesn't use indexes for things like count(), max, min()...
You can avoid using max() by something like
select my_date from my_table order by my_date desc limit 1;
which will use the index. Is there a way to improve the performance on this query?
In addition to the above, I'd strongly recommend upgrading to 7.4 to take
advantage of the last ~4 years of continuous improvements.
--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for
Business |
| Computer Consultants | http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On 29/04/2004 14:34 "Howard, Steven (US - Tulsa)" wrote: I have created a web app that stores and displays all the messages from my database maintenance jobs that run each night. The web app uses Java servlets and has PostgreSQL 7.0 as the back end.
7.0? That's positively ancient! When the user requests the first page, he gets a list of all the servers with maintenance records in the database, and a drop down list of all the dates of maintenance records. If the user chooses a date first, then the app uses a prepared statement with the date contained in a parameter, and this executes very quickly - no problems. However, if the web page user does not choose a date, then the app uses a correlated sub-query to grab only the current (latest) day's maintenance records. The query that is executed is:
select servername, databasename, message from messages o where o.date_of_msg =
(select max(date_of_msg) from messages i where i.servername = o.servername); And this is a dog. It takes 15 - 20 minutes to execute the query (there are about 200,000 rows in the table). I have an index on (servername, date_of_msg), but it doesn't seem to be used in this query.
PG doesn't use indexes for things like count(), max, min()...
You can avoid using max() by something like
select my_date from my_table order by my_date desc limit 1;
which will use the index. Is there a way to improve the performance on this query?
In addition to the above, I'd strongly recommend upgrading to 7.4 to take
advantage of the last ~4 years of continuous improvements.
--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for
Business |
| Computer Consultants | http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Howard, Steven (US - Tulsa) wrote: I have created a web app that stores and displays all the messages from my database maintenance jobs that run each night. The web app uses Java servlets and has PostgreSQL 7.0 as the back end.
When the user requests the first page, he gets a list of all the servers with maintenance records in the database, and a drop down list of all the dates of maintenance records. If the user chooses a date first, then the app uses a prepared statement with the date contained in a parameter, and this executes very quickly – no problems.
However, if the web page user does not choose a date, then the app uses a correlated sub-query to grab only the current (latest) day’s maintenance records. The query that is executed is:
select servername, databasename, message from messages o where o.date_of_msg =
(select max(date_of_msg) from messages i where i.servername = o.servername);
And this is a dog. It takes 15 – 20 minutes to execute the query (there are about 200,000 rows in the table). I have an index on (servername, date_of_msg), but it doesn’t seem to be used in this query.
Few basic checks..
- What does explain analyze says for the slow query?
- Have you vacuumed and analyzed recently?
- Have you done basic optimisations from default state? Check http://www.varlena.com/varlena/Gener...bits/perf.html and http://www.varlena.com/varlena/Gener...ed_conf_e.html
And 7.0 is way too old. If you can afford to upgrade, upgrade to 7.4.2.
HTH
Shridhar
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Howard, Steven (US - Tulsa) wrote: I have created a web app that stores and displays all the messages from my database maintenance jobs that run each night. The web app uses Java servlets and has PostgreSQL 7.0 as the back end.
When the user requests the first page, he gets a list of all the servers with maintenance records in the database, and a drop down list of all the dates of maintenance records. If the user chooses a date first, then the app uses a prepared statement with the date contained in a parameter, and this executes very quickly – no problems.
However, if the web page user does not choose a date, then the app uses a correlated sub-query to grab only the current (latest) day’s maintenance records. The query that is executed is:
select servername, databasename, message from messages o where o.date_of_msg =
(select max(date_of_msg) from messages i where i.servername = o.servername);
And this is a dog. It takes 15 – 20 minutes to execute the query (there are about 200,000 rows in the table). I have an index on (servername, date_of_msg), but it doesn’t seem to be used in this query.
Few basic checks..
- What does explain analyze says for the slow query?
- Have you vacuumed and analyzed recently?
- Have you done basic optimisations from default state? Check http://www.varlena.com/varlena/Gener...bits/perf.html and http://www.varlena.com/varlena/Gener...ed_conf_e.html
And 7.0 is way too old. If you can afford to upgrade, upgrade to 7.4.2.
HTH
Shridhar
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: ajjvn |
last post by:
I 'inherited' a group of SQL Server server class machines. They are
true server technology but the disk sub-systems are lacking. There is
one hot-swap backplane that all the drives share (with...
|
by: rc |
last post by:
Hi
We have a SQL server on Win2k. the physical size of the db is about
40G and the main table has approx 65m rows in it. At the moment the
entire database is on one data file. The entire server...
|
by: Alex Callea |
last post by:
Hi there,
We have a web application handling thousands of requests per seconds reading
sql server data which is heavily updated.
We are generally experiencing no performance problems.
On some...
|
by: Kurt Schroeder |
last post by:
does compiling the code behind source using studio give and performance boost?
this is a rephrase of an a question i posted yesterday. To be honist VS.net
is becomming a pain to work with for...
|
by: James Radke |
last post by:
Hello,
I am creating an owner draw listbox for a windows application. It is all
working, except the performance is significantly slower than the standard
listbox. Basically what I have done is...
|
by: Jonesgj |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a test box which I would like to monitor CPU usage and run queue
during the day.
I don't want to buy any 3rd party tool, if I can do it easily, as I only
need to monitor the box's...
|
by: Tom Jastrzebski |
last post by:
Hello,
I was just testing VB.Net on Framework.Net 2.0 performance when I run into
the this problem.
This trivial code attached below executed hundreds, if not thousand times
faster in VB 6.0...
|
by: Alex Chudnovsky |
last post by:
I have come across with what appears to be a significant performance bug in
..NET 2.0 ArrayList.Sort method when compared with Array.Sort on the same
data. Same data on the same CPU gets sorted a...
|
by: muzu1232004 |
last post by:
Can anyone explain me when we use correlated subqueries rather than nested subqueries.
Do all the correlated subqueries can be written in nested subqueries form as well ?
What are the major...
|
by: Rafael Cunha de Almeida |
last post by:
Hi,
I've found several sites on google telling me that I shouldn't use
rand() % range+1
and I should, instead, use something like:
lowest+int(range*rand()/(RAND_MAX + 1.0))
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
| |