473,385 Members | 1,834 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,385 software developers and data experts.

Question

Hi,

I have question:

why such condition:
foofield not like '%bar%'

where foofield is varchar

returns false (or rather even ignore row) on record where foofield is null
but
returns true on records where foofield is '' (empty string)

regards
Robert
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Nov 12 '05 #1
10 1803
If you are experienced in Oracle, this might be confusing since Oracle
treats empty string and NULL as being the same.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Robert Partyka wrote:
why such condition:
foofield not like '%bar%'

where foofield is varchar

returns false (or rather even ignore row) on record where foofield is
null


Actually, it probably returns unknown(NULL) on such records.
NULL LIKE '%bar%' is unknown, so
NULL NOT LIKE '%bar%' is also unknown.

This is because NULL isn't the same as empty string, nor is it the
absence of a value, but it's an unknown value.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Nov 12 '05 #2
Robert Partyka wrote:
Hi,

I have question:

why such condition:
foofield not like '%bar%'

where foofield is varchar

returns false (or rather even ignore row) on record where foofield is null
but
returns true on records where foofield is '' (empty string)


SQL specifications.

Empty string and NULL are two different thinks.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

Nov 12 '05 #3
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Robert Partyka wrote:
why such condition:
foofield not like '%bar%'

where foofield is varchar

returns false (or rather even ignore row) on record where foofield is
null


Actually, it probably returns unknown(NULL) on such records.
NULL LIKE '%bar%' is unknown, so
NULL NOT LIKE '%bar%' is also unknown.

This is because NULL isn't the same as empty string, nor is it the absence
of a value, but it's an unknown value.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Nov 12 '05 #4
If you are experienced in Oracle, this might be confusing since Oracle
treats empty string and NULL as being the same.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Robert Partyka wrote:
why such condition:
foofield not like '%bar%'

where foofield is varchar

returns false (or rather even ignore row) on record where foofield is
null


Actually, it probably returns unknown(NULL) on such records.
NULL LIKE '%bar%' is unknown, so
NULL NOT LIKE '%bar%' is also unknown.

This is because NULL isn't the same as empty string, nor is it the
absence of a value, but it's an unknown value.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Nov 12 '05 #5
vh*****@inreach.com wrote:
If you are experienced in Oracle, this might be confusing since Oracle
treats empty string and NULL as being the same.


Really? I don't believe it.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

Nov 12 '05 #6
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
vh*****@inreach.com wrote:
If you are experienced in Oracle, this might be confusing since Oracle
treats empty string and NULL as being the same.

Really? I don't believe it.


It is insane, but true.

Mike Mascari
ma*****@mascari.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Nov 12 '05 #7
Mike Mascari <ma*****@mascari.com> writes:
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
vh*****@inreach.com wrote:
If you are experienced in Oracle, this might be confusing since Oracle
treats empty string and NULL as being the same.

Really? I don't believe it.


It is insane, but true.


Uh, yeah, but I think that results in the same behaviour for the case at hand.

ie on oracle this is still holds:

NULL LIKE '%foo%' => NULL

The idiocy is that Oracle does this:

'' LIKE '%foo%' => NULL

because it treats '' as if you had NULL, ie, equivalent to the example above.

--
greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Nov 12 '05 #8
vh*****@inreach.com wrote:
If you are experienced in Oracle, this might be confusing since Oracle
treats empty string and NULL as being the same.


Really? I don't believe it.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

Nov 12 '05 #9
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
vh*****@inreach.com wrote:
If you are experienced in Oracle, this might be confusing since Oracle
treats empty string and NULL as being the same.

Really? I don't believe it.


It is insane, but true.

Mike Mascari
ma*****@mascari.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Nov 12 '05 #10
Mike Mascari <ma*****@mascari.com> writes:
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
vh*****@inreach.com wrote:
If you are experienced in Oracle, this might be confusing since Oracle
treats empty string and NULL as being the same.

Really? I don't believe it.


It is insane, but true.


Uh, yeah, but I think that results in the same behaviour for the case at hand.

ie on oracle this is still holds:

NULL LIKE '%foo%' => NULL

The idiocy is that Oracle does this:

'' LIKE '%foo%' => NULL

because it treats '' as if you had NULL, ie, equivalent to the example above.

--
greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Nov 12 '05 #11

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

1
by: Mohammed Mazid | last post by:
Can anyone please help me on how to move to the next and previous question? Here is a snippet of my code: Private Sub cmdNext_Click() End Sub Private Sub cmdPrevious_Click() showrecord
3
by: Stevey | last post by:
I have the following XML file... <?xml version="1.0"?> <animals> <animal> <name>Tiger</name> <questions> <question index="0">true</question> <question index="1">true</question> </questions>
7
by: nospam | last post by:
Ok, 3rd or is it the 4th time I have asked this question on Partial Types, so, since it seems to me that Partial Types is still in the design or development stages at Microsoft, I am going to ask...
3
by: Ekqvist Marko | last post by:
Hi, I have one Access database table including questions and answers. Now I need to give answer id automatically to questionID column. But I don't know how it is best (fastest) to do? table...
10
by: glenn | last post by:
I am use to programming in php and the way session and post vars are past from fields on one page through to the post page automatically where I can get to their values easily to write to a...
10
by: Rider | last post by:
Hi, simple(?) question about asp.net configuration.. I've installed ASP.NET 2.0 QuickStart Sample successfully. But, When I'm first start application the follow message shown. ========= Server...
53
by: Jeff | last post by:
In the function below, can size ever be 0 (zero)? char *clc_strdup(const char * CLC_RESTRICT s) { size_t size; char *p; clc_assert_not_null(clc_strdup, s); size = strlen(s) + 1;
56
by: spibou | last post by:
In the statement "a *= expression" is expression assumed to be parenthesized ? For example if I write "a *= b+c" is this the same as "a = a * (b+c)" or "a = a * b+c" ?
2
by: Allan Ebdrup | last post by:
Hi, I'm trying to render a Matrix question in my ASP.Net 2.0 page, A matrix question is a question where you have several options that can all be rated according to several possible ratings (from...
3
by: Zhang Weiwu | last post by:
Hello! I wrote this: ..required-question p:after { content: "*"; } Corresponding HTML: <div class="required-question"><p>Question Text</p><input /></div> <div...
0
by: taylorcarr | last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.