sajax or ajax

[lucaspirola]

somebody do something with this.. i'd like talk about.. it's so perfect
or no?? tell me please ;-)

[unruly]

Google does a lot with this, and hopefully, more and more web-services
will fall in line with the (S)AJAX motif, as it seems like a pretty
nice combo for nearly-seamless web application integration.

[Chung Leong]

<lu*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@f14g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...

somebody do something with this.. i'd like talk about.. it's so perfect
or no?? tell me please ;-)

Using a technology because it has a cool acronym is--I'm sorry--stupid.

As always, it depends on your requirements.

[lucaspirola]

i know its depend on your requirements, but this "acronym" can change
style of web development i think...now i can do tools for web more
powerfull and with better usuability... and only for curiosity Chung
Leong ...you do some think with this already???

thanks for answers....

[Chung Leong]

<lu*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...

i know its depend on your requirements, but this "acronym" can change
style of web development i think...now i can do tools for web more
powerfull and with better usuability... and only for curiosity Chung
Leong ...you do some think with this already???

thanks for answers....

Change it for the worse, probably. Client-side programming is always harder
than server-side programming because you don't control the environment where
your code is run. In addition to your own bugs, you end up having to deal
with bugs in the browsers themselves. Only today I had to fix a problem that
affects Netscape 7.0 but not 7.02.

Basically, unless you have a pretty good reason to use Javascript, don't.