Hello,
I am using the <?php include() ?statement on my website for
organizational purposes. However, one of my includes contains some
PHP code. Is there any way for the server to actually parse the
include? I've tried this before, and it did not parse the include.
Rather, it included the file as just plain ASCII.
=======================
/*EXAMPLE 1*/
/*index.php*/
....
<?php include('global/includes/footer.inc') ?>
....
/*footer.inc*/
....
<p>© 1993-<?php echo date("Y") ?Kingswood School. All rights
reserved.</p>
....
/*EXAMPLE 2*/
/*index.php*/
....
<?php include('global/includes/lastmod.php') ?>
....
/*lastmod.php*/
....
<?php
echo "This file was last modified: ";
echo strftime("%A %B %d %Y");
include('whateverfilename.inc');
?>
=============================
I would like to be able to parse the include if it has php code, and
in some cases, create nesting includes (an include within an
include). Is this even possible? Any ideas?
Any help is certainly appreciated. Thanks!
Steven Borrelli
Web Developer
Kingswood School 18 2799
Steven Borrelli wrote:
Hello,
I am using the <?php include() ?statement on my website for
organizational purposes. However, one of my includes contains some
PHP code. Is there any way for the server to actually parse the
include? I've tried this before, and it did not parse the include.
Rather, it included the file as just plain ASCII.
If the main page is a php file, include will also make the included page to be
parsed by php.
I do suggest you use semicolon after each command, no matter if it's alone
between the php-tags or not.
It's always better to use .php as the file extension on the included files
too, this as .inc normally don't be set in the server to be parsed, which
leads to that if a person gives and url like http://example.net/footer.inc
they will see the full source, and if you happen to have your database
login/password stored in the file, then they will know how to access it.
If you don't already, it's quite good to run apache web server and avoid iss.
--
//Aho
In article <11**********************@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups .com>,
Steven Borrelli <sb********@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I am using the <?php include() ?statement on my website for
organizational purposes. However, one of my includes contains some
PHP code. Is there any way for the server to actually parse the
include? I've tried this before, and it did not parse the include.
Rather, it included the file as just plain ASCII.
=======================
/*EXAMPLE 1*/
/*index.php*/
...
<?php include('global/includes/footer.inc') ?>
...
/*footer.inc*/
...
<p>© 1993-<?php echo date("Y") ?Kingswood School. All rights
reserved.</p>
...
/*EXAMPLE 2*/
/*index.php*/
...
<?php include('global/includes/lastmod.php') ?>
...
/*lastmod.php*/
...
<?php
echo "This file was last modified: ";
echo strftime("%A %B %d %Y");
include('whateverfilename.inc');
?>
=============================
I would like to be able to parse the include if it has php code, and
in some cases, create nesting includes (an include within an
include). Is this even possible? Any ideas?
Any help is certainly appreciated. Thanks!
Steven Borrelli
Web Developer
Kingswood School
Should be parsed as long as the include file has the <? and ?tags.
Most of my includes are tagged .inc and it works fine.
Tim Streater wrote:
In article <11**********************@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups .com>,
Steven Borrelli <sb********@gmail.comwrote:
>Hello,
I am using the <?php include() ?statement on my website for organizational purposes. However, one of my includes contains some PHP code. Is there any way for the server to actually parse the include? I've tried this before, and it did not parse the include. Rather, it included the file as just plain ASCII. ======================= /*EXAMPLE 1*/ /*index.php*/ ... <?php include('global/includes/footer.inc') ?> ...
/*footer.inc*/ ... <p>© 1993-<?php echo date("Y") ?Kingswood School. All rights reserved.</p> ...
/*EXAMPLE 2*/ /*index.php*/ ... <?php include('global/includes/lastmod.php') ?> ...
/*lastmod.php*/ ... <?php echo "This file was last modified: "; echo strftime("%A %B %d %Y"); include('whateverfilename.inc'); ?>
=============================
I would like to be able to parse the include if it has php code, and in some cases, create nesting includes (an include within an include). Is this even possible? Any ideas?
Any help is certainly appreciated. Thanks!
Steven Borrelli Web Developer Kingswood School
Should be parsed as long as the include file has the <? and ?tags.
Most of my includes are tagged .inc and it works fine.
It depends completely on how your webserver is set up.
But .php files should be parsed by every webserver which has php installed.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp. js*******@attglobal.net
==================
On 20.06.2007 13:40 Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Tim Streater wrote:
>In article <11**********************@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups .com>, Steven Borrelli <sb********@gmail.comwrote:
>>Hello,
I am using the <?php include() ?statement on my website for organizational purposes. However, one of my includes contains some PHP code. Is there any way for the server to actually parse the include? I've tried this before, and it did not parse the include. Rather, it included the file as just plain ASCII. ======================= /*EXAMPLE 1*/ /*index.php*/ ... <?php include('global/includes/footer.inc') ?> ...
/*footer.inc*/ ... <p>© 1993-<?php echo date("Y") ?Kingswood School. All rights reserved.</p> ...
/*EXAMPLE 2*/ /*index.php*/ ... <?php include('global/includes/lastmod.php') ?> ...
/*lastmod.php*/ ... <?php echo "This file was last modified: "; echo strftime("%A %B %d %Y"); include('whateverfilename.inc'); ?>
=============================
I would like to be able to parse the include if it has php code, and in some cases, create nesting includes (an include within an include). Is this even possible? Any ideas?
Any help is certainly appreciated. Thanks!
Steven Borrelli Web Developer Kingswood School
Should be parsed as long as the include file has the <? and ?tags. Most of my includes are tagged .inc and it works fine.
It depends completely on how your webserver is set up.
But .php files should be parsed by every webserver which has php installed.
You're confusing php include() and server-side includes or whatever. php
include() doesn't involve the web server (unless you're including a http
url).
--
gosha bine
extended php parser ~ http://code.google.com/p/pihipi
blok ~ http://www.tagarga.com/blok
On 20.06.2007 05:16 Steven Borrelli wrote:
Hello,
I am using the <?php include() ?statement on my website for
organizational purposes. However, one of my includes contains some
PHP code. Is there any way for the server to actually parse the
include? I've tried this before, and it did not parse the include.
Rather, it included the file as just plain ASCII.
=======================
/*EXAMPLE 1*/
/*index.php*/
...
<?php include('global/includes/footer.inc') ?>
...
/*footer.inc*/
...
<p>© 1993-<?php echo date("Y") ?Kingswood School. All rights
reserved.</p>
...
/*EXAMPLE 2*/
/*index.php*/
...
<?php include('global/includes/lastmod.php') ?>
...
/*lastmod.php*/
...
<?php
echo "This file was last modified: ";
echo strftime("%A %B %d %Y");
include('whateverfilename.inc');
?>
=============================
I would like to be able to parse the include if it has php code, and
in some cases, create nesting includes (an include within an
include). Is this even possible? Any ideas?
Any help is certainly appreciated. Thanks!
Steven Borrelli
Web Developer
Kingswood School
Actually, includes are always parsed and your code should work
perfectly. Double-check your configuration.
--
gosha bine
extended php parser ~ http://code.google.com/p/pihipi
blok ~ http://www.tagarga.com/blok
gosha bine wrote:
On 20.06.2007 13:40 Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>Tim Streater wrote:
>>In article <11**********************@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups .com>, Steven Borrelli <sb********@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I am using the <?php include() ?statement on my website for organizational purposes. However, one of my includes contains some PHP code. Is there any way for the server to actually parse the include? I've tried this before, and it did not parse the include. Rather, it included the file as just plain ASCII. ======================= /*EXAMPLE 1*/ /*index.php*/ ... <?php include('global/includes/footer.inc') ?> ...
/*footer.inc*/ ... <p>© 1993-<?php echo date("Y") ?Kingswood School. All rights reserved.</p> ...
/*EXAMPLE 2*/ /*index.php*/ ... <?php include('global/includes/lastmod.php') ?> ...
/*lastmod.php*/ ... <?php echo "This file was last modified: "; echo strftime("%A %B %d %Y"); include('whateverfilename.inc'); ?>
=============================
I would like to be able to parse the include if it has php code, and in some cases, create nesting includes (an include within an include). Is this even possible? Any ideas?
Any help is certainly appreciated. Thanks!
Steven Borrelli Web Developer Kingswood School
Should be parsed as long as the include file has the <? and ?tags. Most of my includes are tagged .inc and it works fine.
It depends completely on how your webserver is set up.
But .php files should be parsed by every webserver which has php installed.
You're confusing php include() and server-side includes or whatever. php
include() doesn't involve the web server (unless you're including a http
url).
No, I'm not.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp. js*******@attglobal.net
==================
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
It depends completely on how your webserver is set up.
But .php files should be parsed by every webserver which has php installed.
All files included with include(), require(), include_once() and
require_once() are parsed as PHP files. This is not dependent on
the filename or web server.
--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
[Geek of HTML/SQL/Perl/PHP/Python/Apache/Linux]
[OS: Linux 2.6.12-12mdksmp, up 10:37.]
dict, thes & ency http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2007/0...ict-thes-ency/
Toby A Inkster wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>It depends completely on how your webserver is set up.
But .php files should be parsed by every webserver which has php installed.
All files included with include(), require(), include_once() and
require_once() are parsed as PHP files. This is not dependent on
the filename or web server.
Toby,
Interesting, because I've seen this before, and others have commented on
it, also. Maybe it was a bug in an older version of PHP - it's been a
while ago. But I had one local cohort who was using php includes (not
SSI), and his files were not being parsed when they had .inc extensions.
Changing them to .php worked. And no, I'm sure he didn't use SSI.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp. js*******@attglobal.net
==================
..oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>Interesting, because I've seen this before, and others have commented on it, also. Maybe it was a bug in an older version of PHP - it's been a while ago. But I had one local cohort who was using php includes (not SSI), and his files were not being parsed when they had .inc extensions.
Either a bug or something heavily wrong on the server. As mentioned in
another post -- PHP includes have _nothing_ to do with the web server,
they are entirely handled by the interpreter. Since you explicitly write
their name in the include statement, you can call them whatever you
like:
require_once 'foo.bar';
require_once '42';
require_once '.o0o.';
All valid.
Micha
On 20 Jun, 12:40, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.netwrote:
Tim Streater wrote:
In article <1182309379.784775.138...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups .com>,
Steven Borrelli <sborrel...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I am using the <?php include() ?statement on my website for
organizational purposes. However, one of my includes contains some
PHP code. Is there any way for the server to actually parse the
include? I've tried this before, and it did not parse the include.
Rather, it included the file as just plain ASCII.
=======================
/*EXAMPLE 1*/
/*index.php*/
...
<?php include('global/includes/footer.inc') ?>
...
/*footer.inc*/
...
<p>© 1993-<?php echo date("Y") ?Kingswood School. All rights
reserved.</p>
...
/*EXAMPLE 2*/
/*index.php*/
...
<?php include('global/includes/lastmod.php') ?>
...
/*lastmod.php*/
...
<?php
echo "This file was last modified: ";
echo strftime("%A %B %d %Y");
include('whateverfilename.inc');
?>
=============================
I would like to be able to parse the include if it has php code, and
in some cases, create nesting includes (an include within an
include). Is this even possible? Any ideas?
Any help is certainly appreciated. Thanks!
Steven Borrelli
Web Developer
Kingswood School
Should be parsed as long as the include file has the <? and ?tags.
Most of my includes are tagged .inc and it works fine.
It depends completely on how your webserver is set up.
Not for an includED file - the web server has no visibility of it.
C.
C. wrote:
On 20 Jun, 12:40, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.netwrote:
>Tim Streater wrote:
>>In article <1182309379.784775.138...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups .com>, Steven Borrelli <sborrel...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I am using the <?php include() ?statement on my website for organizational purposes. However, one of my includes contains some PHP code. Is there any way for the server to actually parse the include? I've tried this before, and it did not parse the include. Rather, it included the file as just plain ASCII. ======================= /*EXAMPLE 1*/ /*index.php*/ ... <?php include('global/includes/footer.inc') ?> ... /*footer.inc*/ ... <p>© 1993-<?php echo date("Y") ?Kingswood School. All rights reserved.</p> ... /*EXAMPLE 2*/ /*index.php*/ ... <?php include('global/includes/lastmod.php') ?> ... /*lastmod.php*/ ... <?php echo "This file was last modified: "; echo strftime("%A %B %d %Y"); include('whateverfilename.inc'); ?> ============================= I would like to be able to parse the include if it has php code, and in some cases, create nesting includes (an include within an include). Is this even possible? Any ideas? Any help is certainly appreciated. Thanks! Steven Borrelli Web Developer Kingswood School Should be parsed as long as the include file has the <? and ?tags. Most of my includes are tagged .inc and it works fine.
It depends completely on how your webserver is set up.
Not for an includED file - the web server has no visibility of it.
It's true, the file extension don't matter when you include files in a php
file, but by default a *.inc file won't be parsed if it's directly accessed
example: http://www.example.net/myincludefile.inc
This can be a security issue if you store database login/passwords in a *.inc
file, which you should avoid to use any other extention than *.php, which will
be parsed on a php enabled server.
--
//Aho
..oO(J.O. Aho)
>It's true, the file extension don't matter when you include files in a php file, but by default a *.inc file won't be parsed if it's directly accessed
example: http://www.example.net/myincludefile.inc
This can be a security issue if you store database login/passwords in a *.inc file, which you should avoid to use any other extention than *.php, which will be parsed on a php enabled server.
Of course these files should be stored outside the document root.
Even a .php extension is no guarantee that no visitors will ever be able
to view that file. A server update, a misconfiguration, whatever --
there are some situations where even a .php file could be delivered
unparsed.
Micha
On Jun 21, 8:31 am, Michael Fesser <neti...@gmx.dewrote:
.oO(Jerry Stuckle)
Interesting, because I've seen this before, and others have commented on
it, also. Maybe it was a bug in an older version of PHP - it's been a
while ago. But I had one local cohort who was using php includes (not
SSI), and his files were not being parsed when they had .inc extensions.
Either a bug or something heavily wrong on the server. As mentioned in
another post -- PHP includes have _nothing_ to do with the web server,
they are entirely handled by the interpreter. Since you explicitly write
their name in the include statement, you can call them whatever you
like:
require_once 'foo.bar';
require_once '42';
require_once '.o0o.';
All valid.
Micha
When you say the PHP includes have nothing to do with the web server,
that is somewhat confusing.
If I have my index.php, and I have a call to a php include within
that, and also another php include within the first include, and all
the includes have the .php file extension, will everything be parsed
and appear like it's supposed to? And it won't work if the file
extension is different?
In other words, is it possible to make nesting php includes?
Steven
Steven Borrelli wrote:
When you say the PHP includes have nothing to do with the web server,
that is somewhat confusing.
The web server won't load the included files, it won't have a clue what has
been included, as this is handled by the PHP parser module.
If I have my index.php, and I have a call to a php include within
that, and also another php include within the first include, and all
the includes have the .php file extension, will everything be parsed
and appear like it's supposed to?
The extension has nothing to do with if the file will be parsed or not, but of
"security" reasons it's vise to set the php extension to the include files too.
When you include a php script, see to that the PHP code in that file has the
'<?PHP' and '?>' tags, or else the php code will be treated as plain text.
example:
--- file1.inc.php ---
<?PHP
echo "Hello";
?>
--- eof ---
--- file2.inc.php ---
echo "Hello";
--- eof ---
--- index.php ---
<html><head><title>php include test</title></head><body>
First include: <?PHP include 'file1.inc.php'; ?><br>
Second include: <?PHP include 'file2.inc.php'; ?><br>
</body></html>
--- eof ---
If you run this small example you will notice that the output will look like this:
First include: Hello
Second include: echo "Hello";
In other words, is it possible to make nesting php includes?
Sure you can, there is no problems with that at all and it's justed quite a
lot on the most big projects you can find (see freshmeat.net).
--
//Aho
you can even leave off the ?in the include file if you like - as
long as you have the <? at the start
On Jun 22, 10:18 am, "J.O. Aho" <u...@example.netwrote:
Steven Borrelli wrote:
When you say the PHP includes have nothing to do with the web server,
that is somewhat confusing.
The web server won't load the included files, it won't have a clue what has
been included, as this is handled by the PHP parser module.
If I have my index.php, and I have a call to a php include within
that, and also another php include within the first include, and all
the includes have the .php file extension, will everything be parsed
and appear like it's supposed to?
The extension has nothing to do with if the file will be parsed or not, but of
"security" reasons it's vise to set the php extension to the include files too.
When you include a php script, see to that the PHP code in that file has the
'<?PHP' and '?>' tags, or else the php code will be treated as plain text.
example:
--- file1.inc.php ---
<?PHP
echo "Hello";
?>
--- eof ---
--- file2.inc.php ---
echo "Hello";
--- eof ---
--- index.php ---
<html><head><title>php include test</title></head><body>
First include: <?PHP include 'file1.inc.php'; ?><br>
Second include: <?PHP include 'file2.inc.php'; ?><br>
</body></html>
--- eof ---
If you run this small example you will notice that the output will look like this:
First include: Hello
Second include: echo "Hello";
In other words, is it possible to make nesting php includes?
Sure you can, there is no problems with that at all and it's justed quite a
lot on the most big projects you can find (see freshmeat.net).
--
//Aho
That makes sense now. Thanks so much Aho, ... and everyone else too!
Steven
On Jun 23, 4:46 am, macca <ptmcna...@googlemail.comwrote:
you can even leave off the ?in the include file if you like - as
long as you have the <? at the start
You can leave it out in any php-file, whether it is included or not.
As long as there isn't any output after that. However, I would not
recommend this, as it can be considered as sloppy coding practise.
--
Jussi
Guy calls a government office, and proclaims "I want to be instated as
the president!" He gets the reply "Are you an idiot, or just mentally
ill?" The guy goes "Yes, yes! And I'm old, too!"
disczero.com
naamio.net
hoffburger.com
..oO(J.O. Aho)
>Steven Borrelli wrote:
>When you say the PHP includes have nothing to do with the web server, that is somewhat confusing.
The web server won't load the included files, it won't have a clue what has been included, as this is handled by the PHP parser module.
Yep. You can even use includes in command line scripts (PHP-CLI), where
absolutely no webserver is involved. It's always a direct file access,
done by the PHP interpreter itself.
>If I have my index.php, and I have a call to a php include within that, and also another php include within the first include, and all the includes have the .php file extension, will everything be parsed and appear like it's supposed to?
The extension has nothing to do with if the file will be parsed or not, but of "security" reasons it's vise to set the php extension to the include files too.
Depends on where the files are stored. It's much more secure to put
include files _outside_ of the webserver's document root, so they can't
be accessed by a URL at all.
Micha This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Ot |
last post by:
I have an xml document similar to this
<all>
<one>
<options attr1="1" attr2="2" />
<item name="a name" attr1="1" />
<item name="another" attr1="2"/>
</one>
<two>
<options attr1="1"...
|
by: Michael Riggio |
last post by:
Has anyone tried to utilize this class? Unfortunately, the MSDN
documentation is pretty weak for this class and the examples they provide
are pretty lame.
I created a class that derives from...
|
by: Martin Larsen |
last post by:
Hi,
When a PHP program links to a library using include or require (or their
_once variations), is the library then linked dynamically or statically?
While it might seem irrelevant from a...
|
by: KeithEalanta |
last post by:
Hi all,
Ive been struggling with a problem for a little, and I can't seem to find any info on it.
I am loading an XML file into the browser and that file references an XSLT file as it's default...
|
by: taylorcarr |
last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
|
by: aa123db |
last post by:
Variable and constants
Use var or let for variables and const fror constants.
Var foo ='bar';
Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar';
Functions
function $name$ ($parameters$) {
}
...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
| |