Mod_Perl vs PHP in memory, speed, varibles

[nntp]

I tried mod_perl. It is too troublesome. Many old scripts stopped running.
Even those running eat memory like crazy.

I wonder why mod_php does not have the problems in mod_perl, such as memory
hog, varible initialization etc.

Is there a way to use Perl scripts at the same speed of PHP without worrying
about those clearing varibles etc in mod_perl.

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

nntp wrote:

I tried mod_perl. It is too troublesome. Many old scripts stopped running.
Even those running eat memory like crazy.
Did you study this document about porting CGI scripts to mod_perl:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/porting.html
I wonder why mod_php does not have the problems in mod_perl, such as memory
hog, varible initialization etc.

The perceived difference may have something to do with the fact that
while there are many old CGI scripts that were never designed with
mod_perl in mind, PHP scripts that weren't designed with mod_php in mind
are of rare occurrence.

--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Email: http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl

[nntp]

> nntp wrote:

I tried mod_perl. It is too troublesome. Many old scripts stopped running. Even those running eat memory like crazy.
Did you study this document about porting CGI scripts to mod_perl:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/porting.html

That does not work. Even with PerlRun, there are huge memory leak.

I wonder why mod_php does not have the problems in mod_perl, such as memory hog, varible initialization etc.

The perceived difference may have something to do with the fact that
while there are many old CGI scripts that were never designed with
mod_perl in mind, PHP scripts that weren't designed with mod_php in mind
are of rare occurrence.

PHP programmers don't need to worry about initializtion, and the PHP itself
will clear all memory after usage. I don't understand why mod_perl can not
do it. This really kills perl in majority. Anyone can write php, but only
few can write mod_perl.

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

nntp wrote:

Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:

Did you study this document about porting CGI scripts to mod_perl:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/porting.html

That does not work.

I should have realized that you are just a pitiful troll. Show us some
hard evidence supporting your claim, or else there is no reason to talk.

--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Email: http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl

[nntp]

> nntp wrote:

Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:

Did you study this document about porting CGI scripts to mod_perl:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/porting.html
That does not work.

I should have realized that you are just a pitiful troll. Show us some
hard evidence supporting your claim, or else there is no reason to talk.

Fuck off. Stupid shit.

--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Email: http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl

[Jerry Stuckle]

nntp wrote:

nntp wrote:

Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:

Did you study this document about porting CGI scripts to mod_perl:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/porting.html

That does not work.

I should have realized that you are just a pitiful troll. Show us some
hard evidence supporting your claim, or else there is no reason to talk.

Fuck off. Stupid shit.

--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Email: http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl

LOL.

Gunnar,

You got him nailed. Typical troll response.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attglobal.net
==================

[Tad McClellan]

[ Followups set ]
nntp <nn**@alexa.com> wrote:

nntp wrote:

> Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:

Show us some
hard evidence supporting your claim, or else there is no reason to talk.

Fuck off. Stupid shit.

Very intellectual of you, we are surely impressed.

I guess that means that you cannot support your claim.

We were all wondering if Gunnar had it right or not, thanks for
posting your confirmation of which way it is.
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
ta***@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas