hr**@lycos.de (hr**@lycos.de) writes:
once more, thank you for your assistance and patience.
can you explain in more detail why my code violates the particle
restriction ok (Elt:Elt -- NameAndTypeOK)?
i tried to understand the w3c recommendation but the complexity is
dazzling.
For one complex type definition to restrict another, the type
definitions of corresponding element declarations in their content
models must be _declared_ to have identical (top-level, same name) or
derived-by-restriction-from-one-another type definitions.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail:
ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL:
http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]