Session or browser problem??

[sw]

Hi all,

I have a news website tat is developed on joomla 1.5.Login facility is
done thru a login component.On each page,ther s a 'Log In' link that
redirects them to a login page.On successful login,user details are
set in session as well as cookies and then redirected back to d
referring page.The 'Log In' section changes to 'Welcome user',along
wid a 'Log Out' link.All this works d same in IE 6 as well as in FF
2.The difference comes durin log out action.

In FF,on clickin 'Log Out',the required session vars are set '' as
well as cookies in d component and then redirected back to referring
page.The login bar changes back to 'Log in'.But in IE,once redirected
from the component,the page still shows the login bar as 'Welcome
user'.Only if i manually click the refresh button (of IE), the page
gets refreshed and the login bar shows logged out status.

Any help wud be highly appreciated...

[JamesCX DiPietro]

That's not how the law sees it. You are very clearly threatening me. A death threat is a death threat, whether or not you add the world "please" to it or not. I suggest you cool down. You're obviously severly agitated.

--
JamesCX DiPietro (cdgzone at gmail.com)

Michael Fesser <ne*****@gmx.dewrote:

.oO(JamesCX DiPietro)

>>Making death threats on this or any other online forum is illegal.

It was a request, not a threat. Like the German "Geh sterben."
Quite common in discussions with peo^Wthings like you.

Micha

[Jackie Silva]

a signature is by definition personalized. you can put anything you want in
it. most people put their name.

if you're going to sign every post, at least use the standard sig
convention.

>>read it and weep:

http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2646.html

Section 4.3 is entirely about the sig delimiter, not its content.

>>lol.. what a maroon!

can't you fix your sig permanently? lol

Why should I fix something that I don't have at all? Or do you want me
to add a sig just for the sake of it? OK, here we go.

Micha

--

[Jackie Silva]

Fesser in any language means Arschloch. lol

"Michael Fesser" <ne*****@gmx.dewrote

It was a request, not a threat. Like the German "Geh sterben."
Quite common in discussions with peo^Wthings like you.

Micha

[JamesCX DiPietro]

Jerry Stuckle <js*******@attglobal.netwrote:

Yes, there is, and you have to look at each newsgroup. The standard in
this newsgroup is bottom or interwoven posting.

It's a matter of *group* preference, not *individual* preference.

But continue top posting - you won't get a lot of response.

And your comment added absolutely nothing to the conversation - except
to show you don't understand what you're doing.

I want to apologize to Jerry Stuckle (jstuckle), Michael Fesser
(netizen), Rik Wasmus (luiheidsgoeroe), Good Man (heyho), and
anyone else who may have read this thread and found what I posted
objectionable. It was not my intention to offend anyone, but I see
that my behavior was unacceptable, off-topic, and rude.

I was way out of line. The group's regulars are of course right,
and I Was wrong. The Usenet standard and this group's standard is
bottom-posting or interwoven posting. Top-posting is ill-advised
for reasons that have been stated.

I'm sorry for any inconvenience or offense this thread may
may have caused. Please disregard my previous posts.

--
JamesCX DiPietro (cdgzone at gmail.com)

[Shelly]

JamesCX DiPietro wrote:

Jerry Stuckle <js*******@attglobal.netwrote:

>Yes, there is, and you have to look at each newsgroup. The standard
in this newsgroup is bottom or interwoven posting.

It's a matter of *group* preference, not *individual* preference.

But continue top posting - you won't get a lot of response.

And your comment added absolutely nothing to the conversation -
except to show you don't understand what you're doing.

I want to apologize to Jerry Stuckle (jstuckle), Michael Fesser
(netizen), Rik Wasmus (luiheidsgoeroe), Good Man (heyho), and
anyone else who may have read this thread and found what I posted
objectionable. It was not my intention to offend anyone, but I see
that my behavior was unacceptable, off-topic, and rude.

I was way out of line. The group's regulars are of course right,
and I Was wrong. The Usenet standard and this group's standard is
bottom-posting or interwoven posting. Top-posting is ill-advised
for reasons that have been stated.

I'm sorry for any inconvenience or offense this thread may
may have caused. Please disregard my previous posts.

Wow! I have rarely seen an apology on the net, and certainly none so
abject. Kudos.

--
Shelly

[Jackie Silva]

"JamesCX DiPietro" <cd*****@gmail.comwrote in message
news:5o************@mid.individual.net...

Jerry Stuckle <js*******@attglobal.netwrote:

>Yes, there is, and you have to look at each newsgroup. The standard in
this newsgroup is bottom or interwoven posting.

I want to apologize to Jerry Stuckle (jstuckle), Michael Fesser
(netizen), Rik Wasmus (luiheidsgoeroe), Good Man (heyho), and
anyone else who may have read this thread and found what I posted
objectionable. It was not my intention to offend anyone, but I see
that my behavior was unacceptable, off-topic, and rude.

I was way out of line. The group's regulars are of course right,
and I Was wrong. The Usenet standard and this group's standard is
bottom-posting or interwoven posting. Top-posting is ill-advised
for reasons that have been stated.

I'm sorry for any inconvenience or offense this thread may
may have caused. Please disregard my previous posts.

me too... i'm sorry i was such a lame-ass troll. Jerry Stuckle, Michael
Fesser, AnrDaemon, and Jeff Gaines are all good folks. just ignore whatever
i said... i know how the correct way to post is now. i hope you guys can
forgive me for being such a lamer......

--
Jackie Silva