There is already an open DataReader associated with this Command..

[=?Utf-8?B?QXNhZg==?=]

Hello,

I have two Table Adapters that I am storing in a Cache using .NET 2.0 Web
Service and the Database is SQL Server on Windows 2003 IIS6.
Each of the two table adapters has its own Connection string.

The reason that table adapters are in cache is because I would like to
maintain the connection string that will not be closed for any Insert or
Update as there are thousands of requests per minutes to the WS.

Problems are that when calling Insert or Update from the table adapters I
received the error:
"There is already an open DataReader associated with this Command which must
be closed first" and then the table adapter that I called Insert or Update
from is remove from the Cache.
Thanks in advanced for any advice.
Asaf

[Spam Catcher]

=?Utf-8?B?QXNhZg==?= <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in
news:B9**********************************@microsof t.com:

The reason that table adapters are in cache is because I would like to
maintain the connection string that will not be closed for any Insert
or Update as there are thousands of requests per minutes to the WS.

No need to do this, ADO.NET already provides connection pooling.
Maintaining a connection like this is generally inefficient. You should
open a connection at the last possible moment and close as early as
possible.

--
sp**********@rogers.com (Do not e-mail)

[Mr. Arnold]

"Asaf" <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:B9**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hello,

I have two Table Adapters that I am storing in a Cache using .NET 2.0 Web
Service and the Database is SQL Server on Windows 2003 IIS6.
Each of the two table adapters has its own Connection string.

The reason that table adapters are in cache is because I would like to
maintain the connection string that will not be closed for any Insert or
Update as there are thousands of requests per minutes to the WS.

Problems are that when calling Insert or Update from the table adapters I
received the error:
"There is already an open DataReader associated with this Command which
must
be closed first" and then the table adapter that I called Insert or Update
from is remove from the Cache.
Thanks in advanced for any advice.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8xx3tyca.aspx

[Mr. Arnold]

"Asaf" <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:93**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hello,

I did a test with a web service to insert 100 records to DB when pressing
the Invoke button from IE.

When using this code:

TestTableAdapter ta_Test = new TestTableAdapter();
ta_Test.Connection.Open();

for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
ta_Test.Insert(i);
}

ta_Test.Connection.Close();

SQL Server 2005 Profiler shows "Audit Login" then the whole 100 records to
insert one by one "RPC:Completed" and then the "Audit Logout".
When using this code that suppose to use connection pooling:

TestTableAdapter ta_Test = new TestTableAdapter();

for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
ta_Test.Connection.Open();
ta_Test.Insert(i);
ta_Test.Connection.Close();
}

SQL Server 2005 Profiler shows "Audit Login" then insert one record
"RPC:Completed" and then the "Audit Logout" for each row, so there is an
Open
and Close connection for each row inserted to the DB.
Doesn’t it needs to pool a connection that is already opened and to
Login –
Logout for each inserted row?

Well #1, I wouldn't be using Table Adapters in a solution myself. I would
be using SQL Command Objects with a Stored Procedure, which is a faster
solution, because it would be a precompiled Stored Procedure that will stay
in memory based on the traffic you indicate.

As far as you trying to test the connection pooling, you should get with a
DBA and have he or she help you. Connection Pooling is there and it works,
which is a better solution, than what you're doing currently. You should let
ADO.NET, SQL Server and the O/S work for you.

[=?Utf-8?B?QXNhZg==?=]

Hi Arnold,

Why do I need a DBA?
Is there something to configure in SQL Server?
These two examples just show that Connection Pooling does not work or
connection pooling does not work with Table Adapters?

Thanks for your help but anyway I am still looking for a solution to this
problem so much appreciated if someone can advice me here.

Asaf
"Mr. Arnold" wrote:

>
"Asaf" <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:93**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hello,

I did a test with a web service to insert 100 records to DB when pressing
the Invoke button from IE.

When using this code:

TestTableAdapter ta_Test = new TestTableAdapter();
ta_Test.Connection.Open();

for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
ta_Test.Insert(i);
}

ta_Test.Connection.Close();

SQL Server 2005 Profiler shows "Audit Login" then the whole 100 records to
insert one by one "RPC:Completed" and then the "Audit Logout".
When using this code that suppose to use connection pooling:

TestTableAdapter ta_Test = new TestTableAdapter();

for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
ta_Test.Connection.Open();
ta_Test.Insert(i);
ta_Test.Connection.Close();
}

SQL Server 2005 Profiler shows "Audit Login" then insert one record
"RPC:Completed" and then the "Audit Logout" for each row, so there is an
Open
and Close connection for each row inserted to the DB.
Doesn’t it needs to pool a connection that is already opened and to
Login –
Logout for each inserted row?

Well #1, I wouldn't be using Table Adapters in a solution myself. I would
be using SQL Command Objects with a Stored Procedure, which is a faster
solution, because it would be a precompiled Stored Procedure that will stay
in memory based on the traffic you indicate.

As far as you trying to test the connection pooling, you should get with a
DBA and have he or she help you. Connection Pooling is there and it works,
which is a better solution, than what you're doing currently. You should let
ADO.NET, SQL Server and the O/S work for you.

[Mr. Arnold]

"Asaf" <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:E8**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi Arnold,

Why do I need a DBA?
Is there something to configure in SQL Server?
These two examples just show that Connection Pooling does not work or
connection pooling does not work with Table Adapters?

You do not know what you're talking about, and you need help. You need to
talk to a SQL Server Admin/DBA.

>
Thanks for your help but anyway I am still looking for a solution to this
problem so much appreciated if someone can advice me here.

You're not going to get the solution. You have been given the solution, but
you refuse to recognize it.

[=?Utf-8?B?QXNhZg==?=]

Hello Arnold,

You are saying very HARD words here and very scorn ones.
Please live this post to be answered by others who are willing to explain by
details.
Anyway thanks for you support.

Asaf
"Mr. Arnold" wrote:

>
"Asaf" <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:E8**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi Arnold,

Why do I need a DBA?
Is there something to configure in SQL Server?
These two examples just show that Connection Pooling does not work or
connection pooling does not work with Table Adapters?

You do not know what you're talking about, and you need help. You need to
talk to a SQL Server Admin/DBA.

Thanks for your help but anyway I am still looking for a solution to this
problem so much appreciated if someone can advice me here.

You're not going to get the solution. You have been given the solution, but
you refuse to recognize it.

[=?Utf-8?B?QXNhZg==?=]

Sorry for the spelling mistakes, I meant "Leave" :)

"Mr. Arnold" wrote:

>
"Asaf" <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:E8**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi Arnold,

Why do I need a DBA?
Is there something to configure in SQL Server?
These two examples just show that Connection Pooling does not work or
connection pooling does not work with Table Adapters?

You do not know what you're talking about, and you need help. You need to
talk to a SQL Server Admin/DBA.

Thanks for your help but anyway I am still looking for a solution to this
problem so much appreciated if someone can advice me here.

You're not going to get the solution. You have been given the solution, but
you refuse to recognize it.

[Mr. Arnold]

"Asaf" <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:DA**********************************@microsof t.com...

Sorry for the spelling mistakes, I meant "Leave" :)

I don't think you own me or anything else.
If you don't want to read it then don't.
But it is what it is for you on this.
I guess the truth hurts.
Should I get you some tissues for your issues?

[Mr. Arnold]

"Asaf" <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in message
news:2F**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi All,

Will be much appreciated if someone can response with more details (not
the
Arnold way) why connection pooling is not working for my test table
adapters.

Why must you whine about it?

MS.Public.sqlserver.connect -- forum.

[Spam Catcher]

"Mr. Arnold" <MR. Ar****@Arnold.comwrote in
news:eT**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:

Well #1, I wouldn't be using Table Adapters in a solution myself. I
would be using SQL Command Objects with a Stored Procedure, which is
a faster solution, because it would be a precompiled Stored Procedure
that will stay in memory based on the traffic you indicate.

As a note, it's a religious debate between inline SQL and stored
procedures. As far as I'm aware, the performance gain by using SPs is
minimal, hence I prefer to use inline SQL (no need to load SQL onto a
server, and everything is contained within the application.

As far as you trying to test the connection pooling, you should get
with a DBA and have he or she help you. Connection Pooling is there
and it works, which is a better solution, than what you're doing
currently. You should let ADO.NET, SQL Server and the O/S work for
you.

--
sp**********@rogers.com (Do not e-mail)

[Spam Catcher]

=?Utf-8?B?QXNhZg==?= <AG**@newsgroups.nospamwrote in
news:93**********************************@microsof t.com:

When using this code that suppose to use connection pooling:

TestTableAdapter ta_Test = new TestTableAdapter();

for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
ta_Test.Connection.Open();
ta_Test.Insert(i);
ta_Test.Connection.Close();
}

SQL Server 2005 Profiler shows "Audit Login" then insert one record
"RPC:Completed" and then the "Audit Logout" for each row, so there is
an Open and Close connection for each row inserted to the DB.

A connection pool is created for each unique connection string. When a
pool is created, multiple connection objects are created and added to
the pool so that the minimum pool size requirement is satisfied.
Connections are added to the pool as needed, up to the maximum pool
size.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...ca(vs.71).aspx

FYI, in the maximum pool size just happens to be 100 connections... Try
your test again with 500 - 1000 interations.
--
sp**********@rogers.com (Do not e-mail)