473,320 Members | 1,902 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,320 software developers and data experts.

Why no 'Visual Assembler"?

There are times it would be good to be able to write assembly code to
integrate with other VS languages, such as VS C++ .NET. For example, I might
want to write a REALLY fast algorithm that does CALCULATIONS only and
bypasses any overhead imposed by the compiler.

Is inline assembly still possible? Wouldn't a Visual Assembler language make
some sense (although the 'visual' is only to imply compatibility and
seemless integration into other Visual languages)?
Dec 19 '07 #1
12 1549

"Peter Anthony" <po*******@roundtripllc.comwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
There are times it would be good to be able to write assembly code to
integrate with other VS languages, such as VS C++ .NET. For example, I
might want to write a REALLY fast algorithm that does CALCULATIONS only
and bypasses any overhead imposed by the compiler.

Is inline assembly still possible? Wouldn't a Visual Assembler language
make some sense (although the 'visual' is only to imply compatibility and
seemless integration into other Visual languages)?
I'm pretty sure x86 inline assembler is still alive and kicking in the
latest VC++, although I seem to remember that x86_64 might not be. I'd also
think that inline assembly now recognizes more instructions than ever
before.

However, you're better off writing very simple C code (register transfer
style) and let the optimizer run, it will probably generate better machine
code than you. Humans can keep track of register spills pretty effectively
but when you add pipelining, branch prediction, cache associativity, and a
whole bunch of other factors, instruction costs are not constant and there's
no way a programmer can optimize them all in a reasonable amount of time.
Dec 19 '07 #2
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:25:07 -0600, "Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]"
<rb*@nospam.nospamwrote:
>
"Peter Anthony" <po*******@roundtripllc.comwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>There are times it would be good to be able to write assembly code to
integrate with other VS languages, such as VS C++ .NET. For example, I
might want to write a REALLY fast algorithm that does CALCULATIONS only
and bypasses any overhead imposed by the compiler.

Is inline assembly still possible? Wouldn't a Visual Assembler language
make some sense (although the 'visual' is only to imply compatibility and
seemless integration into other Visual languages)?

I'm pretty sure x86 inline assembler is still alive and kicking in the
latest VC++, although I seem to remember that x86_64 might not be. I'd also
think that inline assembly now recognizes more instructions than ever
before.

However, you're better off writing very simple C code (register transfer
style) and let the optimizer run, it will probably generate better machine
code than you. Humans can keep track of register spills pretty effectively
but when you add pipelining, branch prediction, cache associativity, and a
whole bunch of other factors, instruction costs are not constant and there's
no way a programmer can optimize them all in a reasonable amount of time.
It is also often true that spending the same time working on the
design of the program data flow and algorithms yields far better
improvements that trying to hand craft assembler code.

Besides, "real men" don't need Visual tools. Edlin is good enough for
us!

Dec 20 '07 #3
Edlin is good enough for us!

Only if you're a glutton for punishment.
Dec 20 '07 #4

"Larry Smith" <no_spam@_nospam.comwrote in message
news:Og**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>Edlin is good enough for us!

Only if you're a glutton for punishment.
True, but vim is good enough, and it's not really any less arcane.
Dec 20 '07 #5
I LOVE vim, the best editor in the world!

Regards

Kerem

--
-----------------------
Beste Grüsse / Best regards / Votre bien devoue
Kerem Gümrükcü
Microsoft Live Space: http://kerem-g.spaces.live.com/
Latest Open-Source Projects: http://entwicklung.junetz.de
-----------------------
"This reply is provided as is, without warranty express or implied."
Dec 20 '07 #6
"Larry Smith" <no_spam@_nospam.comwrote in message
news:Og**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>Edlin is good enough for us!

Only if you're a glutton for punishment.

True, but vim is good enough, and it's not really any less arcane.
I was a fan of "Brief" myself many moons ago but I understand there's a Vim
plugin that can emulate it.
Dec 20 '07 #7
Peter Anthony wrote:
:: There are times it would be good to be able to write assembly code
:: to integrate with other VS languages, such as VS C++ .NET. For
:: example, I might want to write a REALLY fast algorithm that does
:: CALCULATIONS only and bypasses any overhead imposed by the
:: compiler.
::
:: Is inline assembly still possible? Wouldn't a Visual Assembler
:: language make some sense (although the 'visual' is only to imply
:: compatibility and seemless integration into other Visual
:: languages)?

If you have the full package - Professional Edition - VS does include
an assembler. Just add a .asm file to your project and compile!

It is just that hardly anybody uses it, because it is *extremely* hard
to outsmart the compiler. If you can shave more than one or two asm
instructions from a compiled function, you are at the Guru level !
Bo Persson
Dec 20 '07 #8

"Bo Persson" <bo*@gmb.dkwrote in message
news:5s*************@mid.individual.net...
Peter Anthony wrote:
:: There are times it would be good to be able to write assembly code
:: to integrate with other VS languages, such as VS C++ .NET. For
:: example, I might want to write a REALLY fast algorithm that does
:: CALCULATIONS only and bypasses any overhead imposed by the
:: compiler.
::
:: Is inline assembly still possible? Wouldn't a Visual Assembler
:: language make some sense (although the 'visual' is only to imply
:: compatibility and seemless integration into other Visual
:: languages)?

If you have the full package - Professional Edition - VS does include an
assembler. Just add a .asm file to your project and compile!

It is just that hardly anybody uses it, because it is *extremely* hard to
outsmart the compiler. If you can shave more than one or two asm
instructions from a compiled function, you are at the Guru level !
It's easy to shave *instructions*. But fewer instructions doesn't mean
smaller or faster code. And while the size of each instruction can be
known, the speed is dependent on far too many factors to consider by hand.
>

Bo Persson


Dec 20 '07 #9
r norman wrote:
Edlin is good enough for us!
Theoretically we only need a keyboard with two buttons: 0 and 1, and we
could enter machine code directly that way.

Tom
Dec 21 '07 #10
Peter Anthony wrote:
There are times it would be good to be able to write assembly code to
integrate with other VS languages, such as VS C++ .NET. For example, I might
want to write a REALLY fast algorithm that does CALCULATIONS only and
bypasses any overhead imposed by the compiler.

Is inline assembly still possible? Wouldn't a Visual Assembler language make
some sense (although the 'visual' is only to imply compatibility and
seemless integration into other Visual languages)?

Roughly speaking, you want something like:

int main() {
//c++ code

__asm {
//inline assembly code
}
}
Check out the msdn pages on it, for something authoritative:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/45yd4tzz.aspx

--
SM
rot13 for email
Dec 21 '07 #11

"Tamas Demjen" <td*****@yahoo.comwrote in message
news:u8***************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>r norman wrote:
>Edlin is good enough for us!

Theoretically we only need a keyboard with two buttons: 0 and 1, and we
could enter machine code directly that way.
Any telegraph operator will tell you that a single button is sufficient
(thanks to Samuel Morse).
>
Tom

Dec 24 '07 #12
You could make a program like,

int main()
{
asm mov eax,2
asm mov ebx,4
asm add eax,ebx
asm cmp eax,5
asm je ok
no:
ok:

return 0;
}
"Shadowman" <fu**********@pbzpnfg.argescribió en el mensaje
news:fk**********@aioe.org...
Peter Anthony wrote:
>There are times it would be good to be able to write assembly code to
integrate with other VS languages, such as VS C++ .NET. For example, I
might want to write a REALLY fast algorithm that does CALCULATIONS only
and bypasses any overhead imposed by the compiler.

Is inline assembly still possible? Wouldn't a Visual Assembler language
make some sense (although the 'visual' is only to imply compatibility and
seemless integration into other Visual languages)?


Roughly speaking, you want something like:

int main() {
//c++ code

__asm {
//inline assembly code
}
}
Check out the msdn pages on it, for something authoritative:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/45yd4tzz.aspx

--
SM
rot13 for email

Jan 14 '08 #13

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

1
by: Seth Guard | last post by:
(Sorry for the cross-post, but no one responded to my other thread.) When developing a web page in VS.Net, I see everything in WYSIWYG format. And when I am creating a User Control, I see that...
32
by: Marcus | last post by:
We all know that the "gets" function from the Standard C Library (which is part of the Standard C++ Library) is dangerous. It provides no bounds check, so it's easy to overwrite memory when using...
388
by: maniac | last post by:
Hey guys, I'm new here, just a simple question. I'm learning to Program in C, and I was recommended a book called, "Mastering C Pointers", just asking if any of you have read it, and if it's...
13
by: Dave win | last post by:
howdy.... plz take a look at the following codes, and tell me the reason. 1 #define swap(a,b) a=a^b;b=b^a;a=a^b 2 3 int main(void){ 4 register int a=4; 5 register int b=5;...
11
by: Tolga | last post by:
After a very rapid entrance into the Python, I have immediately looked for a good IDE. Komodo and Wing IDE look very good and I think they are enough. But now, I am searching for a Pyhton...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
0
by: CloudSolutions | last post by:
Introduction: For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
1
by: Shællîpôpï 09 | last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
0
by: af34tf | last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.