summarize bytes

[bastardx]

Hi
I wonder if you can point me to some scripts because I don't know perl.
I think that perl is best for what I want to do.
I have special kind of logs which looks like following:
ID - is client id
Date - is server access date
IN - bytes sent to server
OUT - bytes received from server

ID DATE IN OUT
id12 2005-06-07 12 1091
id16 2005-06-07 893 17881
id12 2005-06-07 53 9912
id34 2005-06-07 323 7211
id34 2005-06-07 15 2381
id34 2005-06-07 542 9771
id16 2005-06-07 90 9912
id16 2005-06-07 409 6712
id12 2005-06-07 311 3443
id34 2005-06-07 342 1123
id12 2005-06-07 90 7455
id34 2005-06-07 145 512
id12 2005-06-07 88 1667

I want to summarize IN and OUT bytes for particular ID per day
Fg
ID DATE TOTAL_IN TOTAL_OUT
id12 2005-06-07 12314 8098794

Can you help me?

[Randal L. Schwartz]

*** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeed.com ***

> "bastardx" == bastardx <ba******@S-P-A-Mop.pl> writes:

bastardx> Can you help me?

Yes! Visit http://learn.perl.org, and read the stuff recommended there.

And STOP POSTING TO COMP.LANG.PERL, which doesn't exist.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - [phone]
<me****@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
-----= Posted via Newsfeed.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeed.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== 100,000 Groups! - 19 Servers! - Unlimited Download! =-----

[bastardx]

> bastardx> Can you help me?

Yes! Visit http://learn.perl.org, and read the stuff recommended there.

And STOP POSTING TO COMP.LANG.PERL, which doesn't exist.

plonk

[Joe Smith]

bastardx wrote:

id34 2005-06-07 323 7211
id34 2005-06-07 15 2381

That's trivial to do using a hash or two in Perl.

It's the sort of thing found as student exercises
in early chapters of just about any Perl tutorial.

Hint:
$info{$id}{IN} += $in;
$info{$id}{OUT} += $out;

-Joe
Followup-To has been set to comp.lang.perl.misc

[Jürgen Exner]

bastardx wrote:

bastardx> Can you help me?

Yes! Visit http://learn.perl.org, and read the stuff recommended
there. And STOP POSTING TO COMP.LANG.PERL, which doesn't exist.

plonk

I wonder if you have any idea at all whom you just plonked.....
Yes, it is *the* Randal L. Schwartz.

Concidering your past contribution to the Perl community (you did
contribute, didn't you?) I am quite certain that nobody will follow your
your public plonk. Rather the other way round.

jue

[bastardx]

> I wonder if you have any idea at all whom you just plonked.....

Yes, it is *the* Randal L. Schwartz.

I dont know him and never will, I hope :)
anyway to be "the Randal L. Schwartz" is no excuse to be rude.
excuse me "stupid" question if it realy was
eos
best regards

[Randal L. Schwartz]

*** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeed.com ***

> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Exner <ju******@hotmail.com> writes:

plonk

Jürgen> I wonder if you have any idea at all whom you just plonked.....

Besides, plonk'ing an *answerer* is useless. Plonk is a clue for all
answer-givers to ignore future questions from a given clueless person.

So, all you end up with is fewer (correct) answers. Your choice. :)

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - [phone]
<me****@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
-----= Posted via Newsfeed.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeed.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== 100,000 Groups! - 19 Servers! - Unlimited Download! =-----

[thoomas]

Don't be so sure --- I'm with bastardx on this one.

[Jürgen Exner]

thoomas wrote:

Don't be so sure --- I'm with bastardx on this one.

If you would have quoted some context like it has been a proven Usenet
custom for over 2 decades then people might actually know what you are
agreeing with.

jue

[thoomas]

Right, and this NG doesn't exist, either.

[Jürgen Exner]

thoomas wrote:

Right, and this NG doesn't exist, either.

What are you agreeing with?
Would you mind quoting some context such that people have a chance to know
what your talking about?

jue