By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
444,058 Members | 1,209 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 444,058 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Speed and portability of XML parsers

P: n/a
Hi,

Does anybody knows faster parsers than C - RXP in validating category
and Expat in non-validating category?

Are both of them (or their faster ones) portable in Mac OS X?

Thanks,

Nikhil

Jul 20 '05 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
2 Replies


P: n/a
Nikhil wrote:
Does anybody knows faster parsers than C - RXP in validating category
and Expat in non-validating category?
In the XMLgawk project, we also use Expat.
Expat really is fast and portable.
Are both of them (or their faster ones) portable in Mac OS X?


We had no problems in using Expat with MacOSX.
Jul 20 '05 #2

P: n/a
In article <11**********************@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
Nikhil <ni************@yahoo.com> wrote:
Does anybody knows faster parsers than C - RXP in validating category
and Expat in non-validating category?

Are both of them (or their faster ones) portable in Mac OS X?


RXP compiles on MacOS X without problems.

-- Richard

Jul 20 '05 #3

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.