Can some one explain if this can be fixed using php.ini settings ?
echo "round 20.545 ".round(20.545,2)."<br>";
echo "round 20.555 ".round(20.555,2)."<br>";
echo "number_format 20.545 ".number_format(20.545, 2, ',',
'.')."<br>";
echo "number_format 20.555 ".number_format(20.555, 2, ',',
'.')."<br>";
PHP Version 4.3.0 / FreeBSD
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.56
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,55
PHP Version 4.4.4 / CENTOS
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.55
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,55
PHP Version 5.1.4 / Windows NT
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.56
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,56
I know that the round always goes for the odd but this is not
consistence with the SO running PHP
Thanks 7 4191
<kk*****@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@42g2000cwt.googlegro ups.com...
Can some one explain if this can be fixed using php.ini settings ?
echo "round 20.545 ".round(20.545,2)."<br>";
echo "round 20.555 ".round(20.555,2)."<br>";
echo "number_format 20.545 ".number_format(20.545, 2, ',',
'.')."<br>";
echo "number_format 20.555 ".number_format(20.555, 2, ',',
'.')."<br>";
PHP Version 4.3.0 / FreeBSD
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.56
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,55
PHP Version 4.4.4 / CENTOS
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.55
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,55
PHP Version 5.1.4 / Windows NT
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.56
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,56
My only observation about the examples you chose is that the fractional
parts are infinitely repeating "radiximals" in binary.
0.545 = 545/1000 = 109/200 (irreducible)
0.555 = 555/1000 = 111/200 (irreducible)
Both of the numbers above can't be expressed as precise binary floating
point numbers because the denominator after reduction has prime factors that
are not "2".
PHP.INI may be a factor, but it may also be that something at a lower level
is occurring (i.e. machine arithmetic, how certain rounding settings on
floatingpoint processors or libraries are set).
In other words, you've chosen antagonistic examples.
Why don't you try 7/8 (0.875), 15/16 (0.9275), or 31/32 (0.96875) as the
fractional part of the numbers and see if you can get the same behavior.
I'm guessing that you may not.
Any fraction with a reasonable denomiator (< 2^16) that is a power of 2
would be a reasonable test case.
Note that these are all exactly representable by a typical machine.
Just a guess.
I've tested the same function in the same hardware configuration and
the only difference is the OS, so it must be the libraries the big
problem is that i don't know witch ones to replace in order to get the
system to solve the way i want.
On Dec 22, 4:42 pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@e3ft.comwrote:
<kkmi...@gmail.comwrote in messagenews:11**********************@42g2000cwt.go oglegroups.com...
Can some one explain if this can be fixed using php.ini settings ?
echo "round 20.545 ".round(20.545,2)."<br>";
echo "round 20.555 ".round(20.555,2)."<br>";
echo "number_format 20.545 ".number_format(20.545, 2, ',',
'.')."<br>";
echo "number_format 20.555 ".number_format(20.555, 2, ',',
'.')."<br>";
PHP Version 4.3.0 / FreeBSD
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.56
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,55
PHP Version 4.4.4 / CENTOS
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.55
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,55
PHP Version 5.1.4 / Windows NT
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.56
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,56My only observation about the examples you chose is that the fractional
parts are infinitely repeating "radiximals" in binary.
0.545 = 545/1000 = 109/200 (irreducible)
0.555 = 555/1000 = 111/200 (irreducible)
Both of the numbers above can't be expressed as precise binary floating
point numbers because the denominator after reduction has prime factors that
are not "2".
PHP.INI may be a factor, but it may also be that something at a lower level
is occurring (i.e. machine arithmetic, how certain rounding settings on
floatingpoint processors or libraries are set).
In other words, you've chosen antagonistic examples.
Why don't you try 7/8 (0.875), 15/16 (0.9275), or 31/32 (0.96875) as the
fractional part of the numbers and see if you can get the same behavior.
I'm guessing that you may not.
Any fraction with a reasonable denomiator (< 2^16) that is a power of 2
would be a reasonable test case.
Note that these are all exactly representable by a typical machine.
Just a guess.
PHP code
echo "round(10.045,2)  ".round(10.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(20.045,2)  ".round(20.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(30.045,2)  ".round(30.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(40.045,2)  ".round(40.045,2)."<br />";
This is very strange:
round(10.045,2)  10.04
round(20.045,2)  20.05
round(30.045,2)  30.05
round(40.045,2)  40.05
On Dec 26, 11:57 am, "kkmi...@gmail.com" <kkmi...@gmail.comwrote:
I've tested the same function in the same hardware configuration and
the only difference is the OS, so it must be the libraries the big
problem is that i don't know witch ones to replace in order to get the
system to solve the way i want.
On Dec 22, 4:42 pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@e3ft.comwrote:
<kkmi...@gmail.comwrote in messagenews:11**********************@42g2000cwt.go oglegroups.com...
Can some one explain if this can be fixed using php.ini settings ?
echo "round 20.545 ".round(20.545,2)."<br>";
echo "round 20.555 ".round(20.555,2)."<br>";
echo "number_format 20.545 ".number_format(20.545, 2, ',',
'.')."<br>";
echo "number_format 20.555 ".number_format(20.555, 2, ',',
'.')."<br>";
PHP Version 4.3.0 / FreeBSD
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.56
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,55
PHP Version 4.4.4 / CENTOS
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.55
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,55
PHP Version 5.1.4 / Windows NT
round 20.545 20.55
round 20.555 20.56
number_format 20.545 20,55
number_format 20.555 20,56My only observation about the examples you chose is that the fractional
parts are infinitely repeating "radiximals" in binary.
0.545 = 545/1000 = 109/200 (irreducible)
0.555 = 555/1000 = 111/200 (irreducible)
Both of the numbers above can't be expressed as precise binary floating
point numbers because the denominator after reduction has prime factors that
are not "2".
PHP.INI may be a factor, but it may also be that something at a lower level
is occurring (i.e. machine arithmetic, how certain rounding settings on
floatingpoint processors or libraries are set).
In other words, you've chosen antagonistic examples.
Why don't you try 7/8 (0.875), 15/16 (0.9275), or 31/32 (0.96875) as the
fractional part of the numbers and see if you can get the same behavior.
I'm guessing that you may not.
Any fraction with a reasonable denomiator (< 2^16) that is a power of 2
would be a reasonable test case.
Note that these are all exactly representable by a typical machine.
Just a guess.
kk*****@gmail.com wrote:
PHP code
echo "round(10.045,2)  ".round(10.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(20.045,2)  ".round(20.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(30.045,2)  ".round(30.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(40.045,2)  ".round(40.045,2)."<br />";
This is very strange:
round(10.045,2)  10.04
round(20.045,2)  20.05
round(30.045,2)  30.05
round(40.045,2)  40.05
On Dec 26, 11:57 am, "kkmi...@gmail.com" <kkmi...@gmail.comwrote:
>>I've tested the same function in the same hardware configuration and the only difference is the OS, so it must be the libraries the big problem is that i don't know witch ones to replace in order to get the system to solve the way i want.
On Dec 22, 4:42 pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@e3ft.comwrote:
>>><kkmi...@gmail.comwrote in messagenews:11**********************@42g2000cwt.go oglegroups.com...
>>>>Can some one explain if this can be fixed using php.ini settings ?
>>>>echo "round 20.545 ".round(20.545,2)."<br>"; echo "round 20.555 ".round(20.555,2)."<br>"; echo "number_format 20.545 ".number_format(20.545, 2, ',', '.')."<br>"; echo "number_format 20.555 ".number_format(20.555, 2, ',', '.')."<br>";
>>>>PHP Version 4.3.0 / FreeBSD round 20.545 20.55 round 20.555 20.56 number_format 20.545 20,55 number_format 20.555 20,55
>>>>PHP Version 4.4.4 / CENTOS round 20.545 20.55 round 20.555 20.55 number_format 20.545 20,55 number_format 20.555 20,55
>>>>PHP Version 5.1.4 / Windows NT round 20.545 20.55 round 20.555 20.56 number_format 20.545 20,55 number_format 20.555 20,56My only observation about the examples you chose is that the fractional
parts are infinitely repeating "radiximals" in binary.
>>>0.545 = 545/1000 = 109/200 (irreducible) 0.555 = 555/1000 = 111/200 (irreducible)
>>>Both of the numbers above can't be expressed as precise binary floating point numbers because the denominator after reduction has prime factors that are not "2".
>>>PHP.INI may be a factor, but it may also be that something at a lower level is occurring (i.e. machine arithmetic, how certain rounding settings on floatingpoint processors or libraries are set).
>>>In other words, you've chosen antagonistic examples.
>>>Why don't you try 7/8 (0.875), 15/16 (0.9275), or 31/32 (0.96875) as the fractional part of the numbers and see if you can get the same behavior. I'm guessing that you may not.
>>>Any fraction with a reasonable denomiator (< 2^16) that is a power of 2 would be a reasonable test case.
>>>Note that these are all exactly representable by a typical machine.
>>>Just a guess.
This is the exact same problem you reported in comp.databases.mysql, and
the solution is exactly the same.

==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp. js*******@attglobal.net
==================
Has i told you on the other newsgroup
This 2 servers have the same hardware configuration
On Windows 2003 http://efeito.org/info.php
On Linux http://efeito.net/info.php
On Dec 27, 12:54 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.netwrote:
kkmi...@gmail.com wrote:
PHP code
echo "round(10.045,2)  ".round(10.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(20.045,2)  ".round(20.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(30.045,2)  ".round(30.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(40.045,2)  ".round(40.045,2)."<br />";
This is very strange:
round(10.045,2)  10.04
round(20.045,2)  20.05
round(30.045,2)  30.05
round(40.045,2)  40.05
On Dec 26, 11:57 am, "kkmi...@gmail.com" <kkmi...@gmail.comwrote:
>I've tested the same function in the same hardware configuration and the only difference is the OS, so it must be the libraries the big problem is that i don't know witch ones to replace in order to get the system to solve the way i want.
>On Dec 22, 4:42 pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@e3ft.comwrote:
>><kkmi...@gmail.comwrote in messagenews:11**********************@42g2000cwt.go oglegroups.com...
>>>Can some one explain if this can be fixed using php.ini settings ?
>>>echo "round 20.545 ".round(20.545,2)."<br>"; echo "round 20.555 ".round(20.555,2)."<br>"; echo "number_format 20.545 ".number_format(20.545, 2, ',', '.')."<br>"; echo "number_format 20.555 ".number_format(20.555, 2, ',', '.')."<br>";
>>>PHP Version 4.3.0 / FreeBSD round 20.545 20.55 round 20.555 20.56 number_format 20.545 20,55 number_format 20.555 20,55
>>>PHP Version 4.4.4 / CENTOS round 20.545 20.55 round 20.555 20.55 number_format 20.545 20,55 number_format 20.555 20,55
>>>PHP Version 5.1.4 / Windows NT round 20.545 20.55 round 20.555 20.56 number_format 20.545 20,55 number_format 20.555 20,56My only observation about the examples you chose is that the fractional
>>parts are infinitely repeating "radiximals" in binary.
>>0.545 = 545/1000 = 109/200 (irreducible) 0.555 = 555/1000 = 111/200 (irreducible)
>>Both of the numbers above can't be expressed as precise binary floating point numbers because the denominator after reduction has prime factors that are not "2".
>>PHP.INI may be a factor, but it may also be that something at a lower level is occurring (i.e. machine arithmetic, how certain rounding settings on floatingpoint processors or libraries are set).
>>In other words, you've chosen antagonistic examples.
>>Why don't you try 7/8 (0.875), 15/16 (0.9275), or 31/32 (0.96875) as the fractional part of the numbers and see if you can get the same behavior. I'm guessing that you may not.
>>Any fraction with a reasonable denomiator (< 2^16) that is a power of 2 would be a reasonable test case.
>>Note that these are all exactly representable by a typical machine.
>>Just a guess.This is the exact same problem you reported in comp.databases.mysql, and
the solution is exactly the same.

==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstuck...@attglobal.net
==================
<kk*****@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@73g2000cwn.googlegrou ps.com...
PHP code
echo "round(10.045,2)  ".round(10.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(20.045,2)  ".round(20.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(30.045,2)  ".round(30.045,2)."<br />";
echo "round(40.045,2)  ".round(40.045,2)."<br />";
This is very strange:
round(10.045,2)  10.04
round(20.045,2)  20.05
round(30.045,2)  30.05
round(40.045,2)  40.05
Why are you posting this code and quoting my post?
..045 = 45/1000 = 9/200 = denominator not a power of 2.
Like your earlier examples, these numbers are not exactly expressable as
base2 decimals.
It would be interesting to determine the breakpoint between
round(10.045,2)  10.04
round(20.045,2)  20.05
where the rounding changes. I'm going to guess that 15.045 is one way and
16.045 is the other.
Dav.e kk*****@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:54 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.netwrote:
>>kkmi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>PHP code echo "round(10.045,2)  ".round(10.045,2)."<br />"; echo "round(20.045,2)  ".round(20.045,2)."<br />"; echo "round(30.045,2)  ".round(30.045,2)."<br />"; echo "round(40.045,2)  ".round(40.045,2)."<br />";
>>>This is very strange:
>>>round(10.045,2)  10.04 round(20.045,2)  20.05 round(30.045,2)  30.05 round(40.045,2)  40.05
>>>On Dec 26, 11:57 am, "kkmi...@gmail.com" <kkmi...@gmail.comwrote:
>>>>I've tested the same function in the same hardware configuration and the only difference is the OS, so it must be the libraries the big problem is that i don't know witch ones to replace in order to get the system to solve the way i want.
>>>>On Dec 22, 4:42 pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@e3ft.comwrote:
>>>>><kkmi...@gmail.comwrote in messagenews:11**********************@42g2000cwt.go oglegroups.com...
>>>>>>Can some one explain if this can be fixed using php.ini settings ?
>>>>>>echo "round 20.545 ".round(20.545,2)."<br>"; >>echo "round 20.555 ".round(20.555,2)."<br>"; >>echo "number_format 20.545 ".number_format(20.545, 2, ',', >>'.')."<br>"; >>echo "number_format 20.555 ".number_format(20.555, 2, ',', >>'.')."<br>";
>>>>>>PHP Version 4.3.0 / FreeBSD >>round 20.545 20.55 >>round 20.555 20.56 >>number_format 20.545 20,55 >>number_format 20.555 20,55
>>>>>>PHP Version 4.4.4 / CENTOS >>round 20.545 20.55 >>round 20.555 20.55 >>number_format 20.545 20,55 >>number_format 20.555 20,55
>>>>>>PHP Version 5.1.4 / Windows NT >>round 20.545 20.55 >>round 20.555 20.56 >>number_format 20.545 20,55 >>number_format 20.555 20,56My only observation about the examples you chose is that the fractional
>>>>>parts are infinitely repeating "radiximals" in binary.
>>>>>0.545 = 545/1000 = 109/200 (irreducible) >0.555 = 555/1000 = 111/200 (irreducible)
>>>>>Both of the numbers above can't be expressed as precise binary floating >point numbers because the denominator after reduction has prime factors that >are not "2".
>>>>>PHP.INI may be a factor, but it may also be that something at a lower level >is occurring (i.e. machine arithmetic, how certain rounding settings on >floatingpoint processors or libraries are set).
>>>>>In other words, you've chosen antagonistic examples.
>>>>>Why don't you try 7/8 (0.875), 15/16 (0.9275), or 31/32 (0.96875) as the >fractional part of the numbers and see if you can get the same behavior. >I'm guessing that you may not.
>>>>>Any fraction with a reasonable denomiator (< 2^16) that is a power of 2 >would be a reasonable test case.
>>>>>Note that these are all exactly representable by a typical machine.
>>>>>Just a guess.This is the exact same problem you reported in comp.databases.mysql, and
the solution is exactly the same.
 ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstuck...@attglobal.net ==================
Has i told you on the other newsgroup
This 2 servers have the same hardware configuration
On Windows 2003 http://efeito.org/info.php
On Linux http://efeito.net/info.php
(Top posting fixed)
And as I and others have told you  when using floating point, results
when using expressions like these are unpredictable.
It's just like when using base 10:
round((1.0/3.0) + (1.0/6.0))
can equal zero, because neither 1.0/3.0 nor 1.0/1.6 can be expressed as
an exact value in base 10. They are repeating decimals.
Sure, they *should* come out to 0.5. But their actual value will be
0.499999999 to however many decimal places could be handled.
*Some* libraries will "fix" this by adding a small value (i.e.
0.000000001) to the results to "fudge" the value. But no such fudge
factor is required, nor is it always good.
You are always best to use integers if you need exact values, or add
your own fudge factor to the results.
It's been that way for the almost 40 years I've been programming, and
it's not going to change now. That's why many processors now have a
"packed decimal" or a "binary coded decimal" type internally to give
exact results.

==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp. js*******@attglobal.net
================== This discussion thread is closed Replies have been disabled for this discussion. Similar topics
2 posts
views
Thread by Matias Silva 
last post: by

6 posts
views
Thread by Penguin 
last post: by

17 posts
views
Thread by nomenklatura 
last post: by

9 posts
views
Thread by Ronald W. Roberts 
last post: by

4 posts
views
Thread by Fuzzydave 
last post: by

10 posts
views
Thread by David Coleman 
last post: by

3 posts
views
Thread by Krishna.K.1900 
last post: by

4 posts
views
Thread by =?Utf8?B?UmVuZQ==?= 
last post: by

9 posts
views
Thread by josh logan 
last post: by
          