In article <pa****************************@indigen.com>,
Michel Gutierrez <mi********************@indigen.com> wrote:
I have an XML document from which the xpath expression
"A[1]/B[2]/C[3]/D[4]/E[5]/F[6]" selects a node.
The C matched there is the third C child of the relevant B.
I would expect, in the same document, the expression
"descendant::C[3]/D[4]/E[5]/F[6]" to select at least the same node. But
the xpath implementation doesn't return any match.
The C matched there is the third C descendant of the current node.
..//C[3]/D[4]/E[5]/F[6] will match at least the original node, because
// means "descendant-or-self::*/".
-- Richard