implementing "search" on my site

[Troels F. Smit]

Where can I find information on implementing a search function on my
site ?

--
Mvh.
Troels F. Smit

[Jan Pieter Kunst]

In article <c5**********@news.net.uni-c.dk>,
"Troels F. Smit" <sm**@NOSPAM.ehp.dk> wrote:

Where can I find information on implementing a search function on my
site ?

I use this search engine:

<http://www.phpdig.net/>

JP

--
Sorry, <de*****@cauce.org> is een "spam trap".
E-mail adres is <jpk"at"akamail.com>, waarbij "at" = @.

[R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah]

"Troels F. Smit" <sm**@NOSPAM.ehp.dk> wrote in message news:<c5**********@news.net.uni-c.dk>...

Where can I find information on implementing a search function on my
site ?

Google is your friend. <http://www.google.com/search?q=php+search>

--
http://www.sendmetoindia.com - Send Me to India!
Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com

[thumb_42]

Troels F. Smit <sm**@nospam.ehp.dk> wrote:

Where can I find information on implementing a search function on my
site ?

2 that I recommend:

ht://Dig

(http://www.htdig.org/)

ht://Dig is very easy to set up, but lacks proximity support ("phrase
matching"). I like it because it's easy to set up.

Swish-e

http://www.swish-e.org/ (I think)

swish-e is a *lot* harder to set up, I still haven't got the context
stuff working right, but it's as fast as ht://Dig and supports proximity
searching. ("phrase matching") and seems to have a bit more in terms of
ranking.

I'm using swish-e most of the time these days, but don't overlook
ht://Dig if it fits your needs or you don't want to spend a day reading
the documentation.

Both are pretty darn fast and impressive.

Jamie

[Troels F. Smit]

On 2004-04-16, th******@yahoo.com <th******@yahoo.com> wrote:

Troels F. Smit <sm**@nospam.ehp.dk> wrote:

Where can I find information on implementing a search function on my
site ?

2 that I recommend:

ht://Dig

(http://www.htdig.org/)

ht://Dig is very easy to set up, but lacks proximity support ("phrase
matching"). I like it because it's easy to set up.

Swish-e

http://www.swish-e.org/ (I think)

swish-e is a *lot* harder to set up, I still haven't got the context
stuff working right, but it's as fast as ht://Dig and supports proximity
searching. ("phrase matching") and seems to have a bit more in terms of
ranking.

I'm using swish-e most of the time these days, but don't overlook
ht://Dig if it fits your needs or you don't want to spend a day reading
the documentation.

Both are pretty darn fast and impressive.

Jamie

Thanks Jamie :-)
--
Mvh.
Troels F. Smit