An application is an application. a .Net application is just an application
written using the .Net platform, so in that respect it's no different. But
as for your sales team, lower development cost can be translated to lower
cost for the end product.
--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
DSI PrintManager, Miradyne Component Libraries:
http://www.miradyne.net
"JimRabit" <ji************@bituk.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@l22g2000prc.googlegr oups.com...
On 23 Aug, 13:06, "Kevin Spencer" <unclechut...@nothinks.comwrote:
>It's more cost-effective. On average, it takes fewer man-hours to write
.Net
software than C++ software.
--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
DSI PrintManager, Miradyne Component Libraries:http://www.miradyne.net
"JimRabit" <jim.richard...@bituk.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@e9g2000prf.googlegro ups.com...
Hi,
Can anybody suggest any good commercial or marketing reasons for
developing in .Net?
Many thanks for any suggestions...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Good point. So that's cheaper for the development team...
What about the end product, and how does .net development help the
sales team sell a product developed in .net? e.g. "Our product uses
XML Web Services, so your existing software can talk to our product".