On 20 Jan 2005 13:44:11 -0500, steve <Us************@dbForumz.com> wrote:
"user2424" wrote: I noticed that Message-ID: <41ef3143
_4@alt.athenanews.com> from steve
contained the following:
Posted using the http://www.dbforumz.com interface, at
author’s requestArticles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
OBTopic: Putting a space before the quoting character is not
showing conformance.
Thanks, Geoff. Can you provide a reference on this.
There's this draft:
http://www.karlsruhe.org/rfc/draft-i...-useage-00.txt
"
3.2.2.1. Quoting and Attributions
[...]
When a followup agent incorporates the "precursor" as a quotation, it
MUST be distinguished from the surrounding text in some way, and
SHOULD be so dintinguished by prefacing each line of the quoted text
(even if it is empty) with the character ">" (or perhaps with "> " in
the case of a previously unquoted line). This will result in multiple
levels of ">" when quoted content itself contains quoted content, and
it will also facilitate the automatic analysis of articles.
"
Although as the document notes, "It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
reference material". I don't know off the top of my head any official document
that defines quoting prefixes. ">", no leading space, is certainly the de facto
standard.
--
Andy Hassall / <an**@andyh.co.uk> / <http://www.andyh.co.uk>
<http://www.andyhsoftware.co.uk/space> Space: disk usage analysis tool