RegExp : using end-of-line in a pattern

[Damien]

Hi to all,
I would like to get field values from a multi-line text.

For instance :
"
Name: Mr Smith
Address: Paris
"

I've tried to use (I'm a total regexp newbie, so I took it from the doc):
eregi("Name: (.*)\n",$VariableHoldingTheText,$parts);

Problem: $parts[1] starts at the right place, but does not stop at the
end of the line. I get :
"Mr Smith
Address: Paris
"

Where am I wrong ? I've tried to google around, but didn't find anything
that could help me...

Thanks in advance for your help/hints/links !

BR
--
Damien

[Zilla]

Damien wrote:

Hi to all,
I would like to get field values from a multi-line text.

For instance :
"
Name: Mr Smith
Address: Paris
"

Im not sure what you want, but if you want to get the different lines in
different variables, then you can use the explode()-function to split
the string:

$lines = explode("\n", $string);

The above code would give an array $lines where each array-element
contains one line of $string.

If $string contains

"Name: Mr Smith
Address: Paris"

then $lines[0] contains "Name: Mr Smith" and $lines[1] contains
"Address: Paris".

More information on the explode()-function: www.php.net/explode

Zilla

[Damien]

Zilla a écrit :
(snip)

Im not sure what you want, but if you want to get the different lines in
different variables, then you can use the explode()-function to split
the string:

(snip)
Thanks for this. I have several values to look for, and I don't know in
what lines they are (imagine a form lost in the middle of a text). This
is why I did not break up the text in lines. I'd rather not look for
evey value in every line...

Any other idea ?
BR,
Damien

[Zilla]

Damien wrote:
....

Thanks for this. I have several values to look for, and I don't know in
what lines they are (imagine a form lost in the middle of a text). This
is why I did not break up the text in lines. I'd rather not look for
evey value in every line...

I think I found out whats wrong. I think I have read some place that the
function looks for the largest possible pattern. So if you are looking
for some a letter followed by a : in the following:

"x:y:z"

it will return "x:y:" and not "x:" as you were looking for.

So in your example there must be a newline after "Adress: Paris" so it
takes this line too.

When that is said, i can't figure out just now, how to prevent it from
doing that. But I'll think about it and get back later if i figure it out.

Zilla

[Chung Leong]

I would recommend using the Perl compatible regexp functions over the
POSIX ones. They're faster and more powerful. People also tend to be
more familiar with the Perl syntax.

The following snippet does what you want:

<?
$s = "
Name: Mr Smith
Address: Paris
";
preg_match_all('/^(.+?): (.+?)$/m', $s, $m, PREG_SET_ORDER);
foreach($m as $set) {
echo "{$set[1]} = {$set[2]}<br>";
}
?>

The m modifier at the end tells the regexp engine to treat newline as
end of line. The ^ assertion, which normally would only match the
beginning of the string, now match sees a match immediately following
at newline. The same for the $ end-of-line assertion.

The (.+?) parts mean capturing at least one character, with greediness
turned off. Greediness dictates whether the regexp engine will try to
find the longest possible match. We don't want it to be greedy here.
Given the string "Time: 8:00PM", for example, we want the engine to
match up the first colon and stop, instead of trying to find another
colon that'd yield a longer match.

In an actual programming situation I would use the following pattern to
deal with possible errant white spaces:

/^\s*(.+?)\s*:\s*(.+?)\s*$/m

[Damien]

Chung Leong a écrit :

I would recommend using the Perl compatible regexp functions over the
POSIX ones. They're faster and more powerful. People also tend to be
more familiar with the Perl syntax. Hi,
Thanks for this tip... I had gone for the first one in the PHP doc ;)

The following snippet does what you want:

(snip)

Thanks for the code and espescially for the time you took explaining it!
This will make me progress quite faster now ;)

I'll try you suggestion tomorrow first thing. I'll be glad to get rid of
all those substr and stristr...

Thanks again !
BR,
Damien