473,889 Members | 1,352 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

How can I delete a primary or foreign key?

I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.1 (only through psql)
I know, that the command

ALTER TABLE OFFICES
DROP PRIMARY KEY (CITY);

and its foreign key equivalent:

ALTER TABLE SALESREPS
DROP CONSTRAINT
FOREIGN KEY (REP_OFFICE)
REFERENCES OFFICES;

don't work in PostgreSQL because they are not implemented. However, isn't
there another way of removing them?
I also tried to drop the index associated with the primary key, but it is not
permitted.

Anyone with any idea?
--
Tibor

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Nov 22 '05 #1
13 51667

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Tibor wrote:
I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.1 (only through psql)
I know, that the command

ALTER TABLE OFFICES
DROP PRIMARY KEY (CITY);

and its foreign key equivalent:

ALTER TABLE SALESREPS
DROP CONSTRAINT
FOREIGN KEY (REP_OFFICE)
REFERENCES OFFICES;

don't work in PostgreSQL because they are not implemented. However, isn't
there another way of removing them?


That's not the correct syntax for ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT.

ALTER TABLE tablename DROP CONSTRAINT constraint_name [RESTRICT | CASCADE]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Nov 22 '05 #2
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Tibor wrote:
I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.1 (only through psql)
I know, that the command

ALTER TABLE OFFICES
DROP PRIMARY KEY (CITY);

and its foreign key equivalent:

ALTER TABLE SALESREPS
DROP CONSTRAINT
FOREIGN KEY (REP_OFFICE)
REFERENCES OFFICES;

don't work in PostgreSQL because they are not implemented. However, isn't
there another way of removing them?
I also tried to drop the index associated with the primary key, but it is not
permitted.

Anyone with any idea?


It's an alter table:

alter table offices drop constraint constraint_name

where constraint name is usually tablename_pkey

assuming it was created the normal way, on a 7.4 box.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Nov 22 '05 #3
I forgot to mention that I have tried numerous variations.
The one quoted in the original mail was from "The Complete Reference" series.
I've also tried the one that the \h command suggests:

ALTER TABLE PARENTS DROP CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (TYPE) CASCADE;

but all I got was:

ERROR: syntax error at or near "foreign" at character 37

the DROP CONSTRAINT clause doesn't recognise either PRIMARY or FOREIGN KEY
option. (not implemented, I guess)

On Friday 20 Feb 2004 16:42, you wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Tibor wrote:
I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.1 (only through psql)
I know, that the command

ALTER TABLE OFFICES
DROP PRIMARY KEY (CITY);

and its foreign key equivalent:

ALTER TABLE SALESREPS
DROP CONSTRAINT
FOREIGN KEY (REP_OFFICE)
REFERENCES OFFICES;

don't work in PostgreSQL because they are not implemented. However, isn't
there another way of removing them?


That's not the correct syntax for ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT.

ALTER TABLE tablename DROP CONSTRAINT constraint_name [RESTRICT | CASCADE]


--
Tibor

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postg resql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Nov 22 '05 #4
tibor wrote:
I forgot to mention that I have tried numerous variations.
The one quoted in the original mail was from "The Complete Reference" series.
I've also tried the one that the \h command suggests:

ALTER TABLE PARENTS DROP CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (TYPE) CASCADE; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^

You are forgetting the name of the constraint.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


but all I got was:

ERROR: syntax error at or near "foreign" at character 37

the DROP CONSTRAINT clause doesn't recognise either PRIMARY or FOREIGN KEY
option. (not implemented, I guess)

On Friday 20 Feb 2004 16:42, you wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Tibor wrote:
I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.1 (only through psql)
I know, that the command

ALTER TABLE OFFICES
DROP PRIMARY KEY (CITY);

and its foreign key equivalent:

ALTER TABLE SALESREPS
DROP CONSTRAINT
FOREIGN KEY (REP_OFFICE)
REFERENCES OFFICES;

don't work in PostgreSQL because they are not implemented. However, isn't
there another way of removing them?


That's not the correct syntax for ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT.

ALTER TABLE tablename DROP CONSTRAINT constraint_name [RESTRICT | CASCADE]


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandpromp t.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Nov 22 '05 #5
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, tibor wrote:
I forgot to mention that I have tried numerous variations.
The one quoted in the original mail was from "The Complete Reference" series.
I've also tried the one that the \h command suggests:

ALTER TABLE PARENTS DROP CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (TYPE) CASCADE;


\h shows me
ALTER TABLE [ ONLY ] name [ * ]
DROP CONSTRAINT constraint_name [ RESTRICT | CASCADE ]

constraint_name isn't something like: FOREIGN KEY ...
it's the name given to the constraint (preferably at add time with the
CONSTRAINT constraint_name clause otherwise it's given an arbitrary name).

If you use \d tablename
You should see something like:
Foreign-key constraints:
"$1" FOREIGN KEY (b) REFERENCES a(a)

And the drop would look like
ALTER TABLE tablename DROP CONSTRAINT "$1";
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddres sHere" to ma*******@postg resql.org)

Nov 22 '05 #6
you are right. the correct version is:

ALTER TABLE name_of_table
DROP CONSTRAINT constraint_name [ RESTRICT | CASCADE ]

On Friday 20 Feb 2004 17:53, you wrote:
tibor wrote:
I forgot to mention that I have tried numerous variations.
The one quoted in the original mail was from "The Complete Reference"
series. I've also tried the one that the \h command suggests:

ALTER TABLE PARENTS DROP CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (TYPE) CASCADE;


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^

You are forgetting the name of the constraint.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
but all I got was:

ERROR: syntax error at or near "foreign" at character 37

the DROP CONSTRAINT clause doesn't recognise either PRIMARY or FOREIGN
KEY option. (not implemented, I guess)

On Friday 20 Feb 2004 16:42, you wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Tibor wrote:
I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.1 (only through psql)
I know, that the command

ALTER TABLE OFFICES
DROP PRIMARY KEY (CITY);

and its foreign key equivalent:

ALTER TABLE SALESREPS
DROP CONSTRAINT
FOREIGN KEY (REP_OFFICE)
REFERENCES OFFICES;

don't work in PostgreSQL because they are not implemented. However,
isn't there another way of removing them?

That's not the correct syntax for ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT.

ALTER TABLE tablename DROP CONSTRAINT constraint_name [RESTRICT |
CASCADE]


--
Tibor Harcsa

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

Nov 22 '05 #7
On Friday 20 February 2004 16:04, tibor wrote:
I forgot to mention that I have tried numerous variations.
The one quoted in the original mail was from "The Complete Reference"
Which book is this?

Look in the SQL Command reference - ALTER TALBLE
series. I've also tried the one that the \h command suggests:

ALTER TABLE PARENTS DROP CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (TYPE) CASCADE;


The \h says the same as the manuals:
ALTER TABLE [ ONLY ] table [ * ]
DROP CONSTRAINT constraint_name [ RESTRICT | CASCADE ]

If you have a table called "mytab" and a foreign-key constraint called
"myfkey" then you would use

ALTER TABLE mytab DROP CONSTRAINT myfkey;

If your constaint has a generated name like $1 then you'll want to quote it
"$1"
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postg resql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Nov 22 '05 #8
On Friday 20 Feb 2004 18:00, you wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, tibor wrote:
I forgot to mention that I have tried numerous variations.
The one quoted in the original mail was from "The Complete Reference"
series. I've also tried the one that the \h command suggests:

ALTER TABLE PARENTS DROP CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (TYPE) CASCADE;
\h shows me
ALTER TABLE [ ONLY ] name [ * ]
DROP CONSTRAINT constraint_name [ RESTRICT | CASCADE ]

constraint_name isn't something like: FOREIGN KEY ...
it's the name given to the constraint (preferably at add time with the
CONSTRAINT constraint_name clause otherwise it's given an arbitrary name).


You are perfectly right. I simply forgot to put in the name of the constraint.

If you use \d tablename
You should see something like:
Foreign-key constraints:
"$1" FOREIGN KEY (b) REFERENCES a(a)

And the drop would look like
ALTER TABLE tablename DROP CONSTRAINT "$1";


Thank you for your help and the info!

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postg resql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Nov 22 '05 #9
On Friday 20 Feb 2004 18:08, you wrote:
On Friday 20 February 2004 16:04, tibor wrote:
I forgot to mention that I have tried numerous variations.
The one quoted in the original mail was from "The Complete Reference"
Which book is this?

SQL: The Complete Reference, McGraw-Hill/Osborne, 2nd Edition, 2002
(James G. Groff and Paul N. Weinberg)


Look in the SQL Command reference - ALTER TABLE
series. I've also tried the one that the \h command suggests:

ALTER TABLE PARENTS DROP CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (TYPE) CASCADE;


The \h says the same as the manuals:
ALTER TABLE [ ONLY ] table [ * ]
DROP CONSTRAINT constraint_name [ RESTRICT | CASCADE ]

If you have a table called "mytab" and a foreign-key constraint called
"myfkey" then you would use

ALTER TABLE mytab DROP CONSTRAINT myfkey;

If your constaint has a generated name like $1 then you'll want to quote it
"$1"


Thanks.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Nov 22 '05 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
3923
by: geoff | last post by:
The table creation script(at the end of this post) works fine on 4.0.1-alpha-win, but the foreign key constraints fail on 4.0.15-win. I am starting the server with the same command for both versions: mysqld-max-nt --console --transaction-isolation=SERIALIZABLE In 4.0.15-win I can extract the following error after I run the table creation script: ERROR 1005: Can't create table '.\ibdata\#sql-a14_3.frm'
1
11495
by: Lannsjo | last post by:
I need to change my primary key column type from smallint to int. I have tried: ALTER TABLE livegroup MODIFY id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT; But get an error message certainly since my id-column is primary key and references other tables as well. How can I come around this problem? Need help /Martin
9
9589
by: Bob C. | last post by:
I want to create a 1-many relationship. Parent table has a primary key, child table has no primary key. The child table does have an index with all four fields of the parent's PK. How can I do this? Thanks, Bob C.
31
3402
by: Robert Brown | last post by:
Let's say I have a type hierarchy: (just an example) the general entity customer: CREATE TABLE customer(customer_id int, customer_name varchar(250), customer_type int) three specific customer subtypes: 1 - business, 2 - home, 3 - university
9
2404
by: Jax | last post by:
I'm making my first ever database for my program. I understand the concept of one to many relationships but fail to see the advantage of using a secondary key over a primary one. I have a lot of tables and link them together by one key the CaseKey. What is the disadvantages of this method? Why should I include more detailed item keys (e.g an arraylist of customer credit items would be stored in the CustomerCreditItem table surely it's...
6
3870
by: polocar | last post by:
Hi, I'm writing a program in Visual C# 2005 Professional Edition. This program connects to a SQL Server 2005 database called "Generations" (in which there is only one table, called "Generations"), and it allows the user to add, edit and delete the various records of the table. "Generations" table has the following fields: "IDPerson", NamePerson", "AgePerson" and "IDParent". A record contains the information about a person (his name, his...
5
2504
by: Bob Stearns | last post by:
For good and sufficient reasons I wish to insure that a primary key of table 1 is not a primary key of table 2. The following does not work: ALTER TABLE IS3.AUCTION_SUPER_CATEGORIES ADD CONSTRAINT code_not_fk check(code not in (select code from IS3.AUCTION_CATEGORIES where auction_id=auction_id)) Is there any way other than a trigger (or program checks) to write this?
4
2978
by: Wolfgang Keller | last post by:
Hello, so far it seems to me as if the only ORM module for Python which supports composite primary/foreign keys was SQLAlchemy. Which looks a little bit "overbloated" for my needs: I "just" need to be able to define a "logical model" (à la UML) in Python and have the ORM connect to a database (running on PostgreSQL in my case) which uses a corresponding (pre-defined) "physical model" as its schema. Modeling really does look exactly...
0
1039
by: Daniel Roy | last post by:
From Oracle: ORA-04091 table string.string is mutating, trigger/function may not see it Cause: A trigger (or a user defined PL/SQL function that is referenced in this statement) attempted to look at (or modify) a table that was in the middle of being modified by the statement which fired it. Action: Rewrite the trigger (or function) so it does not read that
2
5051
blyxx86
by: blyxx86 | last post by:
Good Afternoon Everyone, I am migrating from MS Access to MySQL (TONS faster, not to mention the usefulness of triggers). Well, I am running into problems with the way MS Access lets you design and the way MySQL designs tables. I test the joins and relationships with an ODBC Connection and linking the tables from within MS Access to my MySQL database. My question is within the PK-FK relationships. I usually would have one...
0
9961
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
9805
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
11188
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
1
10887
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
10439
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
0
9603
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
0
6025
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
2
4249
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
3
3253
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.