I see nothing in there changing the requirements to sites beyond government
or agencies doing business with the government, which has been the "charter"
all along. If you have a cite of how this is going to be forced on others,
please cite, as the link you published says nothing, as far as I can tell.
The lawsuits, of which Target is probably the most well known, were not
government lawsuits, but civil suits. And, someone can sue you for
scratching your butt, if they want to.
I feel that adhering to standards is a good thing, to avoid nuissance suits,
but I see no atttempt, in this paper, to foist it on anyone other than
federal agencies and government contractors.
--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
Subscribe to my blog
http://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com/lists/feed.rss
or just read it:
http://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com/
*************************************************
| Think outside the box!
|
*************************************************
"clintonG" <no****@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:uS**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Web Development Accessibility About to Become Regulated By Law
Read it (if you can) and weep because its very near becoming written into
law now that this report has been finished...and not just for federal
websites.
Section 508 Report
http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/refresh/report/