Compatibility between differnet .NET versions

[=?Utf-8?B?U3RlcGhlbiBSaXRjaGll?=]

Hi

I have tried searching around but can't seem to get a definitive answer

1. Is it possible to have .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 installed on the same PC and
I can then develop and deploy applications in either of theswe two versions
without fear of any cross over (e.g. a .NET2 application links to a
dependency on the .NET1 framework)...?

2. Is it possible to have SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 installed on
the same PC, again to use seperately between the two .NET versions as
detailed above.

Thanks for any help / suggestions.

[=?Utf-8?B?TWFuaXNoIEJhZm5h?=]

Hi,
As I understand, the 1.1 and 2.0 framework can co-exist on the same machine
at the same time.You would find following msdn links useful:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s80xxs7s.aspx
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...1c(vs.71).aspx
--
Hope this helps.
Thanks and Regards.
Manish Bafna.
MCP and MCTS.

"Stephen Ritchie" wrote:

Hi

I have tried searching around but can't seem to get a definitive answer

1. Is it possible to have .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 installed on the same PC and
I can then develop and deploy applications in either of theswe two versions
without fear of any cross over (e.g. a .NET2 application links to a
dependency on the .NET1 framework)...?

2. Is it possible to have SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 installed on
the same PC, again to use seperately between the two .NET versions as
detailed above.

Thanks for any help / suggestions.

[Kevin Spencer]

Yes, both are possible. All of the .Net versions can be installed on the
same machine, and each successive version ships with the earlier versions
included.

As for SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005, each service can have a
different instance running on the same machine. If you install SQL Server
2005 after installing SQL Server 2000, it will detect the SQL Server 2000
instance and set itself up with a named instance.

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP

Printing Components, Email Components,
FTP Client Classes, Enhanced Data Controls, much more.
DSI PrintManager, Miradyne Component Libraries:
http://www.miradyne.net

"Stephen Ritchie" <St************@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in
message news:85**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi

I have tried searching around but can't seem to get a definitive answer

1. Is it possible to have .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 installed on the same PC
and
I can then develop and deploy applications in either of theswe two
versions
without fear of any cross over (e.g. a .NET2 application links to a
dependency on the .NET1 framework)...?

2. Is it possible to have SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 installed on
the same PC, again to use seperately between the two .NET versions as
detailed above.

Thanks for any help / suggestions.

[=?Utf-8?B?U3RlcGhlbiBSaXRjaGll?=]

Cheers :)
"Kevin Spencer" wrote:

Yes, both are possible. All of the .Net versions can be installed on the
same machine, and each successive version ships with the earlier versions
included.

As for SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005, each service can have a
different instance running on the same machine. If you install SQL Server
2005 after installing SQL Server 2000, it will detect the SQL Server 2000
instance and set itself up with a named instance.

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP

Printing Components, Email Components,
FTP Client Classes, Enhanced Data Controls, much more.
DSI PrintManager, Miradyne Component Libraries:
http://www.miradyne.net

"Stephen Ritchie" <St************@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in
message news:85**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi

I have tried searching around but can't seem to get a definitive answer

1. Is it possible to have .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 installed on the same PC
and
I can then develop and deploy applications in either of theswe two
versions
without fear of any cross over (e.g. a .NET2 application links to a
dependency on the .NET1 framework)...?

2. Is it possible to have SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 installed on
the same PC, again to use seperately between the two .NET versions as
detailed above.

Thanks for any help / suggestions.

[Skpananghat]

hmmm good.. i too know that both versions co- Exists.. But when i
tried to install .Net 2.0 in a machine which is already having 1.1..
it is trying to uninstall the previous version of .Net..
so any settings need to be changed for this one

Sk
http://dotnetscoups.blogspot.com

On Jul 17, 5:42 pm, Stephen Ritchie
<[e-mail]:

Cheers :)

"Kevin Spencer" wrote:

Yes, both are possible. All of the .Net versions can be installed on the
same machine, and each successive version ships with the earlier versions
included.

As for SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005, each service can have a
different instance running on the same machine. If you install SQL Server
2005 after installing SQL Server 2000, it will detect the SQL Server 2000
instance and set itself up with a named instance.

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP

Printing Components, Email Components,
FTP Client Classes, Enhanced Data Controls, much more.
DSI PrintManager, Miradyne Component Libraries:
http://www.miradyne.net

"Stephen Ritchie" <[e-mail] in
messagenews:85**********************************@m icrosoft.com...

Hi

I have tried searching around but can't seem to get a definitive answer

1. Is it possible to have .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 installed on the same PC
and
I can then develop and deploy applications in either of theswe two
versions
without fear of any cross over (e.g. a .NET2 application links to a
dependency on the .NET1 framework)...?

2. Is it possible to have SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 installed on
the same PC, again to use seperately between the two .NET versions as
detailed above.

Thanks for any help / suggestions.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -